MELATIH KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS SISWA MELALUI PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN POE (PREDICTION, OBSERVATION, EXPLANATION)

Pendi Sinulingga, Theo Jhoni Hartanto, Winda Adwitya

Abstract


Based on the observation in the physical science instruction, especially in the material of harmonic vibration at SMAN 1 (Public Senior High School), Palangkaraya Municipality, it has been found that the instruction is only focused on the knowledge aspect of harmonic motion, but not yet focused on how to train the students’ KPS (Science Process Skills). One of the solutions being able to train the KPS is the instruction  model of POE (Prediction, Observaation, Explanation). The goal of this research is to train the mastery of the students’ science process skills and to know the result of the students’ cognitive learning after they have followed the instruction by implementing the POE model in the material of harmonious vibration. This research is a pre-experimental research. The research has been implemented in the 11th class of MIA 1 SMAN 1, Palangkaraya. Based on the research, it has been known that: (1) 20% of the students having the mastery of KPS with very good category, 55% of the students having the mastery of KPS with good category, and the remaining 25% of the students’ having the mastery of KPS with sufficiently good category, and (2) the completeness of the cognitive learning result showing the completeness of 36 students and the non-completeness of 4 students or 90% of the students in the 11th class of MIA 1 SMAN 1 Palangkaraya have reached the completeness.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ibrahim, M. (2014). Inovasi Pendidikan Sains dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains di PPs Universitas Negeri Surabaya tanggal 18 Januari 2014.

Ibrahim, M. (2012). Seri Pembelajaran Inovatif: Konsep, Miskonsepsi, dan Cara Pembelajarannya. Surabaya: Unesa Press.

Liew, C.W., Treagust, & David. (1998). The Effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain Tasks in Diagnosing Students' Understanding of Science and in Identifying Their Levels of Achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association San Diego, CA, April: 13-17.

Nwosu, A.A. (2006). Acquisition of Science Process Skills by Students different cognitive levels. Review of Education 13: 155–166.

Sahin, M. (2009). Exploring University Students' Expectations and Beliefs About Physics and Physics Learning in Problem Based Learning Context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, Technology Education, 5(4), 321-333.

Sanjaya, W. (2011). Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Slavin, R. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik Jilid Satu. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Subiyanto. (1988). Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Suparno, P. (2007). Metodologi Pembelajaran Fisika: Konstruktivistik dan Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Urbancic & Glazar. (2012). Impact of Experiments on 13 years-old pupils' Understanding of Selected Science Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 8(3), 207-218.

Wu, Y.T. & Tsai, C.C. (2005). Effects of constructivist-oriented instruction on elementary school students'cognitive structures. Journal Of Biological Education, 3, 113-118.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jvk.v30i1.1208

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 18 times
PDF - 6 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Vidya Karya Jurnal Kependidikan

Indexed By:

               

 

 

Creative Commons License

Vidya Karya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.