Improving Students' Metacognitive Skills and Learning Outcomes Through The Application of Task-Based Learning Model of Direct Instruction

Syahmani Syahmani, Almubarak Almubarak, Nor Aulia Azizah

Abstract


The problem of low metacognitive skills and student learning outcomes on colloid topics is overcome by implementing Task-Based Learning Direct Instruction (TBLDI) models. This study aims to improve (1) metacognitive skills, (2) learning outcomes aspects of knowledge, attitudes, and skills, (3) teacher implementation in applying the TBLDI model; (4) student activity. This research was conducted using a classroom action research design in two cycles. Each cycle consisted of four stages: planning, action, observation, and reflection. The research subjects were 33 students of class XI IPA 3 at SMA Negeri 10 Banjarmasin. Data was collected using valid instruments, metacognition skills tests (V = 0.98), student learning outcomes tests (V = 0.99), and non-tests to determine the process of implementing actions. Data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative descriptive techniques. The results of the study showed that (1) students' metacognitive skills increased from the category starting to develop to be well developed, (2) knowledge learning outcomes increased from the less to the good category, attitudes were in a good category, and skills were also in the skilled category in cycle II, (3) the implementation of the teacher in implementing the TBLDI model is very good, (4) the activity of students increases from being active in cycle I to being very active in cycle II.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Andersson-Bakken, E., Jegstad, K. M., & Bakken, J. (2020). Textbook tasks in the Norwegian school subject natural sciences: what views of science do they mediate? International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1320–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1756516

Arami, M., & Wiyarsi, A. (2020). The student metacognitive skills and achievement in chemistry learning: Correlation study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042005

Azizah, Suyono, & Suyatno. (n.d.). Desain dan validitas instrumen untuk mengukur keterampilan metakognitif mahasiswa dalam materi larutan. Seminar Nasional Kimia.

Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (2013). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV project. Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers: Results from the COACTIV Project, 1–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5

Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133

Buyukkarci, K. (2019). A critical analysis of task-based learning. January 2009.

Cakir, M. (2008). Constructivist approaches to learning in science and their implication for science pedagogy: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(4), 193–206.

Cervin-Ellqvist, M., Larsson, D., Adawi, T., Stöhr, C., & Negretti, R. (2021). Metacognitive illusion or self-regulated learning? Assessing engineering students’ learning strategies against the backdrop of recent advances in cognitive science. Higher Education, 82(3), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00635-x

Cook, E., Kennedy, E., & McGuire, S. Y. (2013). Effect of teaching metacognitive learning strategies on performance in general chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(8), 961–967. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300686h

Cooper, M. M., & Sandi-Urena, S. (2009). Design and validation of an instrument to assess metacognitive skillfulness in chemistry problem-solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(2), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p240

Costa, A. (2016). Task-Based Learning (TBL) and Cognition. E-TEALS, 7(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/eteals-2016-0010

Dawson, T. L. (2008). Metacognition and learning in adulthood. Prepared in Response to Tasking From, August, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2231.0649

Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J., & Glažar, S. A. (2009). Assessing 16-year-old students’ understanding of Aqueous solution at the submicroscopic level. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9077-2

Dori, Y. J., Avargil, S., Kohen, Z., & Saar, L. (2018). Context-based learning and metacognitive prompts for enhancing scientific text comprehension. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1198–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470351

Enggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2013). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms. (9th ed.). Pearson.

Espinosa, A. A., Monterola, S. L. C., & Punzalan, A. E. (2013). Career-oriented performance tasks: Effects on students’ interest in Chemistry. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 14(2).

Fleur, D. S., Bredeweg, B., & van den Bos, W. (2021). Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences. Npj Science of Learning, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00089-5

Hasanah, I., & Mitarlis. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Dengan Strategi Metakognitif Materi Koloid Kelas XI Semester Genap Di SMAN 2 Bangkalan. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 5(3), 588–595.

Hattie. (2012). Learning for Teachers. Routledge.

Herscovitz, O., Kaberman, Z., Saar, L., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). The relationship between metacognition and the ability to pose questions in chemical education. In Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (Vol. 40). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6_8

Hilton, A., & Nichols, K. (2011). Representational Classroom Practices that Contribute to Students’ Conceptual and Representational Understanding of Chemical Bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 33(16), 2215–2246.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.543438

Hopkins. (2011). Panduan guru penelitian tindakan kelas (A teacher’s guide to classroom research) (4th ed.). Pustaka Belajar.

Iskandar, S. M. (2014). Pendekatan Keterampilan Metakognitif Dalam Pembelajaran Sains Di Kelas. Erudio Journal of Educational Innovation, 2(2), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.18551/erudio.2-2.3

Khotimah, K., Susilaningsih, E., & Nurhayati, S. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Performance Assessment Berbasis Pembelajaran Kontekstual untuk mengukur Keterampilan Laboratorium Siswa. Chemistry in Educatiion, 6(2), 1–9. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/chemined

Kober. (2015). Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. National Academies Press.

Ku, K. Y. L., & Ho, I. T. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9060-6

Lavi, R., Tal, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002

Leny, Syahmani, Ningsih, F., & Sanjaya, R. E. (2020). Guided Inquiry Assisted Concept Map to Improve Students Metacognition Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012036

McDowell, L. D. (2019). The roles of motivation and metacognition in producing self-regulated learners of college physical science: a review of empirical studies. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2524–2541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1689584

Mezirow, J., Cottafava, D., Cavaglià, G., Corazza, L., Raikou, N., Chu, S. Y., Garcia, S., Schnitzler, T., Pappamihiel, N. E., Moreno, M., Mensah, F. M., Vatalaro, A., Szente, J., Levin, J., Buechner, B., Dirkx, J., Konvisser, Z. D., Myers, D., Peleg-Baker, T., … Wikan, G. (2019). Culturally responsive teaching efficacy beliefs of in-service special education teachers. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10(2), 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2019-0168

Mueller, A., & Brown, A. (2022). An evidence-based Approach to Tasks in Science Education: Meta Analytical and other Quantitative results. In Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Tasks in Science Education. https://doi.org/DOI.10.25321/prise.2022.1275

Muhali, Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. (2019). The validity and effectiveness of the reflective-metacognitive learning model in improving students’ metacognitive ability in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 33–74. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2019.16.2.2

Negretti, R. (2021). Searching for Metacognitive Generalities: Areas of Convergence in Learning to Write for Publication Across Doctoral Students in Science and Engineering. In Written Communication (Vol. 38, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320984796

Neidorf, Arora, Erberber, Tsokodayi, & Mai. (2020). Student Misconceptions and Errors in Physics and Mathematics: Exploring Data from TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced. Springer.

Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2013). Representing and Learning in Science. In Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 1–14). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-203-7.

Prasasti, H., Susilaningsih, E., & Sulistyaningsih, T. (2020). Development e-TBL to Analyze Critical Thinking Skills and Problem Solving in Learning of Substance and Characteristics. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(3), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v9i1.36844

Qin. (2017). Introduction to Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Acquisition. Beijing: Peking University Press.

Qing, Z., Ni, S., & Hong, T. (2010). Developing critical thinking disposition by task-based learning in chemistry experiment teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4561–4570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.731

Richard, A. (2012). Leraning to Teach. McGraw-Hill.

Schunk. (2012). Learning theory. An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Sengul, S., & Katranci, Y. (2012). Metacognitive Aspects of Solving Function Problems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(507), 2178–2182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.450

Syahmani, Hafizah, Sholahuddin, A., & Sauqina. (2023). Metacognitive Conceptual Change Learning Model: Promoting Students’ Conceptual Change through Metacognitive Skills, Motivation, and Scientific Knowledge. Frontier Psychology Sec. Cognition. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1045124

Syahmani, S., Iriani, R., Riana, S., & Bakti, I. (2022). E-Magazine Development with Social Emotional Learning Approach on Colloid Material in Context of Local Wisdom. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 7(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v7i2.11442

Syahmani, Saadi, P., Clarita, D., & Sholahuddin, A. (2021). Guided inquiry assisted by metacognitive questions to improve metacognitive skills and students' conceptual understanding of chemistry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012023

Syahmani, Suyono, & Imam Supardi, Z. A. (2020). Effectiveness of i-smart learning model using chemistry problem-solving in senior high school to improve metacognitive skills and students’ conceptual understanding. Pedagogika, 138(2), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2020.138.3

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3

Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, sub-micro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet.” International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435

Tekkumru-Kisa, M., Stein, M. K., & Doyle, W. (2020). Theory and Research on Tasks Revisited: Task as a Context for Students’ Thinking in the Era of Ambitious Reforms in Mathematics and Science. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20932480

Tekkumru-Kisa, M., Stein, M. K., & Schunn, C. (2015). A framework for analyzing cognitive demand and content-practices integration: Task analysis guide in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 659–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21208

Temel, S., Ozgur, S. D., Sen, S., & Yilmaz, A. (2012). The Examination of Metacognitive Skill Levels and Usage of Learning Strategies of Preservice Chemistry Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(2002), 1445–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.318

Tonia, A., & Ganta, G. (2015). the Strengths and Weaknesses of Task Based Learning (Tbl). Scholarly Research Journal For Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(16), 2760–2771. www.srjis.com

Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306

Veenman, M. V. J. (2012). Definitions, Constituents, and Their Intricate Relation with Cognition. Metacognition in Science Education, Trends in Current Research, 40, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6

Vrdoljak, G., & Velki, T. (2012). Metacognition and intelligence as predictors of academic success [Metakognicija i inteligencija kao prediktori školskog uspjeha]. Croatian Journal of Education, 14(4), 799–815. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84871866288&partnerID=40&md5=145c51d136760b7cbfddf4750546d4c6

Vrieling, E., Stijnen, S., & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Successful learning: balancing self-regulation with instructional planning. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(6), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1414784

Zepeda, C. D., Elizabeth Richey, J., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015). Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 954–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000022

Zhao, H. (2005). How Far Do the Theories of Task-Based Learning Succeed in Combining Communicative and from-Focused Approaches to L2 Research? Journal of Cambridge Studies, 4, 41–56.

Zhou, Q., Huang, Q., & Tian, H. (2013). Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills by Task-Based Learning in Chemistry ExperimentTeaching. Creative Education, 04(12), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.412a1006




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jvk.v38i1.13649

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 469 times
PDF - 294 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Vidya Karya

Indexed By

Creative Commons License

Vidya Karya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.