High School Physics Assessments in Bontang City: Fostering Higher-Order Thinking
Abstract
This research aims to determine the percentage of HOTS-level physics questions and the cognitive level and dimensions of knowledge of HOTS-level physics questions on the class X SMAN/MAN summative exam in Bontang. These questions were analysed based on Bloom's revised taxonomy: cognitive level and knowledge dimensions. The type of research used in this research is descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The subject of this research was four schools in Bontang city, including high schools A, B, C, and D. Data collection techniques use documentation techniques. The results of the research show that the percentage of HOTS-level physics questions is 12.2%, with the percentage of each question code being 5% for question code A, 15% for question code B, 20% for question code C, and 16% for question code D for cognitive level C4.In contrast, cognitive levels C5 and C6 are not found in the summative exam question document. The cognitive level in the summative exam questions includes C1 to C4 and factual, conceptual and procedural knowledge dimensions. The knowledge dimension in the HOTS level question is dominated by the procedural knowledge dimension, while there is only one question in the conceptual knowledge dimension. Future physics should consider the balance of cognitive level and dimension in school assessment.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, L. W & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives diterjemahkan oleh: Agung Prihantoro. New York: Longman.
Aflah, N. S., & Sunarti, T. (2022). Analisis soal fisika berbasis high order thinking skill dalam penilaian akhir tahun di sma. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 573–579. https://
doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.573-579
Andriani, Supriyatman, & Muslimin. (2020). Analisis soal higher order thinking skills (hots) bentuk essay yang dibuat oleh guru fisika sma di kota palu. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online (JPFT), 8(2), 95–98.
Anggraeni, C. D., Yunus, M., & Damayanti, P. (2023). Analisis soal latihan pada buku soal fisika kelas xi berdasarkan taksonomi bloom revisi dilihat dari prespektif higher order thinking skill pada pokok bahasanfluida. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1), 40–51.
Anita, A., Tyowati, S., & Zuldafrial, Z. (2018). Analisis kualitas butir soal fisika kelas x sekolah menengah atas. Edukasi : Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 35–47.
Direktorat pembinaan sekolah menengah atas kementerian budaya dan pendidikan. (2019). Modul penyusunan soal keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi (higher order thinking skills) Fisika. In Jakarta.
Erniyanti, E., Junus, M., & Syam, M. (2020). Analisis ranah kognitif soal latihan berdasarkan taksonomi bloom revisi pada buku fisika kelas x (studi pada buku karya ni ketut lasmi). Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika, 1(02), 115–123.
https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v1i2.337
Fahreza, R., Saadi, P., & Syahmani, S. (2018). Profil metakognisi siswa berdasarkan self -regulated learning (srl) dalam memecah kan masalah kimia. Jurnal Vidya Karya, 33(2), 118–130.
Fatmawati, S. (2013). Perumusan tujuan pembelajaran dan soal
kognitif berorientasi pada revisi taksonomi bloom dalam pembelajaran fisika. EduSains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematika, 1(6).
Ikhsan, A., Auliya, A., Sopiah, & Walid, A. (2019). Analisis kemampuan siswa menyelesaikan soal ujian nasional hots mata pelajaran fisika sma 10 kota bengkulu. Gravitasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Sains, 2(2), 34–41.
Jailani, J., Sugiman, S., Heri, H., Ezi, E., Hasan, H., & Zainal, Z. (2018). Desain pembelajaran matematika untuk melatihkan higher order thinking skills. UNY PRESS.
Lestari, T. P. (2021). Profil kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal higher order thinking skills (hots) ditinjau dari jenis kelamin. MATHEdunesa, 9(3), 570–578. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v9n3.p570-578
Oktarina, N., & Armariena, D. N. (2020). Analisis soal tipe higher other thingking skills (hots) pada tes objektif pilihan ganda usbn bahasa indonesia. Wahana Didaktika, 18(2), 146–156.
Pantiwati, Y., & Permana, F. H. (2017). Analisis butir soal oleh mahasiswa s1 pendidikan biologi universitas muhammadiyah malang (umm) berdasarkan pisa dan taksonomi bloom revisi. The Second Progressive and Fun Education Seminar), 707–716.
Pertiwi, F. N. (2021). Dimensi pengetahuan fkpm (faktual, konseptual, prosedural, dan metakognitif) mahasiswa ipa pada pembelajaran mekanika. Ibriez : Jurnal Kependidikan Dasar Islam Berbasis Sains, 6. https://doi.org/10.21154/ibriez.v6i1.146
Qadar, R. (2023). Using revised bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of questions in indonesian high school physics textbooks. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 3(1), 195–211.
Setiyoaji, W. T., Supriana, E., & Laksono, Y. A. (2020). Pengembangan e-book berbasis android dengan soal hots untuk membantu menganalisis besaran pada materi gerak lurus. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(1),114–120. https://doi.org/10.29
/jpft.v6i1.1725
Umacina, N. E. P., Mondolang, A. H., & Rondonuwu, I. T. (2020). Analisis butir soal sumatif semester ganjil mata pelajaran fisika. Charm Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika UNIMA, 1(2), 33–38.
Widana, I. W. (2017). Modul penyusunan soal higher order thinking skill (hots). jakarta: direktorat jenderal pendidikan dasar dan menengah departemen pendidikan dan kebudayaan. In Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jvk.v39i1.17675
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 90 timesPDF - 66 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Vidya Karya
Indexed By
Vidya Karya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.