Analisis Capaian dan Hambatan Dalam Penerapan Knowledge Management SECI Pada Yayasan Rumah Kreatif dan Pintar Kota Banjarmasin

Hetty Hyvia Widiyanti, Tomi Oktavianor

Abstract


This research intends to prove and analyze the achievements and obstacles in the implementation of knowledge management SECI studies on the Foundations of a House Creative and Smart.

The research method used is descriptive qualitative data collected in the form of words, images, and not the numbers of data, from this opinion described the descriptive study to obtain data may be derived from manuscripts, interviews, field notes, photos, video recordings, private documents, notes or memos, and other official documents. The technique of determination of informants in this study uses purposive sampling and
snowball sampling.

The results of the study found that the Implementation of the Conversion SECI will be optimal if it is supported by four supporting components, namely Knowledge, infrastructure / Facilities Support available, psychological, level of solidarity trust against members of the target, and tangible assets. If the supporting component is not owned, then the implementation of the Conversion SECI relative can still be done, just that it has the limitation and its purpose is not optimal.

Based on the discussion and findings above that in the application of knowledge management conversion SECI it is inseparable from the fourth process (Socialization, Externalization, Combination, and Internalization) everything was interrelated and continuous so that the achievement of a Foundation HouseCreative and Smart could be more effective. But in reality, that occurs the Foundation of the House Creative and Smart has the biggest obstacle during the process of combination because of the limitation of Knowledge in it. So, the next step of Internalization has not been able to effectively. But the overall inhibition of one process and have not being able to optimally continue the implementation of the next stage does not close the possibility
of the Foundation of the House Creative and Smart not able to implement the Conversion of SECI just still less effective.

Keywords: Achievements, Barriers, Implementation of Knowledge Management Conversion SECI, Socialization, Externalization, Combination, Internalization.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Assegaf, M., Wasitowati., 2015. Knowledge Sharing sebagai Sumber Inovasi dan Keunggulan Bersaing pada Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) Sektor Batik. Jurnal.

B. Gupta., L. S. Iyer., J. E. Aronson, 2000. Knowledge Management: Practices and Challenges, Industrial Management and Data Systems. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 17-21.

Barney, Jay. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Research article.

Buckman, Robert. 2004. Building a Knowledge – Driven Organization: Overcome resistance Free flow of idons, Turn Knowledge into new products and services, move to knowledge-based strategy. New York.

Chen, Jen Chung., Huang, Jing – Wen., Yung – Chang Hsiao. Knowledge management and innovativeness: The role of organizational climate and structure. International Journal.

Creswell, Jhon W. 2016. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dalkir, Kimiz. 2005. Knowledge Management in Practice and Theory. 2nd edition. Elsevier butterwoth.

Davenfort, Thomas, H. Successfu Knowledge Management Projects. Sloan Management Review. Vol. 2 No. 2

Davidson, Carl and Philip Voss. 2003. Knowledge Management, An Indroduction to Creating Advantage from Intelectal Capital.Vision Book. New Delhi.

Fernandez, I. B., & Sabherwal, R. 2010. Knowledge Management Systems and Processes. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

Groff & Jones (2003:2). What Holds The Modern Company Together, Harvard Buisiness Review,74 (p.133-48)

J.C. Thomas W.A. kellog T. Erickson. 2001. The knowledge management puzzle: Human and social factors in knowledge management. Journal.

Kumpikate, Vilmate (2008). Human Resource Denelopment in Learning Organization, Jounal of Business Economics and Management, 9:1, 25-31

Kreitner, Senge (2006). The Art and the practice of Learning Organization

Lina, Herlina. 2019. Analisis Kondisi Knowledge Management dikantor Setjen Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia. Jurnal.

Munir. Ningky Sasanti. 2008. Knowledge Management Audit Pedoman Evaluasi Kesiapan Organisasi Mengelola Pengetahuan. Jurnal.

Miles, B. Mathew dan Michael Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-metode Baru. Jakarta: UIP.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moorce, carol F. 1986. Understanding Entrepreneurial Behavior: A definition and Model. Academy of Management Proceedings.

Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation New York: Oxford University Press.

Prabowo, Hardjanto. 2010. Knowledge Management dalam Perguruan Tinggi. Binus Business Review. Vol 1 No. 2

Polany, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Garden city. New York.

Port, Thomas daven, 2010. Intruduction With Knowledge Management. London Academic University

Putra, Muh. Arvin., 2013. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi intensi Knowledge Sharing pada PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia Kanwil Makassar. Jurnal.

Rosenberg, Marc. J. 2001. E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in The Digital Age. USA: McGraw-Hill Companies

Sangkala. 2007. Knowledge Management. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Sveiby, Karl – Erik. 2001. A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm to guide Strategy Formulation. Journal.

Tiwana, Amrit. (2002). The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Orchestrating IT, Strategy and Knowledge. Platform 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

Tobing. 2007. Knowledge Management: Konsep, Arsitektur dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1995 Tentang Usaha Kecil.

Undang-Undang No 20 Tahun 2008 Tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM)

Whyte, Grafton, Classen, Selwyn., 2012. Using storytelling to elicit tacit knowledge from SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management.

Widayana, Lendy. 2005. Knowledge Management: Meningkatkan daya saing bisnis. Malang. Bayumedia Publishing

Wulantika, Lita. 2012. Knowledge Management dalam meningkatkan inovasi dan kinerja bisnis. Jurnal Ilmiah Unikom. Vol. No.2




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jbp.v11i1.13120

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 441 times
PDF - 1930 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed Jurnal Bisnis dan Pembangunan

             

 

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Bisnis dan Pemabangunan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. ISSN : 2541-1403 (print verson), E-ISSN : 2541-187X