Analisis Kepuasan Anggota Koperasi Serba Usaha Madani Kotabaru Dengan Metode IPA (Importance Performance Analysis)

Rosida Rosida, Hairudinor Hairudinor, Taharuddin Taharuddin

Abstract


The objectives of this study are (1) to determine member satisfaction of ‘Madani’ Business Multipurpose Cooperation, Kotabaru based on the level of need and level of performance in the dimensions of direct evidence (tangible), reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy, (2) to determine which attributes belong to the main priority and maintained, or the excessive low priority, (3)  to determine the width of the gap or gap between the importance and the performance of services.

This type of this research was descriptive quantitative. In this study the author compared the level of need with the level of performance in producing satisfaction. Data were collected using questionnaires, and the samples of 121 cooperative members were selected by accidental sampling. Data analysis used IPA (Importance Performance Analysis) and gap analysis.

The analysis result of the suitability level of the lowest attributes of the service quality was responsiveness (responsiveness) with the attribute of quick responsiveness in responding to complaints/ problems (87.71%), and the highest dimension was direct evidence (tangible) in the attributes of cleanliness and tidiness of office and employees (101.10%).

The analysis of Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) showed that there were four more dominant attibutes in quadrant B (Preserve Achievement) at IPA Cartesian diagram, as follows:

  1. 1.     Completeness, preparedness and cleanliness of equipments of ‘Madani’ Business Multipurpose Cooperation, Kotabaru (3)
  2. 2.     Knowledge and skills of tellers and customer service officers (9)
  3. 3.     Politeness and trustworthiness owned by the employees of  the office of ‘Madani‘ Business Multipurpose Cooperative, Kotabaru (10)
  4. 4.     Responsibility for the comfort of its members (12)

The highest value gap  was in the dimension of responsiveness with the value of -0.55. Meanwhile,  the lowest gap was the dimension of assurance with the value of -0.02. For the value gap (gap), the highest gap was quick response attribute in facing complaints/problems (7) with the value of -0.55, and the lowest gap was the attributes of cleanliness and tidiness of the office and employees (1) with the value of 0.05, and the service was fast, accurate, friendly and ready to help (6) with the value of 0.05.

 

Keywords: Cooperation member satisfaction, level of interest, level of performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Barata, Atep. D. (2001). Pelayanan Prima. Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta

Gaspersz, Vincent. (2003). Manajemen Bisnis Total - Total Quality Management. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Ghozali, Imam. (2001). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Gomes, Faustino Cardoso. (2000). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Penerbit Andi Offset, Jakarta.

Hermanto, Andi, W. (2004). ”Analisa Tingkat Kepuasan Konsumen Terhadap Pelayanan Terminal Peti Kemas Semarang”. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Hermawan, Boby. (2013). ” Analisa Tingkat Kepentingan Dan Kinerja (IPA) Atas Standarisasi Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepuasan Nasabah PT. Bank Kalsel Cabang Pembantu Nagara”. Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Banjarmasin.

Irawan, H. (2004). 10 Prinsip Kepuasan Pelanggan. Elex Media Komputindo,Jakarta.

Juwandi, Hendy Irawan. (2004). Kepuasan Pelayanan Jasa. Erlangga. Jakarta.

Koperasi Serba Usaha Madani. ”Profil Perusahaan”, Kotabaru.

Kotler, Philip. & Keller Kevin, L (2009). Manajemen Pemasaran Jilid I (13th ed.) (Bob Sabran, Penerjemah). Erlangga. Jakarta

Kotler, Philip. (2005). Manajemen Pemasaran Jilid I (11th ed.) (Benyamin Molan, Penerjemah). PT. Indeks. Jakarta

Laksana, Fajar. (2008). Manajemen Pemasaran. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.

Leonard L. Berry, Pasuraman. 1991. Marketing Service : Competiting Through Quality. The Free Press. New York.

Lupiyoadi, Rambat dan Hamdani, A. 2001. Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Semarang.

Malhotra, Naresh K. (2005). Riset Pemasaran. (Pendekatan Terapan).Terjemahan Soleh Rusyadi M. PT.Indeks Kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta.

Mangkunegara, A.A.Anwar Prabu. (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Martila, J.A. and J.C. James. (1997). Importance-Performace Analysis. Journal of Marketing 41, 77 - 79.

Mathis.L.Robert dan Jackson.H.John. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Terjemahan Jimmy Sadeli dan Bayu Prawira), Jilid 1; Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Mulyadin, Dedy (2004). ”Analisis Kualitas Jasa Pelayanan Pada PT. BNI’46 Cabang X Jakarta”. Universitas Gunadarma Jakarta.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan (2000). ”Statistik Terapan untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial”, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Sugiyono,. (2002). Statistik Untuk Penelitian. CV.Alfabeta, Bandung

Susanti, Lina (2004). ”Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Konsumen Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan (Studi Kasus : Hotel Sofyan Betawi Menteng Jakarta”. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Tjiptono, Fandy, (2005). Pemasaran Jasa, Bayu Media, Malang.

Zeithaml, V; Parasuraman, A and Berry, L., (1990). Delivery Quality Service Balancing Customer Perception and Expectation, USA.Free Pres Collier Macmillan Publish




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jbp.v7i1.4744

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 481 times
PDF - 229 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

      

 

    

 

 Flag Counterweb
analyticsPengunjung

 

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Bisnis dan Pemabangunan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. ISSN : 2541-1403 (print verson), E-ISSN : 2541-187X