Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Program Corporate Social Responsibility  PT. Arutmin Nort Pulau Laut Coal Terminal  Kotabaru (Studi Tentang Program Koperasi Serba Usaha Madani Kotabaru)

Muhdar Muhdar; Jamaludin Jamaludin; Irwansyah Irwansyah

doi:10.20527/jbp.v1i1.784

Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Program Corporate Social Responsibility PT. Arutmin Nort Pulau Laut Coal Terminal Kotabaru (Studi Tentang Program Koperasi Serba Usaha Madani Kotabaru)

Muhdar Muhdar, Jamaludin Jamaludin, Irwansyah Irwansyah

Abstract

In addition to contributing businesses, companies should also contribute socially through the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Many notions of CSR, but the essence is the company's commitment to positively impact and reduce the negative impacts of the company for the welfare of society and the environment by taking into account aspects of the triple bottom lines. PT Arutmin NPLCT is one company in Indonesia which is committed in implementing CSR. One of them is through the KSU Madani program.

This study used a qualitative approach is supported with quantitative data. The strategy used in this study is to describe a program by conducting interviews, observation and document analysis.

Selection of survey respondents do intentionally (purposive sampling), the number of respondents who are involved in the process of formation of KSU Madani is 21man. While the key informants is CD ComDev Dept. Officer.

Results showed that the image of the KSU program Madani at the planning stage (decision-making) in the KSU Madani program has been realized with the participation of civil society in the meetings. It is clearly visible and has been implemented in this KSU Madani program, participants had a high level of presence in each meeting so that they can take decisions together by consensus. During the implementation phase KSU Madani program participants not only participate in but also contribute ideas embodied in the form of initial equity cooperatives, and participation in the management of KSU Madani program. While on stage monitoring has been realized in the form of participation of the majority of participants in a cooperative supervisory position or not all participants can conduct surveillance or monitoring directly because of limitations in terms of duties and powers that have been agreed upon.

Level of community participation in the Program KSU Madani generally is high in planning and implementation, but at the stage of monitoring is low. Participation in planning and implementing high because in the process of planning the training program is conducted and decided by a meeting forum for dialogue with participants and communities involved in decision-making. While on stage due to lower monitoring not all participants can conduct surveillance program because of limited authority.

Keywords: Public Participation, Corporate Social Responsibility.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Achda, B. Tamam. 2006. Konteks Sosiologis Perkembangan Corporate Social Alfabeta.

Anonimus, 2011. Analisis Data Kualitatif.

Ancok. 2006. Program CSR Jangan Hanya Sementara. Majalah. Penyuluhan Sosial Sinar. No.130/Januari, 4, 2013.

Caroll, AB. 2003. Bussiness and Society, Ethics and Stakeholder Managament. Soauth-Western: Thomson

Caroll, AB. 2008. A Hystory of Corporaet Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices. dalam Crane A et al. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.

Depsos. 2005. Acuan Klasifikasi Tanggung jawab Sosial Perusahaan. Direktorat Peningkatan Peran Kelembagaan Sosial Masayarakat dan Kemitraan. Dirjen Pemberdayaan Sosial. Departemen Sosial RI.

Dewani, Anggari Pasha. 2009. Kebijakan, Implementasi dan Komunikasi Corporate Social Responsibilit (CSR) PT Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa Tbk. Fakultas Ekologi Manusia Departemen Sains. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Elkington, J. 1994. Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review 36, no. 2: 90-100.

Endro, M. 2007. CSR Bukan Sekedar Program Pengembangan Masyarakat. Lingkar Studi CSR.

George C. Edwards III dan Ira Sharkansky, The Policy Predicament: Making and Implementing Public Policy, (San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1978), h.2.

Handy, C. 2002. “What’s A Business for?” Harvard Business Review, 80 (12) : 49-56.

Hardinsyah. 2008. IPB Menyiapkan Program Khusus CSR. [Majalah]. Bisnis dan CSR: Reference for Decision Maker. 1(6): 158-165

Ife, Jim 1995. Community Development: Creating Community Alternatives, Vision, Analysis and Practice. Longman. Australia.

ISO International Standart Organization 26000. 2007. Guide on Social Responsibility Wibisono.

Yusuf. 2007. Membedah Konsep dan Aplikasi CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility. Gresik : Fascho Publishing.

J. Fred Springer, Policy Research; Concepts, Methods, and Application, (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1989), h. 19-24.

Jalal. 2010. Antara CSR, Pencapaian MDGs, dan Penghargaan dari MetroTv. Lingkar Studi Kampus CSR.

James E. Anderson, Public Policy Making, (New York: Holt, Rinehart and inston, 1998), cet. ke-3, h. 3.

Kamal F. 2012. Kebijakan dan Analisis Kebijakan.

Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup, 2011. Pedoman CSR Bidang Lingkungan. Jakarta.

Keraf, A. Sony. 1998. Etika Bisnis, Tuntutan dan Relavansinya, Jakarta: Kansius Kompetitif Perusahaan. Jurnal Sinergi (Kajian Bisnis dan Manajemen), Volume 6, No. 2, 2004, hal. 37-46.

Kriyantono, Rachmat. 2006. Teknik Praktis riset Komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

M. Irfan Islamy, Prinsip-Prinsip Perumusan Kebijaksanaan Negara. 1998.

Mangkuprawira TS dan Hubeis AV. 2007. Manajemen Mutu Sumberdaya Manusia. Bogor: Penerbit Gahlia Indonesia.

Matrizal, Ibni. 2005. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam program Pengelolan Sampah Pemukiman di Kota Banda Aceh-Naggroe Aceh Darussalam. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana. IPB. Bogor.

Pangestu, M. H. T. 1995. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Perhutanan Sosial (Studi Kasus: KPH Cianjur, Jawa Barat). Tesis. Pascasarjana. IPB. Bogor. PT Bumi Resourch Tbk.. Annual Report 2011. Jakarta: PT Bumi Resourch Tbk.

Rachman, Nurdizal M. et al. 2011. Panduan Lengkap CSR. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.

Rahman,.2011. Implementasi Corporate Social Responsibility sebagai Kenggulan Responsibility (CSR) dan Implementasinya di Indonesia. Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional: A Promise of Gold Rating: Sustainable CSR. Jakarta, 23 Agustus. Responsibility. Gresik : Fascho Publishing.

Rudito, Bambang dan Arif Budimanta. 2003. Metode dan Teknik Pengeloaan Community Development. Jakarta: Penerbit ICSD.

Rudito, Bambang; Melia Famiola. 2007. Etika Bisnis Dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Di Indonesia. Bandung: Rekayasa Sains.

Safitri, Ika. 2008. Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pengaturan Corporate Social Responsibilit (CSR) Pada Undang-undang No.40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana. Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Sedyono, Chrysanti. 2002. Etika Bisnis, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), dan PPM.

Sisworahardjo, Imam. 2008. Manfaat Pelatihan.

Sudarwan Danim, Pengantar Studi Penelitian Kebijakan, (Jakarta: PT. Bumi

Aksara, 2005), cet. ke-III, h. 20-23.

Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung:

Teddy, Tursia. 2011. Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Musrenbangdes di Kecamatan Montalat Kabupaten Barito Utara. Program Studi Magister Ilmu Pemerintahan Program Pazcasarjana. Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.

Thomas R. Dye, Understanding Public Policy, (New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc., 2005), h. 1

Utomo, Adji Satrio. 2010. Dampak Pelaksanaan Program Corporate Social Responsibilit (CSR) PT Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa Tbk. terhadap Masyarakat Lokal Fakultas Ekologi Manusia Departemen Sains dan Pengembangan Masyarakat. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Wibisono, Yusuf. 2007. Membedah Konsep dan Aplikasi CSR (Corporate Social

Yohanna, Desi. 2008. Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Program Corporate Social Responsibility ”Kampung Siaga Indosat”. Program Studi Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Masyarakat. Fakultas Pertanian. Institut Pertanian Bogor

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jbp.v1i1.784