PERLAKUAN PERMUKAAN PADA REPARASI RESIN KOMPOSIT DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP KUAT REKAT RESIN KOMPOSIT BARU–RESIN KOMPOSIT LAMA

Dewi Puspitasari, Ellyza Herda

Abstract


ABSTRACT
Composite resin that have been restored in the oral cavity ages over time and can be fail. The total removal of the restoration is the most common procedure that is often done in daily clinical practice. This procedure may be regarded as overtreatment if only small portions of the restoration has damaged, therefore repairing composite resin could be more effective choice. The bond strength of repairing composite resin can be improved by surface treatment. Surface treatment have been categorized in several method such as surface roughening with diamond bur, air abrasion (sand blasting) with aluminum oxide, chemical treatment (etching) with phosphoric acid or hydrofluoric acid, silane coupling agent and intermediate adhesive resin (adhesive system and flowable composite). The objective of this study was to discuss repairing aged composite resin, surface treatment method that have been practiced and the influence to bond strength of repaired composite resin based on published article. Combination between suface treatment methods will result different values in bonding strength. Up to recent there are no practice best methods yet, however combination air abrasion with adhesive system or with flowable composite improving bond strength that compared to composite resin bond strength without reparation.

 

ABSTRAK
Restorasi resin komposit didalam rongga mulut dapat mengalami kegagalan seiring dengan waktu. Prosedur perawatan yang sering dilakukan adalah mengganti restorasi secara keseluruhan. Prosedur ini dianggap berlebihan bila hanya sedikit bagian restorasi yang rusak, sehingga memperbaiki atau reparasi resin komposit menjadi pilihan yang lebih efektif. Kuat rekat resin komposit yang diperbaiki dapat ditingkatkan dengan perlakuan permukaan antara lain pengasaran permukaan dengan bur intan, abrasi udara (sand blasting) dengan aluminium oksida, perlakuan kimia (etsa) dengan asam fosforik atau dengan asam hidrofluorik, penggunaan silane coupling agent dan intermediate adhesive resin (sistem adhesif dan flowable composite). Tujuan dari penulisan makalah ini adalah untuk menelaah pustaka mengenai reparasi resin komposit, metode perlakuan permukaan yang dilakukan dan pengaruhnya terhadap kuat rekat reparasi komposit resin berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dipublikasikan. Kombinasi antara metode perlakuan permukaan menghasilkan nilai kuat rekat yang berbeda. Hingga saat ini belum ada metode perlakuan permukaan yang terbaik, tetapi kombinasi abrasi udara dengan sistem adhesif atau dengan flowable composite dapat menghasilkan kuat rekat yang sebanding dengan kuat rekat resin komposit tanpa reparasi.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Sakr OM, Almohaimeed M. Interference of preventive caries system with microshear bond strength of enamel surface bonded to etch & rinse or self etch adhesive system with nanofilled composite. Life Science Journal 2013;10(1):1984-87.

Murdoch-Kinch CA, Mclean ME. Minimally Invasive Dentistry. JADA 2003;134:87-95.

Tuncer D, Karaman E, Firat E. Does the Temperature of Beverages Affect the Surface Roughness, Hardness, and Color Stability of a Composite Resin? Eur J Dent 2013;7:165-71.

Rinastiti M, Özcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins. Clin Oral Invest 2011;15:625-33.

Özcan M, Cura C, Brendeke J. Effect of Aging Conditions on the Repair Bond Strength of a Microhybrid and a Nanohybrid Resin Composite. J Adhes Dent 2010;12(6):451-59.

Yousef MK, Khoja NH. Repair and Replacement Perception of Dental Restorations. JKAU: Med. Sci 2009;16(2):75-85.

Strassler HE. Increasing the Longevity of Restorations by Minimal Intervention: A Two Year Clinical Trial. Inside Dentistry 2009;5(5):1.

Gordan VV, Shen C, Riley J, Mjör IA. Two- Year Clinical Evaluation of Repair versus Replacement of Composite Restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006;18(3):144-53.

Hisamitsu N, Atsuta M, Matsumura H. Effect of Surface Conditioning Agents on the Repair Bond Strength of an Indirect Hybrid Composite. Int Chin J Dent 2002;2:5-14.

Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo JJ, Bush PJ. Evaluation of Varied Repair Protocols Applied to Aged Composite Resin. J Adhes Dent 2005;7(1):41-9.

Kashi TJ EM, Rakhshan V, Aghabaigi N, Tabatabaei F. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Oper Dent 2011:1-15.

Oztas N AA, Bardakçy Y. The effect of air abrasion with two new bonding agents on composite repair. Oper Dent 2003;28(2):149-54.

Cavalcanti AN, De-Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of Surface Treatments and Bonding Agents on the Bond Strength of Repaired Composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19(2):90-8.

Papacchini F, Radovic I, Magni E, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Chieffi N, et al. Flowable composites as intermediate agents without adhesive application in resin composite repair. American Journal of Dentistry 2008;21(1):53-58.

Joulaei M, Bahari M, Ahmadi A, Oskoee SS. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Repair Micro-shear Bond Strength of Silicaand Zirconia-filled Composite Resins J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2012; 6(4):131-37.

Papacchini F, Dall‘Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, et al. Composite-to- Composite Microtensile Bond Strength in the Repair of a Microfilled Hybrid Resin: Effect of Surface Treatment and Oxygen Inhibition. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:25-31.

Çelika EU, Ergücüb Z, Türkünc LS, Ercand UK. Tensile Bond Strength of an Aged Resin Composite Repaired with Different Protocols. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:359-66.

Costa TRD, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durrability of Composite Repair Using Different Surface Treatments. J Dent 2012;40(6):513-21.

de-Melo MAV, Moysés MR, dosSantos SG, Alcântara CEP, Ribeiro JCR. Effects of Different Surface Treatments and Accelerated Artificial Aging on The Bond Strength of Composite Resin Repairs. Braz Oral Res 2011;25(6):485-97.

Papacchini F, Monticelli F, Radovic I, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Tay FR, et al. The application of hydrogen peroxide in composite repair. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;82(2):298-304.

Kashi J, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, Aghabaigi N, Tabatabaei FS. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Oper Dent 2011;36(6):608-17.

Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2011;119:316–22.

Junior SAR, Ferracane JL, Bona ÁD. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dental Materials 2009;25(4):442-51.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/dentino.v1i1.420

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/dentino.v1i1.420.g343

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 299 times
PDF - 3225 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Contact Us:
Faculty of Dentistry
Lambung Mangkurat University
Jalan Veteran No. 128 B Banjarmasin, Indonesia
Telp/Fax. (0511) 3255444;

E-mail. fkg@ulm.ac.id / dentino.fkg@ulm.ac.id
Website. fkg.ulm.ac.id

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.