Presenteeism pada guru sekolah dasar

Nugraini Aprilia(1*)
(1) Program Studi Magister Psikologi Profesi, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.20527/ecopsy.2021.02.005

Abstract

Keterikatan yang terjalin antara guru sekolah dasar dengan siswa menyebabkan rendahnya keinginan para guru sekolah dasar untuk tidak bekerja saat mengalami masalah kesehatan atau kelelahan kerja. Keterikatan tersebut mendorong tingginya prevalensi presenteeism dengan banyak konsekuensi negatif yang mengikutinya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat pengaruh task significance, perceived supervisor support, dan conscientiousness terhadap presenteeism Guru Sekolah Dasar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah Guru Sekolah Dasar di Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung. Responden pada penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 177 Guru Sekolah Dasar. Alat ukur yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah skala likert. Pada penelitian ini presenteeism sebagai sebuah takaran produktivitas ketika bekerja dalam kondisi sakit diukur dengan menggunakan Work Limitation Questionnaire, sementara task significance diukur menggunakan Job Diagnostic Survey, perceived supervisor support diukur mengunakan sub-perceived supervisor support scale, dan dimensi conscientiousness diukur menggunakan The Big Five Inventory. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi berganda dengan bantuan program IBM SPSS. Hasil analisis data menemukan bahwa terdapat pengaruh task significance, perceived supervisor support, dan conscientiousness secara simultan terhadap presenteeism guru sekolah dasar.

Keywords


Conscientiousness; Persepsi Dukungan Atasan; Presenteeism; Signifikansi Tugas

References


Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K., & Dallner, M. (2000). Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. Journal of Epidemiol Community Health, 502-509. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.7.502

Badan Pusat Statistik. (n.d.). Median usia kawin pertama perempuan pernah kawin umur 25-49 menurut provinsi, 2012 dan 2017. Retrieved from Badan Pusat Statistik: https://www.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2018/06/06%2000:00:00/1445/median-usia-kawin-pertama-perempuan-pernah-kawin-umur-25-49-tahun-menurut-provinsi-2012.html

Bialowolski, P., McNeely, E., VanderWeele, T. J., & Weziak-Bialowolska, D. (2020). Ill health and distraction at work: Costs and drivers for productivity loss. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230562

Centre for Mental Health. (2011). Managing presenteeism: A discussion paper.

Chun, B.-Y., & Hwang, Y.-J. (2018). Gender, presenteeism, and turnover intention and the mediation effect of presenteeism in the workplace. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 4821-4836. https://acadpubl.eu/hub/2018-120-6/4/350.pdf

Cooper, C. L., Quick, J. C., & Schabracq, M. J. (Eds.). (2009). International handbook of work and health psychology 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Demerouti, P. M., Le Blanc, P. M., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hex, J. (2009). Present but sick: a three way study on job demands, presenteeism and burnout. Career Development International, 50-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910933574

Eisenberger, R., Sucharski, I. L., Rhoades, L., Stinglhamber, F., & Vandenberghe, C. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565

Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2008). Theories of personality. Pustaka Pelajar.

Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108

Senden, M. G., Schenck-Gustafsson, K., & Friedner, A. (2016). Gender differences in reason for sickness presenteeism - a study among GPs in a Swedish health care organization. Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 28-50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-016-0136-x

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1974). The job diagnostic survey: An instrument for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation of job redisign projects. New Haven: Departemen of Administrative Sciences of Yale University.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation Through The Design of Work: Test of A Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 250-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7

Hurlock, E. B. (2000). Development psychology: A life span approach 5th edition. McGraw-Hill.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John. (Eds.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.). Guilford.

Johns, G. (2010). Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 519-542. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.630

Johns, G. (2011). Attendance dynamics at work: The antecendents and correlates of presenteeism, abstenteeism, and productivity loss. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025153

Jourdain, G., & Venzina, M. (2014). How psychological stress in the workplace influences presenteeism propensity: A test of the demand-control-support model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 483-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2012.754573

Lack, D. M. (2011). Presenteeism revisited: A comprehensive review. AAOHN Journal, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.3928/08910162-20110201-02

Leineweber, C., Westerlund, H., Hagberg, J., Svedberg, P., Luokkala, M., & Alexanderson, K. (2011). Sickness presenteeism among Swedish Police officers. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9249-1

Lerner, D., Amick, B. C., Rogers, W. H., Malspeis, S., Bungay, K., & Cynn, D. (2001). The work limitation questionnaire. Medical Care, 39(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqn039

Ma, J., Meltzer, D. P., Yang, L.-Q., & Liu, C. (2018). Motivation and presenteeism: the why and whats. In C. L. Cooper, & L. Lu (Eds.), Presenteeism at Work (pp. 97-123). Cambridge University Press.

Prabarani, P. (2018). Pengaruh iklim keselamatan kerja dan big five personality terhadap perilaku keselamatan karyawan di PT. Terminal Teluk Lamong. (Tesis). Program Magister Psikologi Profesi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya.

Prameswari, G. A. (2019). Pengaruh karakteristik pekerjaan terhadap keterikatan kerja karyawan generasi Y melalui keseimbangan kehidupan-kerja sebagai mediator. (Tesis). Program Magister Psikologi Profesi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya.

Putri, V. A. (2017). Pengaruh persepsi dukungan atasan terhadap kepuasan kerja dengan keterikatan karyawan sebagai mediator di PT.PAL Indonesia. (Tesis). Program Magister Psikologi Profesi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya.

Quazi, H. (2013). Presenteeism: The invisible cost to organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.

RAND Corporation. (2015). Health, wellbeing and productivity in the workplace. RAND Europe.

Rasmussen, B., Sweeny, K., & Sheehan, P. (2016). Economic costs of absenteeism, presenteeism and early retirement due to ill health: A focus on Indonesia. Victoria Institute of Strategic Economic Studies.


Article Statistic

Abstract view : 183 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) views : 436 times

Dimensions Metrics

Article History

Submited : 14 March 2020
Published : 29 April 2021

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Nugraini Aprilia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.