STORM "GREEDY WATER" PALM OIL BASED ON ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE

Gusti Rusmayadi

Abstract


The tendentious issue of deforestation, biodiversity, "water greedy" attack ganoderma and carbon emissions continue to heat up in this decade has cornered palm plantations in Indonesia for allegedly either from outside or from inside the country becomes the base of why. To clarify these issues then this article aims to analyze the impact of oil palm plantations in terms of the water balance of plant oil palm. Water use in the oil palm plantations on average 92.05 mm/month or equivalent to 1104.5 mm/year over lamtoro stands is 3,000 mm/year, acacia 2,400 mm/year, sengon of 2,300 mm/year, amounting tea 900 mm/year, rubber amounted to 1,300 mm/year, bamboo amounted to 3,000 mm/year and teak amounted to 1,300 mm/year. The coefficient of oil palm crop of 0.93. The percentage amount of rainfall used palm oil amounted to only 39.60% of the annual rainfall. Percentage of evapotranspiration value is smaller than the value of evapotranspiration pine percentage of 64.5%, A. mangium 68.8%, amounting to 55.1% of ferns and eucalyptus (E.alba) amounted to 52.4%. Meanwhile, rubber plant has a value of 1 kc, other crops such as rice, during the period of growth has kc values between 1.05 to 1.2. Soil water content (KAT) which indicates the storage capacity of the root zone of oil lower than the root zone rubber (Rusmayadi, 2011). This is due to the oil more roots growing in the topsoil to a depth of ± 1 meter and as you go down the less. Rooting most densely contained at a depth of 25 cm. Therefore the ability of smaller savings in oil palm plantations compared to rubber, then the excess water will be removed or overflowed (Ro) is not taken ("greedy water") by palm trees. Palm oil as a commodity to be seen objectively with regard to the nature of biological (plant roots), physiological (crop coefficient), and environmental (water storage capacity). This is to straighten out the problems that it is not water but greedy oil plantation management who do not pay attention to aspects of water conservation.


Keywords


content; crop coefficient; evapotranspiration; soil water; water balance; water greedy; water use

Full Text:

PDF

References


Coster, C. (1938). Superficial Run-off and Erosion In Java. Tevtona, 31: 613-728.

Doorenbos, J., & Kassam, A. H. (1986). Yield Response to Water. FAO Irigation and Dranage Paper no 33. Rome. 193p.

Harahap, I. Y. (1999). Pendugaan Kebutuhan Air untuk Pertaumbuhan Kelapa Sawit d i Lapang dan Aplikasinya dalam Pengembangan Sistem Irigasi. Indonesian Journal of Oil Palm Research, 7(2):87-104

Rusmayadi, G. (2011). Dinamika kandungan air tanah di areal perkebunan kelapa sawit dan karet dengan pendekatan neraca air tanaman. Agroscientiae, 18(2), 86-93. ISSN 0854-2333.

Pasaribu, H., Mulyadi, A., & Tarumun, S. (2013). Neraca Air di Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di PPKS Sub Unit Kalianta Kabun Riau. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 6(2). ISSN 1978-528.

Pujiharta. (1995). Beberapa Indikator Fisik Untuk Menentukan Kebijaksanaan Pendahuluan Dalam Pengelolaan DAS. Proceedings Lokakarya Pengelolaan Terpadu Daerah Aliran Sungai, Jakarta, 26-27 Mei 1981. p. 383-398.

Widodo. (2011). Estimasi Nilai Lingkungan Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Ditinjau Dari Neraca Air Tanaman Kelapa Sawit. [Karya Ilmiah]. Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. IPB. Bogor.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/es.v14i1.4891

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 378 times
PDF - 57 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
EnviroScienteae is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

ISSN : 2302-3708 (Online version)  ISSN : 1978-8096 (Print version)

Program Studi Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan
Program Pascasarjana Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
Kampus ULM Banjarbaru Gedung 1 Lantai II
Jalan Ahmad Yani Km 36 Banjarbaru Kode Pos 70714
Tel / fax : (0511) 4777055 / (0511) 4777055
email : psdal.unlam@gmail.com