OPTIMALISASI DESAIN SURVEI SEISMIK BERDASARKAN DATA EVALUASI TEKNIS DAN PARAMETER YANG TERSEDIA DALAM SOFTWARE MESA
Abstract
ABSTRACT. Seismic data acquisition is done to get a recording of seismic data. The quality of seismic data judged from a comparison between the amount of reflection signals received by signal interference received. Three-dimensional seismic survey (3D) provides an overview of the subsurface geology accuracy better than seismic two- dimensional (2D). Seismic three-dimensional (3D) generally require a higher cost than the two-dimensional (2D) because the density of the firing point and the receivers more. Making the seismic survey design into a solution of a problem before conducting seismic exploration for exploration which was preceded by design rarely meet with failure and have a positive impact in optimizing the configuration of the spread as well as aspects of the economy. Of the four designs seismic surveys that have been made and the discussions it was found that all the firing patterns, to the desired target has been able to meet the desired targets. Firing patterns have value slanted fold better than firing patterns orthogonal, brick, and the patch because it has a value greater fold. Firing patterns patch is firing patterns are more suitable for shallow penetration compared with the three other designs, but in terms of the cost will be more expensive. Of the four firing patterns that have been made can be concluded that the firing patterns of brick is more objective in terms of both data and the distribution of funds will be issued.
KEYWORDS: seismic, seismic survey design, firing patterns
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baldock, S., R.T. Cristina, B. Beck, W. Gao, J. Cai, & S. Hightower. 2012. Orthogonal Wide Azimuth Surveys: Acquisition and Imaging. Technical Article. 30:40– 41.
Cordsen, A., dkk. 2000. Planning Land 3D Seismic Surveys, Geophysical Developments No.9. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
Edi, S.S., A. Chaniago, A.D. Guntara, & A.A. Susanto. 2011. Optimalisasi 2 Desain Dalam 1 Survey Seismic 3D : Studi Kasus Seismic 3D Randegan Utara PT Pertamina EP. The 36th HAGI and 40th IAGI Annual Convention and Exhibition, Makassar.
Evans, B.J. 2005. A Handbook for Seismic Data Acquisition in Exploration, Number 7. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
Gadallah, M.R., & Fisher, R. 2009.Exploration Geophysics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Hastari, W., & B.J. Santosa. 2014. Desain Parameter Akuisisi Seismik 3D Menggunakan Metode Statik dan Dinamik dengan Study Kasus Model Geologi Lapangan “ITS”. Jurnal Sains Dan Seni Pomits. 3: 84 – 85.
ION Geophysical Corporation. 2011. Survey Design and Services. GX Technology, 225 East 16th Ave Denver.
Vermeer G.J.O. 2002. 3D Seismic Survey Design Volume 12. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
Singh, P.K., M.K. Gupta, V., P,Kara., P.K. Paul & R. Dasgupta. 2010. 3D Seismik survey using swath or patch-centered shooting: A comparative analysis. 8th Biennial International Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics. 316: 4 –5.
Telford, W.M., L.P. Geldart, & R.E. Sheriff. 1990. Applied Geophysic. Edisi ke-2. Cambridge University Press, London.
Yilmaz, O. 2001. Seismic Data Analysis Volume I. Societyof Exploration Geophysic.Tulsa.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/flux.v13i1.1917
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 1854 timesPDF - 4670 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Fisika Flux

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Association with:
Indexed by:

Jurnal Fisika FLux: Jurnal Ilmiah FMIPA Universitas Lambung Mangkurat is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.










