Static Stress Transfer from The 2010 Mw 7.8 Sinabang Earthquake and Its role in Triggering the Mw 7.2 Meulaboh Event
Abstract
This study investigates the mechanical relationship between the 6 April 2010 Sinabang earthquake (Mw 7.8) and the subsequent 9 May 2010 Meulaboh earthquake (Mw 7.2) along the Sumatra–Andaman Subduction Zone (SASZ) using static Coulomb Stress Change (ΔCFS) analysis. Earthquake source parameters and focal mechanisms were obtained from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) catalog. Aftershock sequences associated with the Sinabang earthquake were identified using the Gardner and Knopoff declustering algorithm, while fault geometry was constrained using focal mechanism solutions and empirical scaling relationships. Static stress transfer was modeled using Coulomb 3.3 assuming a homogeneous elastic half space. The results indicate that the Sinabang earthquake generated a positive ΔCFS lobe extending toward the Meulaboh segment, with stress increases penetrating the seismogenic depth range of approximately 20–40 km. Receiver-fault analysis yielded positive ΔCFS values of 0.022 bar and 0.011 bar for Meulaboh Nodal Plane 1 (NP1) and Nodal Plane 2 (NP2), respectively, with NP1 showing better agreement with the regional tectonic setting and aftershock distribution. Validation using 107 aftershocks showed that 63 events (58.88%) occurred within positive ΔCFS regions, supporting a spatial association between stress increase and postseismic seismicity. Although the calculated stress perturbations remain below the commonly adopted static triggering threshold of 0.1 bar (0.01 MPa), the positive ΔCFS values suggest that static stress redistribution may have increased the failure potential of the Meulaboh fault. The 33-day interval between the Sinabang and Meulaboh earthquakes further implies that additional time-dependent postseismic processes may have influenced the timing of fault failure, although these mechanisms were not explicitly modeled in this study. These findings highlight the probabilistic nature of earthquake interactions within active subduction systems and provide insights for future investigations of delayed earthquake triggering and seismic hazard assessment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asmaniar, Affandi, A. K., Sailah, S., Ardiansyah, S., & Wafiazizi, M. (2019). An analysis of Coulomb stress change and triggering interaction toward seismic activities in the area West Sumatera within January 2000-June 2018. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1282(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1282/1/012036
Dieterich, J. (1994). A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99(B2), 2601–2618. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB02581
Freed, A. M. (2005). Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic, and postseismic stress transfer. In Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences (Vol. 33, pp. 335–367). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122505
Gardner, J. K., & Knopoff, L. (1974). Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 64(5), 1363–1367.
Ishibe, T., Ogata, Y., Tsuruoka, H., & Satake, K. (2017). Testing the Coulomb stress triggering hypothesis for three recent megathrust earthquakes. In Geoscience Letters (Vol. 4, Number 1). SpringerOpen. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-017-0070-y
Kame, N., Fujita, S., Nakatani, M., & Kusakabe, T. (2013). Earthquake cycle simulation with a revised rate- and state-dependent friction law. Tectonophysics, 600, 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.11.029
King, G. C. P., Stein, R. S., & Lin, J. (1994). Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(3), 935–953.
Kusumawati, D., Sahara, D. P., Nugraha, A. D., & Puspito, N. T. (2019). Sensitivity of static Coulomb stress change in relation to source fault geometry and regional stress magnitude: case study of the 2016 Pidie Jaya, Aceh earthquake (Mw = 6.5), Indonesia. Journal of Seismology, 23(6), 1391–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09878-3
Kusumawati, D., Sahara, D. P., Widiyantoro, S., Nugraha, A. D., Muzli, M., Imran, I., Puspito, N. T., & Zulfakriza, Z. (2021). Fault Instability and Its Relation to Static Coulomb Failure Stress Change in the 2016 Mw 6.5 Pidie Jaya Earthquake, Aceh, Indonesia. Frontiers in Earth Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.559434
Ma, K. F., Chan, C. H., & Stein, R. S. (2005). Response of seismicity to Coulomb stress triggers and shadows of the 1999 Mw=7.6 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003389
McCaffrey, R. (2009). The tectonic framework of the sumatran subduction zone. In Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences (Vol. 37, pp. 345–366). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100212
Schäfer, A. M., & Wenzel, F. (2019). Global megathrust earthquake hazard—maximum magnitude assessment using multi-variate machine learning. Frontiers in Earth Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00136
Sieh, K., & Natawidjaja, D. (2000). Neotectonics of the Sumatran fault, Indonesia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 105(B12), 28295–28326. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900120
Sinaga, G. H. D., Loeqman, A., Siagian, R. C., & Sinaga, M. P. (2022). Analysis of Coulomb Stress Changes in Aceh Earthquake on Sibayak Volcano. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 8(2), 217–227.
Stein, R. S. (1999). The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence. In NATURE (Vol. 402). www.nature.com
Sukrungsri, S., Khamsiri, S., & Pailoplee, S. (2024). Investigation of co-seismic stress and aftershock distribution along the Sumatra–Andaman subduction zone. Geoscience Letters, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-024-00366-2
Toda, S., Stein, R. S., Richards‐Dinger, K., & Bozkurt, S. B. (2005). Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California: Animations built on earthquake stress transfer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110(B5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003415
Toda, S., Lin, J., Meghraoui, M., & Stein, R. S. (2008). 12 May 2008 M= 7.9 Wenchuan, China, earthquake calculated to increase failure stress and seismicity rate on three major fault systems. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(17).
Toda, S., Lin, J., & Stein, R. S. (2011). Using the 2011 M w 9.0 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake to test the Coulomb stress triggering hypothesis and to calculate faults brought closer to failure. Earth, Planets and Space, 63(7), 725–730. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.05.010
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2026). ANSS Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog (ComCat). Retrieved June 15, 2026, from https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/
Wells, D. L., & Coppersmith, K. J. (1994). New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement. In Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (Vol. 84, Number 4). https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0840040974
Widiyantoro, S., Supendi, P., Rawlinson, N., Daryono, M. R., & Rosalia, S. (2024). A note on the seismicity of Sumatra, western Sunda Arc, Indonesia, in relation to the potential for back-arc thrusting. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64076-7
Wulandari, R., Chan, C. H., & Wibowo, A. (2023). The 2022 Mw6.2 Pasaman, Indonesia, earthquake sequence and its implication of seismic hazard in central-west Sumatra. Geoscience Letters, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-023-00279-6
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/flux.v23i2.26145
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 50 timesPDF - 76 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Fisika Flux: Jurnal Ilmiah Fisika FMIPA Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Association with:
Indexed by:

Jurnal Fisika FLux: Jurnal Ilmiah FMIPA Universitas Lambung Mangkurat is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.










