Studi Uji Kesesuaian Selisih Lapangan Kolimasi pada Pesawat Mammografi Analog dan Digital

Fitriani Fitriani; Bualkar Abdullah; Dahlang Tahir

doi:10.20527/flux.v16i2.6344

Studi Uji Kesesuaian Selisih Lapangan Kolimasi pada Pesawat Mammografi Analog dan Digital

Fitriani Fitriani, Bualkar Abdullah, Dahlang Tahir

Abstract

Study of collimation field difference suitability test on analog and digital mammography at leading hospital in Makassar from 2016-2018. This test was carried out by using four coins of the same size placed on the edge of the collimator lamp field, one different size coin was placed on the table edge of the chest wall section, and one coin was placed on the surface under the compression pedal to coincide with the edge of the chest wall. The results of the p value obtained for each measurement point, both for the difference of the light collimation field toward the X-ray beam and the difference of X-ray beam collimation field toward image receptor have the same value of 0.000 (p < 0.05). This value states that there are significant differences in the collimation field difference from 2016-2018. The results of collimation field difference suitability test on analog and digital mammography are still within the tolerance limits recommended by BAPETEN, for the difference of the light collimation field toward X-ray beam ≤ 1% SID and the difference of X-ray beam collimation field toward image receptor ≤ 2% SID. This shows that mammography is feasible and able to operate safely for patients and non-patients.

Keywords

Analog; collimation; digital; mammography; X-ray.

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Dabukke, H. (2018). Pengujian Iluminasi, Kolimasi, Ketegaklurusan, dan Kualitas Berkas Pesawat Sinar-X Radiografi Umum dengan Radiografi Mobile. Tesis. Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Dasril, D. N. (2018). Uji Kesamaan Berkas Cahaya Kolimasi Pesawat Sinar-X Konvensional Merk Showa Type Tco-1 Di Rsud Sungai Dareh Kab. Dharmasraya. Menara Ilmu, 12(10), 47-51.

Kunosic, S., Zerem, E., Kunosic, S., & Kicic, E. (2018). Risk Assessment From Ionizing Radiation In Mammography. Journal Posebna izdanja, 51, 94-101.

Nguyen, C. P., & Adang, E. M. M. (2018). Cost-Effectiveness Of Breast Cancers Creening Using Mammography Invietnamese Women. Journal Plos One, 13(3), 1-7.

Nur, I. M. (2014). Mammography Sceerening pada Kanker Payudara dengan Generalized Structured Component Analysis. Statistika, 2(1), 26-33.

Peraturan Kepala Badan Pengawas Tenaga Nuklir (BAPETEN) Republik Indonesia No. 2 Tahun 2018. (2018). Uji Kesesuaian Pesawat Sinar-X Radiologi Diagnostik dan Intervensional. BAPETEN. Indonesia.

Putra, D., K., Santoso, I., & Zahra, A. A. (2009). Identifikasi Keberadaan Kanker Pada Citra Mammografi Menggunakan Metode Wavelet Haar. Jurnal Teknik Elektro, 11(2), 100-106.

Pwamang, C., Sosu, E., Schandorf, C., Boadu, M., & Hewlett, V. (2016). Assessment of Dose to Glandular Tissue of Patients Undergoing Mammography Examinations. Journal of Radiology & Radiation therapy, 4(2), 1-5.

Ramli, M. (2015). Update Breast Cancer Management Diagnostic And Treatment. Jurnal Kedokteran Andalas, 38, 28-53.

Safitri, R., & Yufita, E. (2017). Quality Control X Rays Mammography In The Effort Mitigation Increasing Number Of Cancer Patients. Jurnal Natural, 17(1), 45-48.

Santoso, W. B., Santoso, B., Sukandar, & Susila, I. P. (2015). Pengatur Catu Daya Tegangan Tinggi Perangkat Mammografi Mx-13 Berbasis Pulse Width Modulation. Jurnal Perangkat Nuklir, 9(2), 91-101.

Sidabutar, S. (2012). Kontrol Kualitas Sistem Mamografi Digital: Direct Radiography (DR). Skripsi. Universitas Indonesia.

Traino, A. C., Sottocornola, C., Barca, P., Marini, C., Aringhieri, G., Caramella, D., & Fantacci, M. E. (2017). Average absorbed breast dose in mammography: a new possible dose index matching the requirements of the European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM. European Radiology Experimental, 1(28), 1-8.

Zira, J. D., & Nzotta, C. C. (2018). Radiation Doses for Mammography and its Relationship with Anthropo-Technical Parameters. International Journal of Radiology & Radiation Therapy, 5, 15-19.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/flux.v16i2.6344