INTERFACE FRICTION OF SMOOTH GEOMEMBRANES AND OTTAWA SAND
Abstract
Geomembranes commonly used in civil engineering constructions are mostly in contact with soils. Some constructions failed due to slippage between geomembrane sheets and interfacing soils. This paper aims at presenting the interface strength of various geomembranes and Ottawa sand resulting from tests with the ring shear device. The interface strength is generally governed by the stiffness, the texture of geomembranes and the imposed stress level. It was found that residual friction angles, dresidual, for the interfaces varied from 10.5° to 28.1° or 0.34 to 0.97 in efficiency ratio. The lower value is for a smooth HDPE, the higher value is mobilised by a soft PVC at higher stresses.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bosdet, B. W. 1980. The UBC Ring Shear Device, Civil Engineering Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Bowles, Joseph E. 1997. Foundation analysis and design. Fifth ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Das, Braja M. 2007. Principles of foundation engineering. Sixth ed. Canada: Thomson.
Druschel, S. J., and T. D. O'Rourke. 1991. Shear Strength of Sand-Geomembrane Interface for Cover System and Lining Design. Paper read at Geosynthetics'91 Conference, at Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.
GFR. 1993. Specifier's Guide. Geotechnical Fabric Report.
Ingold, T. S. 1991.Friction Testing, Geomembranes Identification and Performance Testing.In Report of Technical Committee 103 MGH Mechanical and Hydraulic Testing of Geomembranes, edited by A. Rollin and J. M. Rigo. Cambridge, Great Britian: RILEM.
Koerner, Robert M. 1990. Designing with geosynthetics. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Martin, J. P., R. M. Koerner, and J. E. Whitty. 1984. Experimental Friction Evaluation of Slippage BetweenGeomembranes, Geotextiles and Soils. Paper read at International Conference of Geomembranes, at Denver, U.S.A.
Negussey, D., Wijewickreme, W. K. D., and Vaid, Y. P. 1988.On Geomembrane Interface Friction. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.
O'Rourke, T. D., and S. J. Druschel. 1990. "Shear Strength Characteristics of Sand-Polymer Interfaces." Journal of Geotechnical Engineering no. 116 (5):451-469.
Rinne, N. F. 1989. Evaluation of Interface Friction between Cohesionless Soils and Common Construction Materials, Civil Engineering Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Sarsby, R. W. 2007. Geosynthetics in Civil Engineering. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing Limited.
Seed, R. B., Mitchell, J. K., and Seed, H. B. . 1988. Slope Stability Failure Investigation: Kettleman Hills Repository Landfill Unit B-19, Phase I A. Berkeley, California: University of California.
Weiss, W., and C. Batereau. 1987. "A Note on Planar Shear BetweenGeosynthetics and Construction Materials." Geotextiles and Geomembranes no. 5:63 - 67.
William, N. D., and M. Houlihan. 1986. Evaluation of Friction Coefficients between Geomembranes, Geotextiles and Related Products. In The Third International Conference on Geotextile. Vienna, Austria.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/infotek.v12i1.1779
DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/infotek.v12i1.1779.g1551
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 236 timesPDF - 97 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 INFO-TEKNIK
This work is licensed under a�Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.�
Indexed By:
Citation :
SINTA 6 mulai Vol. 19 No. 2 2018 (SK NO. 164/E/KPT/2021)GOOGLE SCHOLAR : Sitasi = 78, H-index = 5, i10-index = 2
IPI :� Artikel = 100
IOS 3969 : Artikel = 239
�