Strengthening the Pedagogical Competence of English Education Students through Information Gap Activities Design Training

Sirajuddin Kamal, Novita Triana, Elvina Arapah, Muhammad Rizky Kusuma Dewa, Zidyah Ahadiyah, Mohamed Ebrahim

Abstract


The low English proficiency among the Indonesian society is partly influenced by the dominance of learning approaches that focus on grammar and vocabulary memorization, thereby limiting students' opportunities to use the language in meaningful communication. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) is an approach that emphasizes language use for authentic communication purposes, with information gap activities (IGA) serving as one of the primary techniques to foster classroom interaction. This community service activity aims to enhance the pedagogical competence of pre-service English teachers in designing and implementing CLT-based IGA. The activity was conducted using the Participatory Action Research (PAR) method, involving students from the English Education Study Programs at Universitas Sari Mulia and Universitas Lambung Mangkurat. The needs analysis results indicated that most participants lacked an adequate understanding of the IGA concept and still tended to employ traditional, teacher-centered learning activities. Through this training, participants gained an understanding of CLT principles and skills in designing communication-oriented activities centered on information exchange. Following the training, participants were capable of developing and practicing various information gap activities, such as Jigsaw Reading, Missing Schedule, and Spot the Differences, integrated into communicative learning scenarios. The questionnaire results demonstrated that this training strengthened the pedagogical competence of pre-service English teachers in designing communicative, interactive, and student-centered learning. Therefore, similar training needs to be conducted sustainably to support the quality improvement of communicative English language learning. 


Keywords


Communicative language; English education; Pedagogical competence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Chang, A. N., & Suparmi. (2024). The implementation of communicative language teaching (CLT) and factors hindering teachers from implementing it in high school. Al-TA’DIB: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, 17(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.31332/atdbwv13i1.1598

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.

Defrioka, A. (2017). The use of information gap activities in teaching speaking: A classroom action research. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 10(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v10i2.6418

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Longman.

Hidayat, F. (2020, November 18). Kecakapan bahasa Inggris SDM Indonesia dinilai masih rendah. BeritaSatu.

https://www.beritasatu.com/news/700179/kecakapan-bahasa-inggris-sdm-indonesia-dinilai-masih-rendah

Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/327317

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). Sage Publications.

Lembang, Y. C. D., Ardiyani, D. K., & Muyassaroh, L. U. (2021). Efektivitas model pembelajaran Information Gap Activity Normalism (IG-AN) terhadap keterampilan berbicara peserta didik kelas X SMA. Journal of Language, Literature, and Arts, 1(3), 356–368.

Li, C. (2025). Negotiating meaning via communication strategies: EFL learners’ behavior in peer interaction. Behavioral Sciences, 15(7), 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070976

Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.4.319

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

Meilasari, T. A., Rofi’i, A., Kustini, T., & Herdiawan, R. D. (2023). Integrating cooperative learning in EFL classroom to alleviate students’ speaking fluency anxiety. International Journal of Language Education and Cultural Review, 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijlecr.v9i2.37859

Putri, D. (2025). How communicative language teaching enhances student engagement in ESL classrooms. Education Library, 1(2), 84–93. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edlib/article/view/41144

Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Ridwan, M. N., Ramli, & Samanhudi, U. (2024). The implementation of communicative language teaching in EFL classes: A case study on the border of Indonesia–Malaysia. EduInovasi: Journal of Basic Educational Studies, 5(1), 112–125. https://dx.doi.org/10.47467/edu.v4i2.2635

Santri, S. (2022). An analysis of students’ motivation to speak through information gap task activities. Al-Lughawiyaat, 3(2).

Singh, P. K. K., & Chan, X. W. (2022). Information gap tasks: Motivating and encouraging talk in English classrooms. Practitioner Research, 4, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.32890/pr2022.4.2

Sujinem. (2023). Analysis of implementation of communicative approach in teaching English under Kurikulum Merdeka. Revorma: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran, 1(1), 45–55.

Suryani, L., & Widhiyanto. (2022). Students’ motivation in learning English in Indonesia: A critical review. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(2), 447–461.https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i2.4392




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/btjpm.v8i2.17617

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat is licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

From March 27, 2020 to June 3, 2020
View My Stats

From Juni 4, 2020 to the present (updated stats)
View My Stats

hit counter