Pelatihan Pembelajaran STEAM bagi Guru IPA SMP di Kalimantan Timur

Shelly Efwinda, Riskan Qadar, Nita Rananda, Fanzuruni Fauhatun Mabrurah, Rahman Setiyawan

Abstract


Tujuan Pelatihan Pembelajaran STEAM bagi Guru IPA SMP di Kalimantan Timur adalah agar guru dapat memiliki keterampilan membuat proyek pembelajaran IPA jenjang SMP dan sederajat dengan mengintegrasikan bidang Science, Technology, Engineering, Art. dan Mathematics. Pelatihan diselenggarakan selama lima hari, mulai tanggal 22 hingga 26 Juni 2021 dan diikuti oleh 10 guru IPA SMP dan sederajat di Kalimantan Timur. Indikator keberhasilan kegiatan dirumuskan: 1) 80% peserta atau sebanyak 8 peserta hadir dalam pelatihan, 2) terlaksananya seluruh kegiatan pelatihan, 3) 70% peserta atau sebanyak 7 peserta mampu membuat proyek STEAM dan menyusun laporan; serta 4) respon positif dari peserta kegiatan. Instrumen yang digunakan antara lain soal pre-test dan post-test pemahaman pembelajaran berbasis STEAM serta angket respon peserta. Adapun tahapan pelaksanaan kegiatan pelatihan meliputi: 1) Tahap persiapan; 2) Tahap pelaksanaan; 3) Tahap monitoring, evaluasi dan pelaporan. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan kegiatan pelatihan mencapai seluruh indikator keberhasilan kegiatan yaitu: 1) seluruh peserta yang diundang hadir dalam pelatihan yaitu sebanyak 10 orang, 2) seluruh kegiatan pelatihan dapat terlaksana sesuai jadwal, 3) 80% peserta mampu membuat proyek dan menyusun laporan yaitu sebanyak 8 orang, serta 4) diperoleh respon positif dari peserta kegiatan, hasil angket respon berada pada kategori sangat baik dengan persentase sebesar 95%.

 

The purpose of the STEAM Learning Training for Junior High School Science Teachers in East Kalimantan is to have the skills to create science learning projects by integrating the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, Art. and Mathematics. The training was held for five days, from 22 to 26 June 2021 and was attended by ten junior high school science teachers in East Kalimantan. The indicators for the success of the activities were formulated: 1) 80% of participants or as many as 8 participants attended the training, 2) the implementation of all training activities, 3) 70% of participants or as many as 7 participants were able to do STEAM projects and compile reports, and 4) positive response from activity participants. The instruments used include pre-test and post-test questions on understanding STEAM-based learning and participant response questionnaires. Implementing the training activities includes 1) Preparation stage; 2) Implementation stage; 3) Monitoring, evaluation and reporting stages. The results of the evaluation show that the training activities achieved all indicators of activity success, namely: 1) all participants invited to attend the training were 10 participants, 2) all training activities were carried out according to schedule, 3) 80% of participants were able to do projects and compile reports, which amounted to 8 participants, and 4) a positive response was obtained from the activity participants, the results of the response questionnaire were in the very good category with a percentage of 95%.

 


Keywords


Guru IPA; SMP; STEAM

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boice, K. L., Jackson, J. R., Alemdar, M., Rao, A. E., Grossman, S., & Usselman, M. (2021). Supporting teachers on their STEAM journey: A collaborative STEAM teacher training program. Education Sciences, 11(3), 105.

Boice, K. L., Jackson, J. R., Alemdar, M., Rao, A. E., Grossman, S., & Usselman, M. (2021). Supporting teachers on their STEAM journey: A collaborative STEAM teacher training program. Education Sciences, 11(3), 105.

Chiang, C. L., & Lee, H. (2016). The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Learning Motivation and Problem-Solving Ability of Vocational High School Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(9), 709–712. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.779

Hsiao, P. W., & Su, C. H. (2021). A study on the impact of STEAM education for sustainable development courses and its effects on student motivation and learning. Sustainability, 13(7), 3772.

Indriyanti, N. Y., Kartika, E. F. R., & Susanti, E. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perception in integrating STEAM in chemistry learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2331(April), 0–5. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041842

Kartini, D., & Widodo, A. (2020). Exploring elementary teachers’, students’ beliefs and readiness toward STEAM education. Elementary School Forum (Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 7(1), 58–69.

Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547–552.

Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. … Education. stemeducationjournal.springeropen …. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6

Liliawati, W., Rusnayati, H., & Aristantia, G. (2018). Implementation of STEAM education to improve mastery concept. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 228(1), 012148. Retrieved from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012148/meta

Lin, C., Huang, J., & Lin, R. (2021). From steam to cheer: A case study of design education development in taiwan. Education Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040171

Lin, T. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). Differentiating the sources of Taiwanese high school students’ multidimensional science learning self-efficacy: An examination of gender differences. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9579-x

Ozkan, G., & Umdu Topsakal, U. (2021). Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM design processes on middle school students’ creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09547-z

Sulaeman, N. F., Putra, P. D. A., Mineta, I., Hakamada, H., Takahashi, M., Ide, Y., & Kumano, Y. (2021). Exploring student engagement in STEM education through the engineering design process. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 7(1), 1–16.

Taylor, P. C. (2016). Why is a STEAM curriculum perspective crucial to the 21st century?

Wandari, G. A., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Agustin, R. R. (2018). The Effect of STEAM-based learning on students’ concept mastery and creativity in learning light and optics. Journal of Science Learning, 2(1), 26–32.

Yuni, S., Sahyar, & Bukit, N. (2021). Analysis the components of Science, Technology, Engineering, Art and Mathematics (STEAM) in senior high school physics textbook. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012118




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/btjpm.v3i4.4074

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat is licensed under
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

From March 27, 2020 to June 3, 2020
View My Stats

From Juni 4, 2020 to the present (updated stats)
View My Stats