Sosialisasi dan Pelatihan Pembelajaran STEM IPA-Kimia Berkonteks Lahan Basah pada MGMP IPA-Kimia se Kabupaten Banjar
Abstract
Pendekatan STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) menunjang proses pembelajaran dan mendukung tercapainya kompetensi di abad 21 dan perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi. Kegiatan pengabdian pada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman guru tentang konsep dan implementasi pembelajaran STEM IPA-Kimia berkonteks lahan basah. Sasaran kegiatan ini adalah guru-guru MGMP IPA/Kimia yang berada pada wilayah Kabupaten Banjar Kalimantan Selatan sebagai mitra dalam pelaksanaan kegiatan pelatihan dan pendampingan pengembangan kegiatan pembelajaran kimia berbasis STEM di SMA sesuai tuntutan kurikulum 2013. Kegiatan ini dilakukan dengan metode ceramah, diskusi, dan tanya jawab. Materi sosialisasi dan pelatihan terdiri dari: (1) Pendekatan pembelajaran STEM IPA-Kimia berkonteks lahan basah, (2) desain perangkat pembelajaran meliputi silabus, RPP, LKPD, dan alat evaluasi, (3) contoh video atau simulasi implementasi pembelajaran STEM IPA-Kimia berkonteks lahan basah. Melalui kegiatan sosialisasi dan pelatihan ini peserta akan dapat menggunakan pembelajaran STEM IPA-Kimia sebagai sebuah strategi pembelajaran kimia di kelas.
They used the STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) approach to support the learning process and support the achievement of competencies in the 21st century and the development of science and technology. This community service activity aims to increase teachers' understanding of the concept and implementation of STEM Science-Chemistry learning in a wetland context. The targets of this activity are MGMP Science/Chemistry teachers located in the Banjar Regency, South Kalimantan, as partners in the implementation of training activities and assistance in developing STEM-based chemistry learning activities in high school according to the demands of the 2013 curriculum. This activity uses lecture, discussion, and question and answer methods. The socialization and training materials consist of: (1) STEM Science-Chemistry learning approach in the context of a wetland, (2) the design of learning devices including syllabus, lesson plans, student worksheet, and evaluation tools, (3) an example of a video or simulation of the implementation of STEM Science-Chemistry learning in a wetland context. Through this socialization and training activity, participants will be able to use STEM Science-Chemistry learning as a chemistry learning strategy in the classroom.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ayuningtyas, P., Soegimin, W. W., & Supardi, I. A. (2015). Pengambangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika dengan model inkuiri terbimbing untuk melatihkan keterampilan proses sains siswa sma pada materi fluida statis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains UNESA, 4(2), 636–647.
Barroca, A., & Soares, J. (2017). Design thinking mindset applied to education and training. INTED2017. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.1988
Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12, 23–37.
Bell, S. (2010). Project Based Learning for the 21th Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House, 83, 39–43.
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning. Sense Publishers.
Crotty, E. A., Guzey, S. S., Roehrig, G. H., Glancy, A. W., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Moore, T. J. (2017). Approaches to integrating engineering in STEM units and student achievement gains. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER, 7(2), 1– 14. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1148
Cunningham, C. M., & Lachapelle, C. P. (2014). Designing engineering experiences to engage all students. Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices, 21(7), 117–142.
English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(14), 0027–7.
Gustiani, I., Widodo, A., & Suarma, I. R. (2017). Development and validation of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) based instructional material. AIP Conference Procedings, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983969
Habibi, M., Zainuddin, Z., & Misbah, M. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran ipa fisika berorientasi kemampuan pemecahan masalah menggunakan model pengajaran langsung pada pokok bahasan tekanan di smp negeri 11 banjarmasin. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v5i1.2234
Hartini, S., Mariani, I., Misbah, M., & Sulaeman, N. F. (2020). Developing of students worksheets through STEM approach to train critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(4), 42029.
Hernandez, P. R., Bodin, R., Elliott, J. W., Ibrahim, B., RamboHernandez, K. E., & Chen, T. W. (2014). Connecting the STEM dots: measuring the effect of an integrated engineering design intervention. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24, 107–120.
Irmawati, I., Syamsuri, S., Nindiasari, H., & ... (2021). Analisis Kebutuhan E-modul Matematika SMP Berbasis Teori Polya Pada Materi Segiempat. … : Jurnal Penelitian Dan …. https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/7026/
Jang, H. (2015). Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1
Jiwanto, I. N., Sugianto, S., & Khumaedi, K. (2017). Pengaruh implementasi model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing kooperatif jigsaw terhadap keterampilan proses sains siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Vetran, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v1i1.511
Kholifah, I. N., Maryanto, A., & Widodo, E. (2018). Pengaruh pembelajaran ipa berbasis stem terhadap sikap ingin tahu dan keterampilan berpikir kreatif peserta didik smp. E-Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 1(3).
Laboy-Rush, D. (2010). Integrated STEM education through project-based learning.www.learning.com/stem/whitepaper/ integrated-STEM-through Project-based-Learning.
Leny, L., Syahmani, S., Ningsih, F., & Sanjaya, R. E. (2020). Guided Inquiry assisted concept map to improve students’ metacognitive skills. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser, 12036.
Maslyni, M., Zaini, M., & Syahmani, S. (2018). The Effectiveness of natural science modules toward critical thinking ability and student performance: A development research. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME, 8(2), 29–33.
Meidawati, Y. (2014). Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa smp. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 1(2), 2356–3915.
Moore, T. J., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Kersten, J. A. (2015). NGSS and the landscape of engineering in K‐12 state science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 296–318.
Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. (2009). An evaluation of a behavioural parenting intervention for parents of gifted children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(6), 463–470.
Moundridou, M., & Kaniglonou, A. (2008). Using LEGO MINDSTORMS as an instructional aid in technical and vocational secondary education: Experiences from an empirical case study. In P. Dillenbourg & M. Specht (Eds.), Times of Convergence. Techno-logies across Learning Contexts (pp. 312–321). Springer.
OECD. (2017a). PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework: Reading, Mathematics and Science. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2017b). PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework (READING, MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE). OECD Publishing, 1(1), 1–180.
Oktavia, R. (2019). Bahan ajar berbasis science, technology, engineering, mathematics (stem) untuk mendukung pembelajaran ipa terpadu. Semesta: Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 2(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.24036/semesta/vol2-iss1/40
Pahrudin, A., Misbah, M., Alisia, G., Saregar, A., Asyhari, A., Anugrah, A., & Susilowati, N. E. (2021). The effectiveness of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics-inquiry learning for 15-16 years old students based on K-13 Indonesian curriculum: The impact on the critical thinking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 681–692. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.681
Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design Thinking: An Educational Model towards Creative Confidence. First International Conference on Design Creativity, 1–8.
Ridho, M., H, ., Wati, M., Misbah, M., & Mahtari, S. (2020). Validitas Bahan Ajar Gerak Melingkar Berbasis Authentic Learning di Lingkungan Lahan Basah untuk Melatih Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 5(2), 5(2), 87–98.
Sanjaya, W. (2006). Pembelajaran dalam implementasi kurikulum berbasis kompetensi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Scheer, A., & Plattner, H. (2011). Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8–19.
Schwarz, C. V, & Gwekwerere, Y. N. (2006). Using a guided and modeling instructional framework (eima) to support preservice k-8 science teaching. Science Education, 9(1).
Skaggs, P., Fry, R., & Howell, B. (2009). Innovations Unlimited: Thinking About Design Thinking. The NCIIA 13th Annual Meeting, 2009.
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (4 th ed). Allyn & Bacon.
Sukmana, R. (2018). Implementasi pendekatan STEM untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Primaria Educationem, 1(2), 113–119.
Syahmani, S, Saadi, P., Clarita, D., & Sholahuddin, A. (2021). Guided inquiry assisted by meta-cognitive questions to improve metacognitive skills and students’ conceptual understanding. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser, 1760 012023.
Syahmani, Syahmani, Hafizah, E., Sauqina, S., Adnan, M. bin, & Ibrahim, M. H. (2021). STEAM Approach to Improve Environmental Education Innovation and Literacy in Waste Management: Bibliometric Research. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 3(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i2.12782
Thersia, V., Arifuddin, M., & Misbah, M. (2019). Meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah melalui pendekatan somatis auditori visual intelektual (SAVI) dengan model pengajaran langsung. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1).
Torlakson. (2014). A Blueprint for STEM In California Public Education. https://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ca/sc/docu-
Veerasinghan, K., Balakrishnan, B., Damanhuri, M. I. M., & Gengatharan, K. (2021). Design Thinking for Creative Teaching of Chemistry. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 670–687.
Watson, A. D. (2015). Design Thinking for Life. Art Education, 68(3), 12–18.
Yani, M., Mastuang, M., & Misbah, M. (2021). Development of Solid Elasticity Modules with Guided Inquiry Model to Train Critical Thinking Skills. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal, 4(1), 44–56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/btjpm.v4i1.4415
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed by: Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat is licensed under From March 27, 2020 to June 3, 2020 From Juni 4, 2020 to the present (updated stats) |











