Pelatihan Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Berbasis Literasi untuk Guru
Abstract
Kemampuan guru dalam mengajarkan dan menilai kemampuan literasi perlu terus ditingkatkan mengingat banyak guru yang masih kesulitan dalam hal asesmen kemampuan literasi. Pengabdian ini bermaksud untuk memberikan pelatihan kepada guru dalam hal pengembangan instrumen asesmen literasi. Pengabdian ini menggunakan pendekatan proyek dengan metode utama yaitu tutorial dan praktik langsung yang dilaksanakan pada bulan Oktober 2021. Berdasarkan hasil angket, 88% guru setuju bahwa pelatihan memberikan tambahan pengetahuan mengenai literasi. 83% menyatakan setuju bahwa pelatihan ini memberikan dampak positif pada peningkatan kompetensi guru dalam hal menyusun instrumen asesmen literasi. Selain itu, 81% guru setuju bahwa pelatihan serupa perlu dilaksanakan kembali dengan topik yang berbeda. Instrumen asesmen hasil pelatihan ini divalidasi secara mandiri oleh peserta dan 68 dari 89 peserta (76%) instrumen asesmen yang dihasilkan memili kevalitan 61-80% dari seluruh soal yang dihasilkan. Dengan demikian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa pelatihan pengembagan instrumen asesmen berbasis literasi untuk guru ini telah berhasil membuat guru guru lebih kreatif dalam menyusun instrumen asesmen berbasis literasi, jenis soal lebih variatif, dengan validitas dan reliabilitas yang terjamin. Dengan demikian, diharapkan siswa akan lebih terlatih dan kompeten dalam bidang literasi.
The teacher's ability to teach and assess literacy skills needs to be continuously improved, considering that many teachers still have difficulties assessing literacy skills. This service intends to train teachers in terms of developing literacy assessment instruments. This service uses a project approach, with the main technique being tutorials and hands-on practice, which will be held in October 2021. Based on the questionnaire results, 88% of teachers agree that the training provides additional knowledge about literacy. 83% agreed that this training positively improved teacher competence in terms of preparing literacy assessment instruments. In addition, 81% of teachers agreed that similar training should be re-implemented with a different topic. The participants independently validated the assessment instrument resulting from this training, and for 68 of the 89 participants (76%), the resulting assessment instrument had a validity of 61-80% of all questions generated. Thus, the training in developing literacy-based assessment instruments for teachers has provided additional knowledge, increasing teacher competence in preparing literacy assessment instruments.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anisah, G. (2018). Validitas instrumen asesmen menulis cerpen terintegrasi pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 15–25.
Anisah, G. (2021). Kerangka konsep assessment of learning , assessment for learning , san assessment as learning. Al Aufa, 03(2), 65–76.
Anwar, K., & Rizqi, M. A. (2016). Validity and reliability analysis of assessment for customer satisfaction at university of muhammadiyah gresik. Didaktika, 22(2), 141–152.
Clements, M. D., & Cord, B. A. (2013). Assessment guiding learning: Developing graduate qualities in an experiential learning programme. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.609314
Dichter, M. (2015). Inter-rater Reliability of the Qol-measure QUALIDEM. BMC Nursing, 21(3), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-14-S1-S12
Dinni, H. N. (2018). HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) dan kaitannya dengan kemampuan literasi matematika. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 170–176.
Goldin, I. M., Lynn, R., & Ashley, K. (2015). Validity and reliability of an instrument for assessing case analyses in bioengineering ethics education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(3), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9644-2
Haerudin. (2019). Pengaruh literasi numerasi terhadap perubahan karakter siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika (Sesiomadika), 1(1a).
Indriyani, V., Zaim, M., Atmazaki, A., & Ramadhan, S. (2019). Literasi baca tulis dan inovasi kurikulum bahasa. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.vol5.no1.108-118
Kearney, R. A., Puchalski, S. A., Yang, H. Y. H., & Skakun, E. N. (2002). The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of a new Canadian oral examination format in anesthesia is fair to good. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 49(3), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020520
Kemendikbud. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Numerasi. In Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Vol. 8, Issue 9).
Kusuma, M. D., Rosidin, U., Abdurrahman, A., & Suyatna, A. (2017). The Development of Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Instrument Assessment In Physics Study. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 07(01). https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701052632
Nur, H. M., & Fatonah, N. (2022). Paradigma kompetensi guru. Jurnal PGSD UNIGA, 1(1), 12–16.
Poerwanti, J. I. S., & Winarni, R. (2021). Pelatihan dan pendampingan merancang instrumen assessment for learning berbasis portofolio pada guru-guru sekolah. Jurnal Widya Laksana, 10(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.23887/jwl.v10i1.28423
Rohim, D. C., Rahmawati, S., & Dyah Ganestri, I. (2021). Konsep asesmen kompetensi minimum untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi numerasi siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Varidina, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v33i1.14993
Shrotryia, V. K., & Dhanda, U. (2019). Content validity of assessment instrument for employee engagement. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018821751
Subakti, H., Oktaviani, S., & Anggraini, K. (2021). Implementasi gerakan literasi sekolah pada masa pandemi covid-19 dalam meningkatkan minat baca siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2489–2495. https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu/article/view/1209
Syahri, A. A., & Ahyana, N. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi menurut teori anderson dan krathwohl. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v1i1.16
Yusron, E., & Sudiyatno, S. (2021). How is the impact of Assessment for Learning (AfL) on mathematics learning in elementary schools? Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v9i1.34865
Zeynep Enkavi, A., Eisenberg, I. W., Bissett, P. G., Mazza, G. L., MacKinnon, D. P., Marsch, L. A., & Poldrack, R. A. (2019). Large-scale analysis of test–retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(12). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818430116
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/btjpm.v4i4.5613
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed by: Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat is licensed under From March 27, 2020 to June 3, 2020 From Juni 4, 2020 to the present (updated stats) |