TINJAUAN PERUBAHAN SISTEM PENGANGGARAN BERBASIS KINERJA DI INDONESIA

Suryanto Suryanto, Poni Sukaesih Kurniati

Abstract


This study aims to analyze changes in the performance-based budgeting system. The method used in this research is descriptive method with a qualitative approach. Data collection techniques using the study of literature. The results show that the budgeting system changes because, in the traditional budgeting system, there are many weaknesses in its implementation. The change of the budget system from the traditional budget system to a performance-based budgeting system was marked by the issuance of Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance. In reality, it turns out that the application of the performance-based budgeting system is still far from what was expected. There are several difficulties in implementing a performance-based budgeting system, namely the problem of agreeing on appropriate performance measures. Therefore, the implementation of a performance-based budgeting system is only limited to meet the provision.



References


Andriani, W., & Hatta, E., 2012. Analisis Penerapan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Pada Pemerintah Pusat (Studi pada Politeknik Negeri Padang). Jurnal Akuntansi & Manajemen, 7(1), 24-3.

Anthony, R.N. and Govidarajan, V., 2003. Management Control Systems. 11th edition, McGraw Hill.

Bastian, Indra., 2010. Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT Erlangga.

Basri, R., 2013. Analisis Penyusunan Anggaran dan Laporan Realisasi Anggaran Pada BPM-PD Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 1(4).

Baswir, R., 2000. Akuntansi Pemerintahan Indonesia. BPFE Yogyakarta.

Brownell, P., & McInnes, M., 1986. Budgetary participation, motivation, and managerial performance. Accounting review, 587-600.

Dobell, Peter & Martin Ulrich., 2002. Parliament’s performance in the budget process: A case study. Policy Matters 3(2): 1-24

Freeman, Robert J. & Craig D. Shoulders., 2003. Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting– Theory and Practice. Seventh edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Guilding, C., Cravens, K. S., & Tayles, M., 2000. An international comparison of strategic management accounting practices. Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 113-135.

Halim, Abdul dan Muhammad Syam Kusufi. 2014. Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi Akuntansi Sektor Publik Dari Anggaran Hingga Laporan Keuangan, Dari Pemerintah Hingga Tempat Ibadah. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Indrawati, N., 2016. Penyusunan anggaran dalam era new publik management: Implementasinya di Indonesia. JRAB: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Bisnis, 10(2).

Kennis, I., 1979. Effect of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Attitudes an Performances. The Accounting Review: 707-721.

Key, V.O., 1940. The lack of budgetary theory. American Political Science Review 34 (December), dalam Shafritz, Jay M. & Albert C. Hyde. 1997. Classics of Publik Administration. Fourth edition. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publisher.

Kurrohman, T., 2013. Evaluasi penganggaran berbasis kinerja melalui kinerja keuangan yang berbasis value for money di kabupaten/kota di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 5(1).

Lee, Robert D. Jr. & Ronald W. Johnson., 1998. Publik Budgeting Systems. Sixth edition. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc.

Mulyadi., 2001. Akuntansi Manajemen – Konsep, Manfaat, dan Rekayasa, Edisi 3, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Rubin, Irene S., 1993. The Politics of Publik Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and Balancing. Second edition. Chatam, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.

Samuels, David., 2000. Fiscal horizontal accountability? Toward theory of budgetary “checks and balances” in presidential systems. University of Minnesota, working paper presented at the Conference on Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies, University of Notre Dame, May.

Setyawan, A., & Rohman, A., 2013. Pengaruh partisipasi anggaran terhadap kinerja manajerial dengan mediasi komitmen organisasi dan kecukupan anggaran (studi empiris pada Satuan Kerja di Wilayah Pembayaran Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara Solok). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 204-215.

Von Hagen, Jurgen., 2002. Fiscal rules, fiscal institutions, and fiscal performance. The Economic and Social review 33(3): 263-284.

Young, R. D., 2003. Performance-based budget systems. Publik Policy and Practice, 2(2), 11-24 .




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jpp.v1i2.2441

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

  

 

 

 

Web Analytics

Flag Counter