PERBEDAAN KEPEMILIKAN PSIKOLOGIK PEMILIK RUMAH BERPAGAR DAN TIDAK DI PERUMAHAN TIDAK BERPAGAR SERTA BERPAGAR DI PERUMAHAN BERPAGAR
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Brown, G., & Zhu, H. (2016). ‘My workspace, not yours’: the impact of psychological ownership and territoriality in organizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 54-64.
Cséfalvay, Z. (2011). Gated communities for security or prestige? a public choice approach and the case of budapest. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(4), 735-752.
Cséfalvay, Z. (2011). Searching for economic rationale behind gated communities: a public choic e approach. Urban studies, 48(4), 749- 764.
Kustamar, Iskandar, T., & Wijaya, I. (2013). Faktor- faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap permintaan perumahan tipe cluster pada perumahan palem asri di kota jombang. Jurnal info manajemen proyek, 04.
Marcus, C. C. (1995). House as a mirror of self.
Conari Press : Barkley, California
Pierce, J. L., & Jussila, I. (2011). Psychological ownership and the organizational context: Theory, research evidence, and application. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K.T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 26(02), 298-310.
Sakip, S. R. M., Johari, N., & Salleh, M. N. M. (2013). Perception of safety in gated and non- gated neighborhoods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 383-391.
Turner, J. C. (1968). Housing priorities, settlement patterns, and urban development in modernizing countries. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34(6), 354-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jk.v1i1.1456
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Muhammad Hifzi Maula, Hemy Heryati Anward, Rusdi Rusli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.