PROFIL METAKOGNISI SISWA BERDASARKAN SELF-REGULATED LEARNING (SRL) DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH KIMIA

Rizki Fahreza, Parham Saadi, Syahmani Syahmani

Abstract


Abstract.  This research aims to (1) know the student’s metacognitive charactersitics in solving chemistry problem, especially based on Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) and (2) identify the factors influence student’s SRL capability. Research design used in this research was one-shot case study with pre-test. The research sample was the 11th grade students of Science classroom chosen by purposive sampling method. The instruments were pre-test, post-test, and Metacognition Self Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). The data were collected by test, observation, dan questionnaire. Analysis method used descriptive analysis. The finding of this research showed that (1) the low metacognitive students show the such characteristics;  tend to explained problem unclearly, couldn’t formulate problem correctly, explained planning and monitor the strategy unclearly, could’t imlpement the strategy and and less detailed in explain evaluation result. On the contrary, the higher metacognitive students had the such characteristics like could explain the problem more clearly, could formulate the problem exactly, could explain planning and monitor the strategy more detailed, could implement the strategy properly, and could explained evaluation result more detail; (2) there are fourt main factors that influence student’s SRL capability, that are cognitive strategy, student’s intrinsic value, self-efficacy, and anxiety.

 

Keywords: metacognitive skill, problem solving, SRL, colloid

 

Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui (1) karakteristik metakognisi siswa dalam memecahkan masalah kimia koloid berdasarkan Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) dan (2) mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kemampuan siswa dalam penerapan model pembelajaran SRL. Rancangan penelitian yang digunakan adalah one-shot case study with pre-test. Sampel penelitian yaitu peserta didik kelas XI IPA yang ditentukan melalui metode purposive sampilng. Instrumen penelitian berupa tes, lembar observasi  dan kuesioner MSLQ. Analisis data menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) siswa yang metakognisinya rendah memiliki karakteristik seperti; kurang jelas mengungkapkan permasalahan, kurang tepat merumuskan rumusan masalah, kurang rinci mengungkapkan perencanaan, kurang rinci dalam pemantauan strategi, kurang mampu menerapkan strategi, dan kurang rinci mengungkapkan hasil evaluasi. Adapun siswa yang metakognisinya lebih tinggi memiliki karakteristik seperti mampu mengungkapkan permasalahan dengan jelas, mampu merumuskan masalah dengan tepat, mampu mengungkapkan perencanaan dan cara pemantauan strategi dengan rinci, mampu menerapkan strategi dengan baik, dan rinci dalam mampu mengungkapkan hasil evaluasi; (2) terdapat 4 faktor utama yang mempengaruhi kemampuan siswa dalam model pembelajaran SRL, yakni strategi kognitif, nilai intrinsik siswa, self-efficacy, dan kecemasan.

 

Kata kunci: Keterampilan metakognisi, pemecahan masalah, SRL, koloid

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anggo, M. (2012). Pemecahan Masalah Matenatika Kontekstual Untuk Meningkatkan Metakognisi Siswa. Edumatica, 1(2), 35-42.

Bandura, A. (1991). Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50(2), 248-287.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring, A New Area of Cognitive: Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Hasanah, I., & Mitarlis. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Dengan Strategi Metakognitif Materi Koloid Kelas XI Semester Genap di SMAN 2 Bangkalan. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 5(3), 588- 595.

Hidayati, S., & Syahmani. (2016). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Metakognisi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Penggunaan Model Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) Pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam. Quantum, 7(2), 139-146.

Iskandar, S. M. (2014). Pendekatan Keterampilan Metakognitif dalam Pembelajaran Sains di Kelas. Erudio, 2(2), 13-20.

Moehnilabib, M. M., Mukhadis, A. D., Ibnu, S. D., Suparno, D., Rofi'udin, A. D., & Sukarnyana, I. W. (2003). Dasar-Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Malang: Penerbit Universitas Negeri Malang.

Muna, K., Sanjaya, R. E., Syahmani, & Bakti, I. (2017). Metacognitive Skills and Students’ Motivation toward Chemical Equilibrium Problem Solving Ability: a Correlational Study on Students of XI IPA SMAN 2 Banjarmasin. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1911(1), 1-7.

Munawaroh, H., & Sugiarto, B. (2014). Profil Metakognisi Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Kelarutan dan hasil Kali Kelarutan Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 3(3), 193-200.

Olakanmi, E. E., & Gumbo, M. T. (2017). The Effects of Self-Regulated Learning Training on Students’ Metacognition and Achievement in Chemistry. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(2), 34–48.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.

Polya, G. (1958). How to Solve It (2nd ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing Self-Regulation Skills: The Important Rule of Homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(1), 194-218.

Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The Role of Metacognition in Learning Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 915-920.

Sen, S. (2016). The Relationship Between Secondary School Students' Self-Regulated Learning Skills And Chemistry Achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 312-325.

Thibodeaux, J., Deutsch, A., Kitsantas, A. & Winsler, A. (2016). First-Year College Students’ Time Use: Relations With Self-Regulation and GPA. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(1), 5-27.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jvk.v33i2.5561

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1159 times
PDF - 951 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Vidya Karya

Indexed By

Creative Commons License

Vidya Karya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.