PERBANDINGAN RESPON GEDUNG SETBACK DAN NON-SETBACK DI BAWAH BEBAN GEMPA
Abstract
In this analysis, there are four building models with structure irregularity variations at the same conditions and location as a comparison. Model 1 is a building without vertical irregularities or non-setbacks, while the other three models are setback buildings. The building location for this analysis is Hulu Sungai Utara District in very soft soil site class (E) because the earthquake risk in this location tends to be greater than in other South Kalimantan districts.
As the results of this comparative analysis based on the base shear, displacement, and drift values, the best model is model 4, which is a setback building, because the output values are smaller compared to the other three model's output. This result is due to the mass reduction in the setback building model because of vertical geometry irregularity by 150% in the x direction and 366% in the y direction.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahirwal, A., Gupta, K., & Singh, V., 2019, Effect of irregular plan on seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete buildings, AIP Conference Proceedings, pp. 2158.
Cornelis, R., Bunganaen, W., & Tay, B. H. U., 2014, Analisis Perbandingan Gaya Geser Tingkat, Gaya Geser Tingkat Akibat Beban Gempa Berdasarkan Peraturan Gempa SNI 1726-2002 dan SNI 1726-2012, III(2), hal. 205–216.
Efrida, R., 2018, Pengaruh Setback Pada Bangunan Dengan Soft Story Terhadap Kinerja Struktur Akibat Beban Gempa, Educational Building, 4(1), hal. 62–69.
Mamesah, Y. I., Manalip, H., & Wallah, S., 2019, Pengaruh Dinding Pada Lantai Dasar Terhadap Displacement Pada Bangunan Set-Back Dan Non Set-Back, Jurnal Sipil Statik, 7(8), hal. 1007–1014.
Nurfitri, J. W., Sutiono, W., Saragih, E. S. M., & Purwantoro, A. D. S. (2022). Studi Analisis Pengaruh Set-Back Pada Bangunan Bertingkat Akibat Gempa. 01, hal. 1–6.
Pangestu, K. D., Cornelis, R., & Hangge, E. E., 2021, Analisis Kinerja Struktur Pada Model Bangunan Setback Menggunakan Metode Time History Analysis, JURNAL FORUM TEKNIK SIPIL (J-ForTekS), 1(2), hal. 1–12.
Ratnasari, A. F., & Pawirodikromo, W., 2018, Pengaruh Kandungan Frekuensi Gempa Terhadap Simpangan dan Drift Ratio 2 Arah Struktur Bangunan Set-Back Bertingkat Banyak. ResearchGate.
Rumimper, B. A. E., Wallah, S. E., Windah, R. S., & Dapas, S. O., 2013, Perhitungan inter story drift pada bangunan tanpa setback dan dengan setback akibat gempa, Jurnal Sipil Statik.
Siswanto, A. B., & Salim, M. A., 2018, Kriteria Dasar Perencanaan Struktur Bangunan Tahan Gempa, Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 11(July), hal. 59–72.
SNI 03-1726-2019, Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Nongedung, Badan Standardisasi Nasional. Jakarta.
SNI 03-1727-2020, Tata Cara Perencanaan Pembebanan Untuk Rumah dan Gedung, Badan Standardisasi Nasional. Jakarta.
SNI 03-2847-2019, Tata Cara Perhitungan Beton Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung, Badan Standardisasi Nasional. Jakarta.
Tjitradi, D., & Eliatun, 2019, Potensi Gempa Terhadap Struktur Bangunan Panggung di Lahan Basah Kalimantan Selatan, Buletin Profesi Insinyur.
Tumbal, T. E. F., Windah, R. S., & Mondoringin, M. R. I. A. J. (2019). Pengaruh Set-Back Pada Tingkat Teratas. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 7(6), hal. 615–626.
Widyastuti, H., & Noviantoro, F., 2006, Respon Dinamik Struktur Setback Secara Vertikal, Universitas Islam Indonesia.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/infotek.v0i0.18641
DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/infotek.v0i0.18641.g9827
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 61 timesPDF - 207 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 INFO-TEKNIK
This work is licensed under a�Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.�
Indexed By:
Citation :
SINTA 6 mulai Vol. 19 No. 2 2018 (SK NO. 164/E/KPT/2021)GOOGLE SCHOLAR : Sitasi = 78, H-index = 5, i10-index = 2
IPI :� Artikel = 100
IOS 3969 : Artikel = 239
�