Dynamic System of Flood Disaster Management in Makassar City Using the Analysis AHP Method

Wahyu Dzunaid Syawal; Uca Sideng; Amal Arfan

doi:10.20527/jpg.v12i1.21739

Dynamic System of Flood Disaster Management in Makassar City Using the Analysis AHP Method

Wahyu Dzunaid Syawal, Uca Sideng, Amal Arfan

Abstract

Flooding is one of the problems frequently faced by the people of Makassar City. This natural disaster is highly destructive and detrimental, affecting infrastructure, livelihoods, and the social conditions of the community. This study employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to evaluate the criteria influencing flood management, focusing on population size and the role of stakeholders. Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to experts from various agencies, including the Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency (BMKG) Region 4 Makassar, the Environmental Agency of Makassar City, the Public Works Agency of Makassar City, the Jeneberang River Basin Office, and the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) of Makassar City.The results of the study indicate that AHP data processing yields a comparison matrix value for flood disaster risk management and mitigation. The most dominant influencing criterion is the role of stakeholders, accounting for 54%, followed by population size at 27%, land development rate at 13%, and environmental quality at 6%. The analysis of the management dynamics model shows that the risk and impact of flooding have an interrelated relationship among the four categories. The role of stakeholders has the greatest contribution in influencing the categories of population size, land development rate, and environmental quality.

Keywords

Flood; AHP; Dynamic System

Full Text:

PDF

References

Achmad Yanu, A., & colleagues. (2015). Evaluation of spatial patterns based on flood vulnerability in Pidie Regency. Journal of Local Planning, 3, 130-147.

Ahadi, G. D., & Ulfah, S. (2024). Descriptive statistical analysis of flood disaster mitigation based on village potential data 2021. LaGeografia, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.35580/lageografia.v22i3.64637

Allafta, H., & Opp, C. (2021). GIS-based multicriteria analysis for flood-prone area mapping in the Shatt Al-Arab basin, Iraq-Iran. Natural Hazards and Geomatika, 12(1), 2087–2116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1955755

Bui, D. T., Ngo, P. T. T., Pham, T. D., Jaafari, A., Minh, N. Q., Hoa, P. V., & Samui, P. (2019). A new hybrid approach based on swarm intelligence optimization extreme learning machine for flash flood vulnerability mapping. Catena, 179, 184–196.

Chen, H., Ito, Y., Sawamukai, M., & Tokunaga, T. (2020). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis for the Chiba Prefecture plain, Japan. Natural Hazards, 78(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1699-0

Eimba, A. B. (2017). Physical characteristics of flood vulnerability using geospatial methods in Okazaki City, Aichi Prefecture, Japan. Journal of Urban Science, 1(7), Article 7

Farlow, et al. 2002. Differential Equations and Linear Algebra. International Edition. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

Green, C. H., Parker, D. J. & Tunstall, S. M. (2000) Assessment of Flood Control and Management Options. Thematic Review IV.4 prepared as an input to the World Commission on Dams, CapeTown, http://www.dams.org

Heru Setiawan Purnawali, H., & colleagues. (2017). Flood vulnerability using remote sensing analysis: Case study of Sidoarjo Regency. Journal of Regional Conferences on Civil Engineering (RCCE), 568-577.

Ibrahim, K., Emaliyawati, E., & Yani, D. I. (2020). Training and simulation of disaster management for the community. Media Karya Kesehatan, 3(1), 27–38.

Kundzewicz, Z. W., Kanae, S., Seneviratne, S. I., Handmer, J., Nicholls, N., Peduzzi, P., Mechler, R., Bouwer, L. M., Arnell, N., Mach, K., Muir-Wood, R., Brakenridge, G. R., Kron, W., Benito, G., Honda, Y., Takahashi, K., & Sherstyukov, B. (2014). Flood risk and climate change: Global and regional perspectives. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.857411Etiopia.

Mojaddadi, H., Pradhan, B., Nampak, H., Ahmad, N., & Ghazali, A. H. bin. (2017). Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multisensor remote-sensing data and GIS. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8(3), 212-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113

Rahmandani, M., & Yanuar, F. (2023). The application of system dynamics in flood management: A case study of the Ciliwung River basin, Indonesia. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 28(4), 535-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-023-09876-x

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.

Sarmah, T., & Das, S. (2018). Urban flood mitigation planning in Guwahati: A case study of the Bharalu basin. Journal of Environmental Management, 206, 1155–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.079

Sterman, J. D. (2020). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Sugianto, S., Deli, A., Miswar, E., Rusdi, M., & Irham, M. (2022). The influence of changes in land use and land cover on flooding in the Teunom watershed, Aceh Jaya. Land, 11(8),

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jpg.v12i1.21739