Technology-Enhanced Learning in Geography Education: A Systematic Review of Geospatial Tools and Outcomes

Yeyen Sri Nuraeni; Epon Ningrum; Bagja Waluya

doi:10.20527/jpg.v13i2.26079

Technology-Enhanced Learning in Geography Education: A Systematic Review of Geospatial Tools and Outcomes

Yeyen Sri Nuraeni, Epon Ningrum, Bagja Waluya

Abstract

Geography education increasingly incorporates digital technologies; however, evidence regarding their development, implementation, and impacts on student learning remains fragmented. This study synthesizes empirical research on technology-enhanced learning in geography education. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA protocol was conducted using studies retrieved from Scopus and Google Scholar. The review included peer-reviewed journal articles published in English between 2015 and 2025 that examined technology-enhanced learning in geography education and reported empirical evidence on student learning outcome. Study quality was assessed using predefined methodological criteria. From 181 identified records, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed through descriptive and thematic synthesis. The findings indicate three major trends. First, geography learning technologies have evolved from content digitization toward more interactive and contextual learning environments. Second, technology-enhanced learning promotes active participation and student engagement across various instructional models. Third, technology integration improves spatial thinking, ecological literacy, critical thinking, and learning motivation, particularly when supported by pedagogically sound instructional design. The review demonstrates that learning effectiveness depends not only on technology itself but also on the alignment between pedagogical design, purposeful technology integration, and institutional support. These findings provide implications for educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers in designing innovative and effective geography learning environments.

Keywords

Technology-Enhanced Learning; Geography Education; Geospatial Tools; Implementation Strategies; Learning Outcomes

References

Adnyana, I. G. A. P., & Maitri, N. A. U. (2014). Pelestarian Lingkungan Hidup Berbasis Kearifan Lokal (Local Wisdom) di Desa Tenganan Kecamatan Manggis Kabupaten Karangasem. Media Komunikasi Geografi, 15(2).)

Arrowsmith, C., Counihan, A., & McGreevy, D. (2005). Development of a multi-scaled virtual field trip for the teaching and learning of geospatial science. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 1(3), 42–56.

Bednarz, S. W., Acheson, G., & Bednarz, R. S. (2006). Maps and map learning in social studies. Social Education, 70(7), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.2307/42843965

Bintarto, R. (1968). Pengantar geografi sosial. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Blankman, M., van der Schee, J., Volman, M., & Boogaard, M. (2017). Geographical awareness of primary school teacher students in the Netherlands. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(4), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2016.1228583

Bos, D., Miller, S., & Bull, E. (2022). Using virtual reality (VR) for teaching and learning in geography: fieldwork, analytical skills, and employability. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 46(3), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.1901867

Bunting, P., & Fearnley, C. (2011). Understanding the potential new roles for mobile computer technologies for teaching Geography fieldwork: Using GIS and social networking to enhance learning opportunities. Higher Education Academy Learning & Teaching Enhancement Fund, Wales

Carow, S., Schmitz, P., & Pretorius, R. (2023). Spatial perspectives on student profiling to inform open distance e-learning (ODeL) in various geographical contexts: a case study from the Global South. Discover Sustainability, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-023-00143-9

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (n.d.). Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect.

Friess, D. A., Oliver, G. J. H., Quak, M. S. Y., & Lau, A. Y. A. (2016). Incorporating “virtual” and “real world” field trips into introductory geography modules. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(4), 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1174818

Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Han, I. (2021). Immersive virtual field trips and elementary students' perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12946

Higgins, N. C., & LaPointe, M. R. (2012). An individual differences measure of attributions that affect achievement behavior: Factor structure and predictive validity of the academic attributional style questionnaire. Sage Open, 2(4), 2158244012470110.

Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., et al. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Hurrell, E. R., Hutchinson, S. M., Batty, L. C., Bunting, M. J., & Parsons, D. R. (2025). The role of virtual field trips in Geography higher education: A perspective paper. Area. Advance online publication.

Isa, N. K. M., Leh, F. C., Isa, N. J. M., Yunos, M. Y. M., Othman, S., & Ibrahim, M. H. (2023). A Flipped Learning Experience in Geography: A Qualitative Study using Focus Group Discussion. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 31(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.31.1.119131

Iwan Setiawan, Arrasyid, R., Mulyadi, A., & Jupri, J. (2025). Effectiveness of using geographic information systems (GIS) in teaching geography in Indonesian schools. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovation in Education and Social Science (pp. 3–15). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-360-3_3

Jenkins, L. (2019). Using blended learning to facilitate large room seminar provision in cultural geography modules. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(2), 244–254.

Jenkins, L. (2019). Using blended learning to facilitate large room seminar provision in cultural geography modules. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(2), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1600139

Kenna, T. (2016). Teaching and learning global urban geography using learner-centred approaches. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1241984

Kerski, J. J. (2008). The role of GIS in digital earth education. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1(4), 326–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538940802420879

Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is “enhanced” and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404

Kohe, G. Z., & Wise, D. (2023). Spatialising sport management education: A conceptual inquiry. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 32, 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2022.100425

Kostopoulos, G., Kotsiantis, S., & Verykios, V. S. (2017). A prognosis of junior high school students’ performance based on active learning methods. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10512 LNAI, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67615-9_6

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

Li, Y., Krause, S., McLendon, A., & Jo, I. (2023). Teaching a geography field methods course amid the COVID-19 pandemic: reflections and lessons learned. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 47(2), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2022.2041571

Lobja, E. U., O’Neill, A., Pangalila, T., Karwur, H., & Burdam, Y. (2019). The reconstruction of cultural values and local wisdom. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 335, 408–413. https://doi.org/10.2991/icss-19.2019.72

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. In BMJ (Online) (Vol. 339, Number 7716, pp. 332–336). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

Newington, L., Wells, M., Adonis, A., Bolton, L., Saghdaoui, L. B., Coffey, M., ... & Alexander, C. M. (2021). A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine. BMC Health Services Research, 21, 1.

Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge growth in teaching with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.3.c

Nurhakim, I., Suherdiyanto, & Kusnoto, Y. (2020). The strengthening of ecology literacy in eleventh grade senior high school students through development of Group Investigation (GI) module in geographic lessons of SMA Negeri 3 Sungai Kakap, Kubu Raya Regency. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 485(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/485/1/012108

Ramadhan, S., Mardapi, D., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Utomo, H. B. (2018). Higher-order thinking skills instrument. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.2.387.

Gendenjamts, S. (2023). Measuring higher-order thinking Skills in science among primary school students using item response theory. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(12).)

Robson, J., Cooke, J., Wheeler, P., Maseyk, K., & Collins, T. (2017, April 25–26). Evaluating remote access to fieldwork with interactive fieldcasts for distance learning students. The 6th eSTEeM Annual Conference, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1985). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being Self-Determination Theory. Ryan.

Šašinka, Č., Stachoň, Z., Sedlák, M., Chmelík, J., Herman, L., Kubíček, P., ... & Juřík, V. (2019). Collaborative immersive virtual environments for education in geography. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(1), 3.)

Scacchetti, M., & Chicchi, S. (2019). Geosciences at school. Rendiconti Online della Società Geologica Italiana, 49, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.3301/ROL.2019.50

Schultz, R. B., & DeMers, M. N. (2020). Transitioning from emergency remote learning to deep online learning experiences in geography education. Journal of Geography, 119(5), 142-146.

Smith, S. (2022). Non-digital approaches to geographical skills. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 46(3), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.1931828

Stokes, A., Collins, T., Maskall, J., Lea, J., Lunt, P., & Davies, S. (2012). Enabling Remote Access to Fieldwork: Gaining Insight into the Pedagogic Effectiveness of “Direct” and “Remote” Field Activities. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2011.619004

Wijayanto, B., Nofrion, N., Mariya, S., Sumarmi, S., Utomo, D. H., & Handoyo, B. (2025). Geospatial Technology E-Module Development for Strengthening TPACK Competency in Geomorphology Study. TEM Journal, 14(4), 3005–3024. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM144-12

Wolf, M., Wehking, F., Montag, M., & Söbke, H. (2021). 360°-based virtual field trips to waterworks in higher education. Computers, 10(9), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10090118

Wood, J. (2019). Utilizing technology-enhanced learning in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(3), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1614590

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jpg.v13i2.26079