Development of performance evaluation instruments for faculty of national sports sciences lecturers

Masrun Masrun, Umar Umar, Khairuddin Khairuddin

Abstract


Assessing the performance of lecturers is a vital tool to ensure optimal education and learning aligned with established quality standards. However, there is currently no universally accepted tool for evaluating the performance of Faculty of Sport Science (FIK) lecturers in Indonesia. This research aims to create and standardize a performance evaluation instrument for FIK lecturers, focusing on Professional, Social, and Personal aspects. Employing a Research and Development (R&D) design with a procedural model, the standardization process involves several key steps. The study focuses on UNP FIK lecturers as test subjects. The standardization process encompasses compiling a framework, expert testing, a limited trial involving 30 samples, and a broader test with 82 samples. Practicality and effectiveness tests are also conducted. Data analysis, performed using the IBM SPSS program with a significance level of p < 0.05, supports the formation of a standardized instrument capable of nationally evaluating the performance of FIK lecturers.

Keywords


evaluation instrument; lecturer performance; sport science

Full Text:

PDF Similarity Check

References


Arthur, L. (2009). From Performativity to Professionalism: Lecturers’ Responses to Student Feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903050228

Aziz, I., Okilanda, A., Permadi, A. A., Tjahyanto, T., Prabowo, T. A., Rozi, M. F., Suganda, M. A., & Suryadi, D. (2023a). Correlational Study: Sports Students’ Special Test Results and Basic Athletic Training Learning Outcomes. Retos, 49, 519–524. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v49.98820

Aziz, I., Okilanda, A., Rozi, M. F., Suganda, M. A., & Suryadi, D. (2023b). Results of Special Tests on Sports Students: Does It Have a Relationship with Learning Outcomes of Basic Athletic Practice? International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 11(3), 676–682. https://doi.org/0.13189/saj.2023.110322

Bakri, F., & Budi, S. (2015). Analisis Hasil Uji Kompetensi Guru Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika. 1(1), 91-96 https://doi.org/10.21009/1.01113

Bangun, S. Y., Sunarno, A., Damanik, S. A., Ilham, Z., & Suganda, M. A. (2023). Modification of Rhythmic Activity Teaching Materials: Study of Development Based on KKNI Curriculum. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(6), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i6.5968

Corcoran, R., & Tormey, R. (2010). Teacher Education, Emotional Competencies and Development Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2(2), 2448-2457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.352

Mahmud, H. (2018). Pelaksanaan Model Pengembangan Kinerja Guru pada SMA Negeri di Kota Palopo. Kelola: Journal of Islamic Education Management, 1(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.24256/kelola.v1i1.426

Mashud, M., Tangkudung, J., & Widiastuti, W. (2018). Swimming Lesson Based on Interactive Multimedia. International Journal of Sports Science, 8(3), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.sports.20180803.04

Mashud, M., Warni, H., Arifin, S., Ferry, M., Pebriyandi, P., & Kristiyandaru, A. (2021). The Application of Discord as an Effort to Increase Students’ Wellbeing in Physical Education Learning during the COVID-19 Emergency. Journal Sport Area, 6(3), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2021.vol6(3).6612

Missaghi-Wedefalk, M., Lindh, M., Schön-Ohlsson, C., & Willén, C. (2012). Further Methodological Development of the Test Instrument for Profile of Physical Ability (TIPPA) Designed for Patients with Long-Term Musculoskeletal Pain. Advances in Physiotherapy, 14(3). 97-106 https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2012.694907

Nygaard, C., & Belluigi, D. Z. (2011). A Proposed Methodology for Contextualised Evaluation in Higher Education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(6), 657-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003650037

Portelli, J. P., Solomon, R. P., Barrett, S., & Mujawamariya, D. (2005). Standardized Teacher Testing Fails Excellence and Validity Tests. Teaching Education, 16(4), 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210500345482

Priatna, W., & Purnomo, R. (2020). Implementasi Fuzzy Inference System Metode Sugeno pada Aplikasi Penilaian Kinerja Dosen. Jurnal Techno.Com, 19(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.33633/tc.v19i3.3638

Ramli, R., & Jalinus, N. (2013). Evaluasi Kinerja Guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Sumatera Barat Pascasertifikasi. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v17i1.1362

Retnowati, T. H., Mardapi, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Suranto, S. (2017). Model Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen: Pengembangan Instrumen untuk Mengevaluasi Kinerja Dosen. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(2), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i2.16626

Richey, Rita C. & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and Development Research: Method, Strategies, and Issues, Manwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (Research and Development). Alfabeta.

Sumaryanta, Mardapi, D., Sugiman, & Herawan, T. (2018). Assessing Teacher Competence and Its Follow-up to Support Professional Development Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 106-123. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0007

Vogt, F., & Rogalla, M. (2009). Developing Adaptive Teaching Competency Through Coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1051-1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.002

Widaningrum, I. (2016). Sistem Informasi Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen Aspek Kompetensi dan Tridarma di Lingkungan Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo. Multitek Indonesia, 6(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.24269/mtkind.v6i1.121

Wulandari, A., Makhtuna, W., & Mashud. (2023). Dasar Kemampuan Mengajar: Analisis Deskriptif pada Mahasiswa PGSD sebagai Bahan Tindak Lanjut Perkuliahan. Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.33369/dikdas.v6i1.26860

Yusrizal, Y. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. PARAMETER: Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 29(1), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.21009/parameter.291.10




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/multilateral.v23i1.17705

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 330 times
PDF - 259 times Similarity Check - 76 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Multilateral : Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 

 

 


Tools:


Indexed by:

 

Creative Commons License
Multilateral : Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

web
statistics View My Stats