Evaluasi Penyusunan Profil Lulusan Program Studi Kefarmasian Berbasis Locus dan Body of Knowledge

Azis Saifudin

doi:10.20527/jps.v11i1.17599

Evaluasi Penyusunan Profil Lulusan Program Studi Kefarmasian Berbasis Locus dan Body of Knowledge

Azis Saifudin

Abstract

Program studi farmasi baik sarjana dan diploma sudah berdiri ratusan program studi. Di sisi lain, jumlah program profesi apoteker juga makin meningkat saat ini. Profil lulusan diperlukan sebagai dasar penyusunan kurikulum masih menjadi problem di banyak institusi pendidikan farmasi, terutama pada saat menghadapi akreditasi. Rumusan profil lulusan yang dijumpai di banyak program studi disusun berdasarkan acuan yang belum merujuk pada prioritas keilmuan (body of knowledge) dan wadah keilmuan (locus of knowledge). Studi ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis ketepatan penyusunan profil lulusan dari 4 sampel program studi sarjana farmasi menurut area praktek kefarmasian, regulasi dan kerangka kualifikasi. Perumusan profil lulusan yang koheren dengan tuntutan kompetensi praktek akan menjadi pengarah lebih lanjut pada capaian pembelajaran lulusan (CPL) dan diturunkan menjadi kurikulum mata kuliah yang logis dan koheren. Elaborasi lebih lanjut dilakukan berdasarkan pengalaman mendampingi banyak program studi dalam meninjau dan menyusun kurikulum yang ditujukkan untuk meningkatkan ketepatan penyusunan profil lulusan dan mencegah potensi kebuntuan pola keruntutan produk kurikulum dari profil lulusan yang disebabkan karena pernyatan-pernyataan rumusan yang kurang mengacu pada locus dan body of knowledge dan skill dari praktek kefarmasian. Berdasarkan analisa temuan sampel rumusan dari beberapa program studi terpilih dapat disimpulkan bahwa profil lulusan yang disusun masih banyak bersifat umum dan belum mencerminkan kompetensi khusus rumpun keilmuan. Di sisi lain, banyak profil lulusan yang belum mengandung unsur penciri institusi.

Kata Kunci: Body of Knowledge, Kurikulum, Profil Lulusan, Farmasi, Program Studi

Hundreds of pharmacy study programs, both undergraduate and diploma, have been established. On the other hand, the number of professional pharmacist programs is also increasing at this time. The graduate profile required as a basis for curriculum preparation is still a fundamental issue in many pharmaceutical education institutions, especially when facing accreditation. The formulation of graduate profiles found in many study programs is prepared based on references that do not refer to scientific priorities (body of knowledge) and scientific container (locus of knowledge). This study was conducted to analyze the accuracy of preparing graduate profiles from 4 samples of undergraduate pharmacy study programs according to pharmaceutical practice areas, regulations and qualification frameworks. The formulation of a graduate profile that is coherent with the demands of practical competency will be a further guide to graduate learning outcomes (CPL) and be reduced to a logical and coherent course curriculum. Further elaboration was carried out based on the experience of assisting many study programs in reviewing and compiling curricula aimed at increasing the accuracy of preparing graduate profiles and preventing potential incoherence in the pattern of curriculum product sequence from graduate profiles caused by formulated statements that do not refer to the locus and body of knowledge. and skills from pharmacy practice. Based on the analysis of the findings of selected study programs, it can be concluded that the graduate profiles prepared are still largely general in nature and do not reflect the specific competencies of scientific groups. On the other hand, many graduate profiles do not contain institutional characteristics.

Keywords

Body of Knowledge, Curriculum, Graduate Profile, Pharmacy, Study Program

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aisyah, S., (2019). Guide Book-Outcomes Based Education Constructive Alignment, ITS, Surabaya.

Burk-Rafel, J., Marin, M., Triola, M., Fancher, T., Ko, M., Mejicano, G., & Richardson, J. (2021). The AMA graduate profile: tracking medical school graduates into practice. Academic Medicine, 96(11S), S178-S179. https://org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004315

Gargalicano, C. A. G., De Oca, P. R., Hernane Jr, S. G., Arosa, A. A. M., Radadon, S. T. A., & Gargalicano, F. G. (2023). Factors that influence career choice of graduating pharmacy students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(2), 663-670. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.04.32

Dhirathiti C. (2020). Guide to AUN-QA Assessment at Programme Level Version 4.0, ASEAN University Network, Bangkok, Thailand.

Junaidi A., Wulandari D., Arifin S., Soetanto H., Kusumawardani S. S., Wastutiningsih S. P., Utama M. S., Cahyono E., Hertono G. F., Syam N.M., Jumaipa W.Y., Putra P. H., Wijayanti C., & Jobih. (2020). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi, Belmawa Dikti, Jakarta.

Kaliannan, M., & Chandran, S. D. (2012). Empowering students through outcome-based education (OBE). Research in Education, 87(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.87.1.4

Kemendikbud RI. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan nomor 53 tahun 2023 tentang penjaminan mutu pendidikan tinggi, Kemendikbud, Jakarta.

Kemenkumham. (2009). Peraturan Pemerintah nomor 51 tentang pekerjaan kefarmasian, 2009, Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta.

Kemenkumham. (2023). Undang-undang Kesehatan Nomor 17 tahun 2023, Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta

Kemenristekdikti RI. (2020). Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi nomor 3 tahun 2020, Jakarta

Kremin, Y., Lesyk, L., Lesyk, R., Levytska, O., and Hromovyk, B. (2023). Detailing the Ten Main Professional Roles of a Pharmacist to Provide the Scope of Professional Functions. Scientia Pharmaceutica, 91(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm91010005

Lamptkes a. (2019). Buku IIIA Pandungan Panduan Pengisian Dokumen Kinerja Akreditasi Program Studi Sarjana Farmasi, Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Perguruan Tinggi Kesehatan Kesehatan, Jakarta.

Lamptkes b. (2019). Buku IIIB Panduan Penyusunan Laporan Evaluasi Diri Akreditasi Program Studi Sarjana Farmasi, Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Perguruan Tinggi Kesehatan Kesehatan, Jakarta.

Lamptkes c. (2019). Buku IIIA Pandungan Panduan Pengisian Dokumen Kinerja Akreditasi Program Studi Profesi Apoteker, Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Perguruan Tinggi Kesehatan Kesehatan, Jakarta.

Lamptkes d. (2019). Buku IIIB Panduan Penyusunan Laporan Evaluasi Diri Akreditasi Program Studi Profesi Apoteker, Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Perguruan Tinggi Kesehatan Kesehatan, Jakarta.

Narsa IM. (2023). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Perguruan Tinggi 2023, Direktorat Inovasi dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya

Nurwardani P., Tutupoho R. R., Mulyono E., Nugroho S. W., Endrotomo, Arifin S., Djajanto L., Soetanto H., Mursid S. P., Sugiharto L., Wastutiningsih S. P., Utama M. S., Arifin P., Ghufron A., Evawany., & Priyautama F. (2016). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi, Belmawa Dikti, Jakarta.

Rao, N. J. (2020). Outcome-based education: An outline. Higher Education for the Future, 7(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631119886418

Sakti, H., Kaloeti, D. V. S., & Indrawati, N. D. (2023, October). Differences in Academic Self-Efficacy Levels in Terms of the Priority Choices of Graduate Profiles on College Students. In Proceedings of International Conference on Psychological Studies (ICPsyche) (Vol. 4, pp. 63-71). https://doi.org/10.58959/icpsyche.v4i1.24

Sam, A. T., & Parasuraman, S. (2015). The Nine-Star Pharmacist: An Overview. Journal of Young pharmacists, 7(4), 281-284. https://doi.org/ 10.5530/jyp.2015.4.1

Suárez-Brito, P., Vázquez-Parra, J. C., López-Caudana, E. O., & Buenestado-Fernandez, M. (2024). Examining the level of perceived achievement of complex thinking competency in health Sciences students and its relevance to the graduate profile. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 6, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100314

Thamby S. A., & Subramani P. (2014). Seven-Star Pharmacist Concept of WHO. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 6(2), 1-3. https://doi.org/ 10.5530/jyp.2014.2.1

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jps.v11i1.17599