Assistance in Making Dynamic Electricity KITs Based on Scientific Argumentation Skills for Physics Teachers in Sidoarjo Senior High School

Utama Alan Deta; Muhammad Nurul Fahmi; Alfi Nurlailiyah; Ria Rusmawati; Mita Anggaryani; Budi Jatmiko

doi:10.20527/btjpm.v5i2.6919

Assistance in Making Dynamic Electricity KITs Based on Scientific Argumentation Skills for Physics Teachers in Sidoarjo Senior High School

Utama Alan Deta, Muhammad Nurul Fahmi, Alfi Nurlailiyah, Ria Rusmawati, Mita Anggaryani, Budi Jatmiko

Abstract

Physics learning cannot be separated from studying abstract concepts and practical activities to help students understand concepts in real terms. In the learning process, practical tools are needed to made easily and used in learning. The limited equipment in the laboratory is one of the obstacles to the lack of optimal learning activities, especially in practical activities. Therefore, teachers are required to be more creative and innovative in utilizing the tools around them so they can be used as practical tools. Dynamic electricity is also seen as an abstract concept requiring a practicum so that students can understand the concept real and meaningfully. Then, the other obstacle is scientific argumentation skills that still need to be better trained or not contained in the learning materials. It makes students' skills in scientific argumentation still lacking. The solution is: Synergize with the Physics Senior High School Teachers in Sidoarjo. They are trained through training to make physics practicum tools. Thus, the training participants can make these practical tools, can arrange student worksheets according to these tools and based on scientific argumentation skills. They can apply them in learning at their school. The result of this training is that the response of the Physics Senior high school teachers to the materials and demonstrations is very enthusiastic and interesting. This is evidenced by the average response questionnaire results of 3.44 with the maximum value of the questionnaire being 4. The maximum value obtained based on the response questionnaire is 3.66 and the lowest is 3.28.

Keywords

physics practicum tools, dynamic electricity, Physics Senior High School Teacher

Full Text:

Untitled

References

Alderman, G. H. (1992). The Lecture Method versus the Question-and-Answer Method. The School Review, 30(3), 205–209. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1078543

Anwar, B. (2018). Kompetensi Pedagogik sebagai Agen Pembelajaran. Shaut Al Arabiyyah, 6(2), 114–125. Doi: 10.24252/saa.v6i2.7129

Chi, M. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105. Doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x

Dibarbora, C. (2021). Computational models and experimental validation at the physics teacher training college using scilab and arduino™. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882, 012139. Doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012139

Dorgu, W. E. (2015). Different Teaching Methods: A Panacea for Effective Curriculum Implementation in the Classroom. International Journal of Secondary Education, 3(6-1), 77–87. Doi: 10.11648/J.IJSEDU.S.2015030601.13

Eliza, D., Husna, A., Utami, N., and Putri, Y. D. (2022). Studi Deskriptif Profesionalisme Guru Paud Berdasarkan Prinsip-Prinsip Profesional Guru Pada Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 2005. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 4663-4671. Doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2837

Fatmawati, F., Hasbi, H., and Nurdin, K. (2020). Dampak Implementasi Manajemen Musyawarah Guru Mata Pelajaran (MGMP) IPS Terhadap Profesionalitas Guru SMP Negeri di Palopo. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 9(3), 369–383. Doi: 10.58230/27454312.53

Gultepe, N. and Kilic, Z. (2015). Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Scientific Process Skills in the Context of Teaching Chemistry. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2015, 10(1), 111-132. Doi: 10.12973/ijese.2015.234a

Harris, D. N. and Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 798–812. Doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009

Hw, S., Subadi, T., Sutama, S., and Khotimah, R. P. (2017). Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru Sekolah Dasar Melalui Lesson Study (Sosialisasi LS bagi Guru SDN 1, 2 Gentan Baki - Sukoharjo).

Warta LPM, 13(1), 55–64.

Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. (2009). Energizing learning: The instructional power of conflict. Educational Researcher, 38(1), 37–51. Doi: 10.3102/0013189X08330540

Papadogiannakis, I. (2019). The Use of Question-and-Answer Method and Process in Anastasius’ Hexaemeron. In J. Verheyden (Ed.), Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses, 3 ed., 95, 397-414.

Resnick, L., Asterhan, C., and Clarke, S. N. (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Silva, C. H., Gómez-Martínez, Y., Ruz López, D., Ugalde, M. S., and Nores, S. T. (2020). Formación de profesores de Física en Chile: realidad y desafíos. Revista Electronica de Investigacion Educativa. 22(e18). 1-18.

Marzuki, M., Sudiarta, I. W., Handayana, I. G. N. Y., Hiden, H., and Qomariyah, N. (2019). Pendampingan Kegiatan Pendalaman Konsep-Konsep Dasar Fisika dan Matematika Bagi Guru-Guru Anggota MGMP. SELAPARANG Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan, 3(1), 134-138. Doi: 10.31764/jpmb.v3i1.1279

Yohamintin, Y., Permana, J., Nurdin, D., Suharjuddin, S., Alkaf, A. H., and Huliatunisa, Y. (2021). Evaluasi Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan Dalam Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesional Pendidik. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 173–184. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uksw.edu/kelola/article/view/5072

Zati, V. D. A. and Anifah, A. (2019). Upaya Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesional Tenaga Pendidik di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Seminar Nasional PGSD Unimed, 2(1), 38–43. Retrieved from: https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/snpu/article/view/161

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/btjpm.v5i2.6919