MODUL KIMIA HIJAU DENGAN MENERAPKAN PROJECT-BASED LEARNING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KARAKTER KREATIF SISWA SMA

Sri Rahayu, Fahmi Fahmi

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan validitas modul kimia hijau yang dikembangkan dengan menerapkan pendekatan project-based learning (PjBL) untuk meningkatkan karakter kreatif siswa SMA. Metode penelitian toto22 yang digunakan adalah penelitian pengembangan dengan desain ADDIE (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation) sampai dengan tahap uji validitas dan kepraktisan. Instrumen pengumpulan data meliputi lembar validasi ahli materi, ahli media, dan ahli pembelajaran, serta respons peserta didik. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik deskriptif kualitatif dan perhitungan persentase untuk menentukan kategori validitas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa modul kimia hijau berbasis PjBL memperoleh skor validitas aspek materi sebesar 87,5% (sangat valid), aspek media sebesar 85% (sangat valid), dan aspek desain pembelajaran sebesar 88% (sangat valid). Uji kepraktisan menunjukkan respons guru sebesar 92% (sangat praktis) dan respons siswa sebesar 90% (sangat praktis). Simpulan dari penelitian ini adalah modul kimia hijau dengan menerapkan project-based learning telah terbukti valid dan praktis digunakan dalam pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan karakter kreatif siswa SMA. Temuan ini memberikan kontribusi penting bagi pengembangan bahan ajar inovatif yang mengintegrasikan isu lingkungan dengan pembelajaran kimia yang bermakna.

Kata kunci: Karakter kreatif, modul kimia hijau, project-based learning, siswa SMA.

 

This study aims to determine the validity of a green chemistry module developed using a project-based learning (PjBL) approach to enhance the creative character of senior high school students. The research employed a development method using the ADDIE model (analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation), limited to the stages of validity and practicality testing. Data were collected through expert validation sheets covering material, media, and instructional design, as well as student response questionnaires. The data were analyzed using descriptive qualitative techniques and percentage calculations to determine validity categories. The results showed that the PjBL-based green chemistry module achieved a validity score of 87.5% (very valid) for the material aspect, 85% (very valid) for the media aspect, and 88% (very valid) for the instructional design aspect. Practicality testing indicated very positive responses, with teacher responses at 92% (very practical) and student responses at 90% (very practical). In conclusion, the green chemistry module implemented through project-based learning has been proven to be valid and practical for use in learning to enhance the creative character of senior high school students. These findings contribute significantly to the development of innovative teaching materials that integrate environmental issues with meaningful chemistry learning.

Keywords: Creative character, green chemistry module, project-based learning, senior high school students.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalda, F., Setiawan, B., & Raharjo, S. (2023). Penerapan model pembelajaran project-based learning terhadap peningkatan kreativitas siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 12(3), 234-247.

Anastas, P. T., & Warner, J. C. (2006). Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Arikunto, S., & Safruddin, S. (2021). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Praktis Bagi Praktisi Pendidikan (3rd ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(2), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905009

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415

Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. David McKay Company.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE Approach (Learning and Instructional Technologies for the 21st Century). Springer Publishing Company.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Collins.

Eilam, B., & Trop, T. (2012). Environmental Education: Conceptual Issues, Research Studies, and Applications. Kineret College Press.

Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: A science inquiry on students' motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20423

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45-51.

Hasnunidah, N., & Pramesty, M. (2019). Implementasi pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan kreativitas dan prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.6.1.2019.12-24

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Ibanez, J. G., Shacham, M., & Gutierrez-Rocha, H. (2016). Undergraduate green chemistry: Drinkable water production by electrochemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(4), 656-662. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00657

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25(34), 1-26.

Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the Standard for Project Based Learning: A Proven Approach to Rigorous Classroom Instruction. ASCD.

Ramirez, M. V., & Ganley, B. (2017). Green chemistry in the classroom: Inquiry-based experiments. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(5), 559-564.

Ruhul, M., & Juaini. (2023). Efektivitas project-based learning dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 7(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.26740/didaktika.v7i1.123

UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. UNESCO Publishing.

Stoeckel, M. (2021). Lab safety in a PjBL chemistry course: Creating a culture of responsibility and inquiry. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2), 380-387. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00859

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. AutoDesk Foundation, 1-45.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. Falmer Press.

Widyastuti, A., & Suwarna, I. P. (2018). Analisis kesulitan belajar kimia pada siswa SMA di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 7(2), 45-58.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/i.v6i1.18808

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Journal of Science Education and Applied Science



IJSEAS has been Indexed by:

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0