Profiling Creative Thinking Skills and Exploring Development Barriers among Physics Education Students: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Study

Hermansyah Hermansyah, Ida Kaniawati, Winny Liliawati

Abstract


In contemporary education, the capacity for creative thinking has emerged as a fundamental skill that equips students to navigate an increasingly complex and interconnected world. Within physics education specifically, fostering such capabilities remains underemphasized, as instructional practices tend to prioritize procedural mastery and conceptual recall over exploratory and generative thinking. This preliminary needs assessment study employed a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design to examine the profile of creative thinking skills and the barriers to their development among physics education students during thermodynamics coursework, a domain in which creative problem-solving is crucial yet remains underexplored. Quantitative data were obtained through a creative thinking test based on Torrance indicators, while qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with students. The results of the study showed that the level of creative thinking of students was still in the medium to low category, with originality (29.17%) and elaboration (35.42%) indicators showing dominant weaknesses. Interviews also revealed that most students felt that they did not get enough space in lectures to explore ideas freely and creatively. These findings indicate a real need to design a physics learning approach that is more conducive to the development of creative thinking skills. The implications of this study highlight the need for project-based pedagogical innovation, open-ended problem solving, and authentic assessments that can stimulate students’ creative thinking more systematically

Keywords


Creative thinking skills profile; Development barriers; Physics education students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amiruddin, Baharuddin, F. R., Takbir, & Setialaksana, W. (2023). May student-centered principles affect active learning and its counterpart? An empirical study of Indonesian curriculum implementation. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231214375

Anderman, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Gray, D. L. L. (2012). The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty-first century: exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners. Studies in Science Education, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.655038

Ansari, J. A. N., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00118-7

Atthachakara, S. (2021). Developing practical skills through blended learning model using creativity-based learning activites that enhances creative thinking for education students majoring in social studies at mahasarakham university. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n6p126

Batlolona, J. R., Diantoro, M., Wartono, & Latifah, E. (2019). Creative thinking skills students in physics on solid material elasticity. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10265a

Borthwick, K., & Gallagher-Brett, A. (2014). “Inspiration, ideas, encouragement”: teacher development and improved use of technology in language teaching through open educational practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818560

Bramastia, B., & Rahayu, S. (2023). Study of science learning based on scientific literacy in improving critical thinking: A scoping review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.5667

Burnard, P., Colucci-Gray, L., & Sinha, P. (2021). Transdisciplinarity: letting arts and science teach together. Curriculum Perspectives, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-020-00128-y

Burroughs-Lange, S. G. (1996). University lecturers’ concept of their role. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436960150103

Colomer, J., Serra, T., Cañabate, D., & Bubnys, R. (2020). Reflective learning in higher education: Active methodologies for transformative practices. In Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093827

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. In Organizational Research Methods, 12(4).

Drapeau, P. (2014). Sparking student creativity: Practical ways to promote innovative thinking and problem solving. In ASCD.

EL-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., Alzaghibi, M., & Alhammad, K. (2017).

Context of STEM integration in schools: Views from in-service science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01235A

Eren, C. D., & Akinoglu, O. (2012). The effects of problem based

learning on scientific creative thinking skills in science education. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, (Special Issue), 976–980. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314848400

Etkina, E., Karelina, A., Ruibal-Villasenor, M., Rosengrant, D., Jordan, R., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2010). Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452876

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2011). A rich seam how new pedagogies find deep learning. In Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies (Vol. 15, Number January).

Giri, A. K. (2002). The calling of a creative transdisciplinarity. Futures, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00038-6

Jennifer, L. D., & José, P. M. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 10.

Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers and Education, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022

Kapon, S., Laherto, A., & Levrini, O. (2018). Disciplinary authenticity and personal relevance in school science. Science Education, 102(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21458

Kim How, R. P. T., Zulnaidi, H., & Rahim, S. S. A. (2022). HOTS in quadratic equations: Teaching style preferences and challenges faced by malaysian teachers. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/SCIMATH/11382

Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-in-action with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300424

Levin, H. (1984). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/3323945

McLoughlin, C. (2001). Inclusivity and alignment: Principles of pedagogy, task and assessment design for effective cross-cultural online learning. Distance Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220102

Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347

Norton, L., Norton, B., & Shannon, L. (2013). Revitalising assessment design: What is holding new lecturers back? Higher Education, 66(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9601-9

Ramankulov, S. Z., Dosymov, E., Mintassova, A. S., & Pattayev, A. M. (2019). Assessment of student creativity in teaching physics in a foreign language. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2019.3.587

Riduwan, R. (2013). Dasar - dasar statistik. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Sigala, M., & Chalkiti, K. (2015). Knowledge management, social media and employee creativity. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.11.003

Simeon, M. I., Samsudin, M. A., & Yakob, N. (2022). Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09601-1

Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916216

Slavinec, M., Aberšek, B., Gačević, D., & Flogie, A. (2019). Monodisciplinarity in science versus transdisciplinarity in stem education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.435

Subramaniam, R. C., Morphew, J. W., Rebello, C. M., & Rebello, N. S. (2025). Presenting a STEM ways of thinking framework for engineering design-based physics problems. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(010122).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010122

Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2018). Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1).

https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329

van Leeuwe, N. I., & van Broekhoven, K. (2025). Positive risk-taking and creativity in grade 6 children: The moderating role of psychological safety. Creativity, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2025-0009

Varlık, S. (2025). Research literacy, socio-scientific reasoning, and problem-solving skills in science teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.377

Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2016). Fostering scientific literacy and critical thinking in elementary science education. international Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2

Wahbeh, D. G., Najjar, E. A., Sartawi, A. F., Abuzant, M., & Daher, W. (2021). The role of project-based language learning in developing students’ life skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126518

Yang, H., Zhu, H., Luo, W., & Peng, W. (2023). Design and practice of innovative practice workshop for new nurses based on creativity component theory and outcome based education(OBE) concept. BMC Medical Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04684-5




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jmscedu.v6i1.18272

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License

Journal Of Mathematics Science and Computer Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.