ANTARA HAMBA JAJAHAN ATAU WARGA NEGARA: PRIBUMI DALAM RUANG KEWARGANEGARAAN LOKAL 1848-1940

Ahmad Fahmil Aziz

Abstract


Untill 1940, the citizenship system in the Dutch East Indies had undergone several changes. This culminated in the official enactment of the Algemene Bepalingen van wetgeving voor Indonesie, which was reinforced by Article 109 of the Regeringsreglement and then Article 163 of the Indische Staatsregeling. These regulations divided the population of the Dutch East Indies into three groups: 1) Europeans, 2) Vreemde Oosterlingen, and 3) Inlanders. This policy creates social segregation in the citizen hierarchy. The citizenship system became exclusive, placing Europeans as first-class citizens, while Indigenous people were placed as lower-class citizens. This article explains the status of Indigenous people in the colonial citizenship system and practices from 1848 to 1940. The purpose of this research is to analyze the citizenship status of Indigenous people through civil registration as the primary instrument of legitimacy as citizens. This research uses historical research methods that include topic selection, heuristics, source criticism, interpretation, and historiography. The findings show, first, that the colonial citizenship system created superiority and inequality among citizens, both in legal and formal aspects and in socio-political practices. Second, colonial citizenship practices recognized Indigenous people as slaves of the colonized rather than as first-class citizens.

Keywords


Natives; Citizen; Citizenship Space; Population Classification

References


Algemeen Politiestrafreglement. (1872).

Algemene Bepalingen van wetgeving voor Indonesie. (1848).

Anderson, B. (2008). Imagined communities: Komunitas-komunitas terbayang. Insist dan Pustaka Pelajar.

Gautama, S. (1987). Warga negara dan orang asing: Berikut peraturan dan contoh-contoh. Penerbit Alumni.

Heijs, E. J. (1995). Van vreemdeling tot Nederlander: De verlening van het Nederlanderschap aan vreemdelingen (1813-1992). Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.

Hock, L. O. (1961). Tjatatan sipil di Indonesia (K. Po, Ed.).

Kuntowijoyo. (2003). Metodologi sejarah. Tiara Wacana Yogya.

Kwartanada, D. (2011). Dari Timur Asing ke Orang Indonesia: Pemuda Tionghoa dan Arab dalam Pergerakan Nasional (1900-1942). Prisma, 30(2).

Paulus, B. (1979). Garis besar hukum tata negara Hindia-Belanda. Alumni.

Purwanto, B. (2019). Praktik kewarganegaraan di Indonesia dalam perspektif historiografis. [Publikasi tidak terpublikasi].

Regeringsreglement. (1848).

Sholikhah, F. (2010). Terpaksa menjadi asing: Surat Bukti Kewarganegaraan Indonesia (SBKI) dan pencarian identitas kebangsaan Indonesia pascakolonial [Skripsi sarjana, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. Repositori UGM.

Staatblaad No. 75. (1933).

Staatblaad No. 751. (1920).

Sugondo, S., & Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia. (2005). Pokok-pokok pikiran dan paradigma baru catatan sipil nasional. Komnas HAM.

Sutopo, U. (2011). Pengantar tata hukum di Indonesia sebagai bagian pengenalan dasar ilmu hukum di Indonesia. Sinergi Karya Mulia.

Wertheim, W. F., Ellizabet, M. Z., & Husein, A. F. (1999). Masyarakat Indonesia dalam transisi: Studi perubahan sosial. Tiara Wacana Yogya.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/pby.v5i2.16614

 

 

Editorial office:

History Education Study Program
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Lambung Mangkurat University
Jl. Brigjen H. Hasan Basry, Kayu Tangi, Banjarmasin 70123, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]

 

 Flag Counter

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
Prabayaksa published by the History Education Study Program of Lambung Mangkurat University has a license under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License