Perbedaan perilaku membuang sampah pada siswa antara sebelum dan sesudah diberikan live and symbolic modelling
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Perilaku membuang sampah merupakan aktivitas fisik individu yang terlihat jelas sebagai suatu hasil pembiasaan yang dibentuk oleh lingkungan. Salah satu cara agar dapat membentuk perilaku kebiasaan dalam perilaku membuang sampah pada tempatnya dan sesuai warna tempat sampah adalah dengan menggunakan teknik modeling. Modeling merupakan cara pembelajaran individu dengan mempelajari dan mengamati langsung saat model berperilaku serta dapat menggunakan simbol-simbol yang mewakili informasi sebagai media modeling. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan perilaku membuang sampah pada siswa kelas V antara sebelum dan sesudah diberikan live and symbolic modeling oleh guru. Hipotesis yang diajukan penelitian ini adalah ada perbedaan perilaku membuang sampah pada siswa antara sebelum dan sesudah diberikan live and symbolic modeling oleh guru. Subjek pada penelitian ini berjumlah 20 orang. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teknik sampling jenuh, yaitu teknik penentuan sampel bila semua anggota populasi digunakan sebagai sampel. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan skala perilaku membuang sampah. Hasil perhitungan observasi saat pre-test sebesar 33.3%, sedangkan hasil perhitungan observasi saat post-test sebesar 86,7%. Dengan didukung dengan hasil uji t berpasangan menemukan perbedaan perilaku membuang sampah antara sebelum dan sesudah diberikan live and symbolic modeling. Sehingga sumbangan efektif perlakuan live and symbolic modeling untuk perilaku membuang sampah cukup berarti dengan hasil setelah perlakuan sebesar 86,7%, Sedangkan 13,3% lainnya merupakan variable-variabel lain yang tidak diteliti pada penelitian ini. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan live and symbolic modeling memberikan peningkatan pada perilaku siswa dalam membuang sampah pada tempatnya dan sesuai warna tempat sampah.
Kata kunci: perilaku membuang sampah, live and symbolic modeling, siswa sekolah dasar, guru.
ABSTRACT
Littering behavior is an individual physical activity which is a result of habituation developed by environment. One of the ways to develop the habitual behavior in throwing litter into the proper places and the corresponding bin colors is by applying the modeling technique. Modeling is an individual’s learning way through studying and direct observing the current behavior of others and using symbols that represent information as a modeling medium. The objective of this study was to find out the differences in littering behavior of class V students between before and after provided with live and symbolic modeling by the teacher. The proposed hypothesis was that there were differences in littering behavior of class V students between before and after provided with live and symbolic modeling by the teacher. The subjects were 20 people. The sampling technique used in this study was saturated sampling technique. Data were collected using the scale of littering behavior. The calculation result of the observation in pre-test was 33.3% while in post-test 86.7%. The results of the paired t test showed that there were differences in littering behavior between before and after the students were provided with live and symbolic modeling. The effective contribution of live and symbolic modeling treatment to the littering behavior was significant where the outcome after the treatment was 86.7% while 13.3% was from other variables not examined in this study. It can be concluded that live and symbolic modeling improved student behavior in throwing litter into the proper places and the corresponding bin colors.
Keywords: littering behavior, live and symbolic modeling, elementary school students, teachers.
References
Aguilar-Luzon, M.C., Calvo-Salgue ro, A.,& Salinas, J.M. (2014). Beliefs and environmental behavior : the moderating effect of emotional intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 55: 619-629
Ajaegbo, E. (2012). The determinant of littering attitude in Urban neigbourhoods of jos. JORIND. 10 (3) ISSN 1596-8308.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Bahvior and Human Decision Procesess. 50: 179-211.
Aziz, H.A. (2012). Karakter guru profesional, melahirkan murid unggul menjawab tantangan masa depan. Jakarta Selatan: Al-Mawardi Prima.
Azwar, S. (2012). Metode penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajat Offset.
Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York City: General Learning Press.
Bandura. A, Ross. D, & Ross. S.A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Stanford University. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963. Vol. 66, No.1.
Brannon, Y. (2010). Littering in wake county: attitudes, behavior, and perspectives on prevention. Nort Caroline State University.
Brigham, J.C. (1991). Social psychology 2nd. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Chandra, B. (2006). Pengantar kesehatan lingkungan. Jakarta: EGC.
Colman, A.M. (2009). Oxford dictionary of psychology. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R.A., & Spinrad, T.L. (2007). Prosocial development chapter 11. Published online: Wiley Online Library DOI: 10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0311.
Frankel, J.P. & Wallen, N.E. (2008). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Geotimes, (2015). Produksi sampah di Indonesia 67,1 juta ton sampah per tahun. Diakses pada tanggal 15 februari 2016 dari http://geotimes.co.id/2019-produksi-sampah-di-indonesia-671-juta-ton-sampah-per-tahun/
Gifford, R. & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior: A review. International Journal of Psychology. Vol 49 (3): 141-157. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12034
Gifford, R.,Steg, L. & Reser, J.P. (2011). Environmental psychology chapter 18. IAAP Handbook of Applied Psychology, First Edition. Blackwell Publishing
Gunawan, M.A. (2015). Statistik penelitian bidang pendidikan, psikologi, dan sosial. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing
Hansmann, R. Dan Steimer, N. 2015. Linking an integradative behavior model to elements of environmental campaigns: an analysis of face to face communication and posters againts littering. Sustainability. 7: 6937-6956. DOI: 10.3390/su7066937.
Hart, K. E. & Kritsonis, W. A. (2006). Critical analysis of an original writing on social learning theory: imitation of film-mediated aggresive models by: Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ross and Sheila A. Ross (1963). National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal. Vol.19, No.3.
Hergenhahn, B. R. & Olson, M. H. (2008). Theories of learning (teori belajar) edisi ke tujuh. Jakarta: Kencana.
Hogg, M.A., & Tindale, R.S. (2001). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: group processes. USA: Blackwell Publishers, hlm.293.
Hurlock, Elizabeth. B. (1992). Psikologi perkembangan: suatu pendekatan sepanjang rentang kehidupan edisi ke lima. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Kartono, K. (1996). Pengantar metodologi research sosial. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
McGuigan, N., Makinson, J., & Whiten, A. (2011). From over-imitation to Super-copying: adults imitate causally irrelevant aspects of tool use with higher fidelity than young children. British Journal Of Psychology. (102) 1-18. DOI: 10.1348/000712610X493115
Mensah, P.O., Adjaottor, A.A., & Boateng, G.O. (2014). Characterization of solid waste in the atwima-nwabiagya district of the ashanti region, kumashi Ghana. International Journal of Waste Management and Technology. Vol. 2 (1) PP: 1-14, ISSN: 2327-8757.
Myers, A., & Hansen, C. (2002). Experimental psychology. USA: Wadsworth.
Ngalimun. (2013). Pelaksanaan layanan bimbingan konseling di SD/MI. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Notoatmodjo, S. (2012). Promosi kesehatan dan perilaku kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Oluyinka, O. Dan Balogun, S.K. 2011. Psycho-sosiocultural analysis of attitude toward littering in a Nigerian Urban City. Ethropia Journal Of Environmental Studies and Management. Vol.4 (1). DOI: 10.4314/ejesm.v4i1.9.
Ormrod, J. E. (2003). Educational psychology: developing learners fourth edition. Pearson Eduction, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Over, H. & carpenter, M. (2014). Children infer affiliative and status relations from watching other imitate. Developmental Science pp 1-9. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12275
Passer, M.W & Smith, R.E. (2001). Psychology, the science of mind and behavior (third edition). New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Priyatno. (2010). Paham analisis statistik data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta:Mediakom.
Quimby, C.C., & Angelique, H. (2011). Identifying barriers and catalysts to fostering pro-environmental behavior: opportunities and challenges for community psychology. Am J Community Psychol 47: 388-396 DOI: 10.1007/s10464-010-9389-7
Ritandiyono. (1998). Psikologi belajar. Jakarta: Gunadarma.
Santrock, J.W. (2002). Life span development: perkembangan masa hidup (edisi kelima). Jakarta: Erlangga
Seniati, L., Yulianto, A., & Setiadi, B.N. (2009). Psikologi eksperimen. Jakarta: PT. Indeks
.
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sumanto. (2014). Psikologi perkembangan : fungsi dan teori. CAPS (Center of Academic Publishing Service): Yogyakarta.
Supardi. (2013). Sekolah efektif, konsep dasar dan praktik. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suprihatiningrum, J. (2013). Guru profesional, pedoman kinerja, kualifikasi, dan kompetensi Guru. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Wood, L.A., Kendal, R.L., & Flynn, E.G. (2012). Context dependent model-based biases in cultural transmission: children’s imitation is offected by model age over model knowledge state. Evolutional Human Behavior (33) 387-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.11.010
Zmyj, N., Daum, M.M., & et al. (2012). Fourteen-month-olds’ imitation of differently aged models. Infant and Child Development. (21): 250-266. DOI: 10.1002/icd.
Article Statistic
Abstract view : 696 timesPDF views : 703 times
Dimensions Metrics
Article History
Submited : 24 August 2017Published : 27 September 2017
How To Cite This :
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Tia Anifa, Hemy Heryati Anward, Neka Erlyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
