GAMBARAN PENYEBAB TABLE-LITTERING DI KANTIN PADA LINGKUNGAN UNIVERSITAS
Abstract
Sampah dan perilaku membuang sampah sembarangan merupakan masalah yang dapat memiliki implikasi kesehatan, estetika, dan sosial. Salah satu bagian dari perilaku menyampah yang belum banyak dibahas dan diintervensi adalah perilaku table-littering, yaitu meninggalkan perlengkapan makan kotor di meja makan kantin atau restoran setelah makan. Perilaku ini menyebabkan kantin atau restoran menjadi kotor dan berantakan. Selain itu, jika ada peralatan makan kotor di meja makan, maka akan menghambat pelanggan selanjutnya yang akan makan di meja tersebut. Belum banyak penelitian yang membahas tentang perilaku ini dan penyebab-penyebabnya. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, penelitian ini bertujuan menggambarkan penyebab pengunjung kantin melakukan table-littering serta persepsi pengunjung kantin mengenai penyediaan bussing station sebagai opsi solusi untuk mengurangi table-littering. Wawancara semi-terstruktur dilakukan terhadap 20 mahasiswa, 8 penjual makanan di kantin, dan 4 petugas kebersihan. Analisis tema terhadap respons partisipanmenunjukkan lima alasan sebagai penyebab littering: malas, terburu-buru, merasa bahwa membereskan meja adalah tanggung jawab petugas kebersihan, tidak terbiasa, dan lupa. Penyediaan bussingstationdipersepsi sebagai opsi mengurangi table-litteringdi kantin lingkungan universitas.
Keywords
References
Al-Khatib, I. A., Arafat, H. A., Daoud, R., & Shwahneh, H. (2009). Enhanced solid waste management by understanding the effects of gender, income, marital status, and religious convictions on attitudes and practices, related to street littering in Nablus – Palestinian territory. Waste Management, 29, 449-455. Doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.004
Aoyagi-Usui, M., Vinken, H., & Kuribayashi, A. (2003). Pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors: An international comparison. Research in Human Ecology, 10 (1), 23-31. Retrieved https://www.jstor.org/stable/24707084
Bagozzi, R. P., & Moore, D. J. (1994). Public service advertisement: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58, 56-70. Doi: 10.2307/1252251
Bateson, M., Callow, L., Holmes, J. R., Roche, M. L., & Nettle, D. (2013). Do images of ‘watching eyes’ induce behaviour that is more pro-social or more normative? A field experiment on littering. PLoS ONE, 8 (12), 1-9. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0082055
Bator, R. J., Bryan, A. D., & Schultz, P. W. (2011). Who gives a hoot?: intercept surveys of litterers and disposers. Environment and Behavior, 43 (3), 295-315. Doi: 10.1177/0013916509356884
Berenguer, J. (2010). The effect of empathy in environmental moral reasoning. Environment and Behavior Volume, 42 (1), 110-134. Doi: 10.1177/0013916508325892
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Durdan, C. A., Reeder, G. D., & Hecht, P. R. (1985). Litter in a university cafeteria: Demographic data and the use of prompts as an intervention strategy. Environment and Behavior, 17 (3), 387-404. Doi: 10.1177/0013916585173007
Femina. (2018). Wajah Baru Food Court Plaza Senayan. Diakses 30 Juli 2018 dari https://www.femina.co.id/biznews/wajah-baru-food-court-plaza-senayan.
Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual review of psychology, 65, 541-579. Doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Kim, S., Jeong, S., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Predictors of pro-environmental behaviors of american and korean students: The application of the theory of reasoned action and protection motivation theory. Science Communication, 35(2), 168-188. Doi: 10.1177/1075547012441692.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8 (3), 239-260. Doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401
Kumparan Style. (2017). Cerita Soal Kebiasaan Makan Orang Indonesia Viral di Media Sosial. Diakses pada 30 Juli 2018 dari https://kumparan.com/@kumparanstyle/cerita-soal-kebiasaan-makan-orang-indoneisa-viral-di-media-sosial
Meeker, F. L. (1997). A comparison of table-littering behavior in two settings: A case for a contextual research strategy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 59-68. Doi: 10.1006/ jevp.1996.0039
Miller, N. D., Meindl, J. N., & Caradine, M. (2016). The effects of bin proximity and visual prompts on recycling in a university building. Behavioral and Social Issues, 25, 4-10. Doi: 10.5210/bsi.v.25i0.6141
Oluyinka, O. (2011). Attitude towards littering as a mediator of the relationship between personality attributes and responsible environmental behavior. Waste Management, 31, 2601-2611. Doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.08.014
Schultz, P. W., Bator, R., Large, L. B., Bruni, C. M., & Tabanico, J. J. (2013). Littering in context: Personal and environmental predictors of littering behavior. Environment and Behavior, 45 (1), 35-59. Doi: 10.1177/0013916511412179
Sevillano, V., Aragonés, J. I., & Schultz, P. W. (2007). Perspective taking, environmental concern, and the moderating role of dispositional empathy. Environment and behavior, 39(5), 685-705. Doi: 10.1177/0013916506292334
Shadiqi, M. A., Heryati Anward, H., & Erlyani, N. (2013). Hubungan Antara Kecerdasan Emosional dengan Perilaku Pro-Lingkungan Serta Perbedaannya berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin. Ecopsy, 1(1). Doi: 10.20527/ecopsy.v1i1.478
Sibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2003). Differentiating active and passive littering: A two-stage process model of littering behavior in public spaces. Environment and Behavior, 35 (3), 415-433. Doi: 10.1177/0013916503251446
Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104-115. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002
Steg, L., Lindenberg, S., & Keizer, K. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, norms and environmental behaviour: the dynamics of overarching goals. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(1–2), 179-207. DOI: 10.1561/101.00000077
Torgler, B., Frey, B. S., & Wilson, C. (2009). Environmental and pro-social norms: Evidence on littering. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9 (1), 1-39. Doi: 10.2202/1935-1682.1929
Article Statistic
Abstract view : 1633 timesPDF (Bahasa Indonesia) views : 1463 times
Dimensions Metrics
Article History
Submited : 4 July 2018Published : 30 August 2018
How To Cite This :
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Megariza Megariza, Laras Sekarasih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
