PELANGGARAN MAKSIM TUTUR DALAM PEMILIHAN CALON PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 2019 (VIOLATION OF THE SPEECH ACT MAXIM IN THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES ELECTION DEBATE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA IN 2019)

Novi Paraswanty

Abstract


Abstract
Violation of the speech maxim in the Presidential Candidates Election Debate of the
Republic of indonesia In 2019.This research was aimed at describing the forms of violation
of the speech act maxim and describing the functions of violationofspeech act maxim in the
presidential candidate election debate of the Republic of Indonesia in 2019. This research was
qualitative, and conducted by using the descriptive method. The soutce of data was the
Presidential Candidate Election Debate of the Republic of Indonesia in 2019. The research
results of speech maxim violation in the Presidential Candidate Election Debate of the
Republic of Indonesia in 2019 consist of 5 research problems, which are: (1) the form of
quantity of maxim violation, (2) the form of quality of maxim violation, (3) the form of relevance
of maxim violation, (4) the form of method of maxim violation, and (5) the functions of speech
acts of maxim violation. The form of quantity maxim violation consists of statements containing
answers that comprise the information needed. The form of quality maxim violation consists of
statements that contain answers which are less convincing, and contain answers which are
similar or agree to the questions, and also contain answers which the evidence is not true. The
form of relevance maxim violation consists of statements which contain answers that are not
relevance with the questions and contain the contents of the correct answer but are not
relevance. The form of method maxim violation consists of statements which contain
ambiguous answers, and contain long and wordy answers. The function of the speech acts has
four functions: Representative function which consists of statements of affirmation, conclusion,
and facts. Expressive function consists of statements of praise, difficulty, happiness, and
misery. Directive function consists of statements of ordering, advising, and commanding.
Commissive function consists of statements of promise, rejection, and threat.
Keywords:violation of speech maxim, debate

 


Abstrak
Pelanggaran Maksim Tutur Dalam Debat Pemilihan Calon Presiden Republik Indonesia
Tahun 2019. Tujuan pada penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan wujud pelangaran maksim dan
mendeskripsikan fungsi tindak tutur pelanggaran maksim dalam debat pemilihan calon
Presiden Republik Indonesia tahun 2019. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif,
dengan metode deskriptif. Sumber data penelitian ini ialah debat pemilihan calon Presiden
Republik Indonesia tahun 2019. Hasil penelitian dari pelanggaran maksim tutur dalam debat
Pemilihan Calon Presiden Republik Indonesia tahun 2019 ini terdiri dari lima rumusan
masalah yaitu : (1) wujud pelanggaran maksim kuantitas, (2) wujud pelanggaran maksim
kualitas, (3) wujud pelanggaran maksim relevansi, (4) wujud pelanggaran maksim cara, dan
(5) fungsi tindak tutur pelanggaran maksim. Wujud pelanggaran maksim kuantitas terdiri dari
pernyataan yang mengandung jawaban yang melebihi informasi yang dibutuhkan. Wujud
pelanggaran maksim kualitas berupa pernyataan yang mengandung jawaban yang kurang
meyakinkan, mengandung jawaban yang sama atau sependapat, dan mengandung jawaban
yang bukti kebenarannya tidak benar. Wujud pelanggaran maksim relevansi terdiri dari
pernyataan yang mengandung jawaban yang tidak sesuai dengan pertanyaan, dan
mengandung isi jawaban yang benar tapi tidak sesuai. Wujud pelanggaran maksim cara terdiri
dari pernyataan yang mengandung jawaban yang ambigu, dan mengandung jawaban panjang
lebar, bertele-tele. Fungsi tindak tutur memiliki empat fungsi yaitu: Fungsi representatif yang
terdiri dari pernyataan penegasan, kesimpulan, fakta. Fungsi ekspresif terdiri dari pernyataan
memuji, kesulitan, kesenangan, kesengsaraan. Fungsi direktif terdiri dari pernyataan
menyuruh, memberi saran, perintah. Fungsi komisif terdiri dari pernyataan janji, penolakan,
ancaman.
Kata-kata kunci: pelanggaran maksim tutur, debat


Full Text:

PDF

References


Https//youtu.be/E6G85GvYdzw.

Https//youtu.be/O_Rd2bDHZle.

Https//youtu.be/3MqHw_OEJNo.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics, London: Cambridge University Press.

Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jbsp.v10i2.9373

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 215 times
PDF - 455 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 JURNAL BAHASA, SASTRA DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA (JBSP)



Indexed By:

    

    


JURNAL BAHASA, SASTRA, DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA © 2013 by Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Lambung Mangkurat is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0