Argumentation in Science Learning : Strategies and Opportunities

Andina Armelia; Syayidah Dinurrohmah; Nurul Fitriyah Sulaeman; Abdul Hakim; Muliati Syam; Tomohiro Takebayashi

doi:10.20527/jmscedu.v5i1.14871

Argumentation in Science Learning : Strategies and Opportunities

Andina Armelia, Syayidah Dinurrohmah, Nurul Fitriyah Sulaeman, Abdul Hakim, Muliati Syam, Tomohiro Takebayashi

Abstract

This study aims to determine trends in a research article that measures argumentation skills carried out by students in science learning. This is important to know because argumentation is an important skill to be mastered by students. This research was conducted using a meta-analysis approach of relevant research articles. The articles used as samples in this study are articles published in the range of 2022 to 2024. The analysis found that research measuring students' argumentation skills in science learning was mostly published in 2023 and conducted at the junior high school level. The learning model most applied by researchers is the conventional learning model, with the data collection instrument in the form of essay tests. The assessment instrument most widely used by researchers to measure students' argumentation skills is based on TAP indicators with quantitative data analysis techniques.

Keywords

Argumentation; Literature review; Science; Students

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmad, A., & Maysarah, A. (2023). Meningkatkan Keterampilan menulis siswa dalam esai argumentatif melalui penilaian portofolio. Jurnal Kependidikan Profesi, 1, 165–171.

Al-Qaisi, D. A. (2023). Investigating the reality of using quantitative methods in improving decisions in a sample of public industrial sector companies. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(6).

Arfiany, N., Yunus, S. R., & Negeri, U. (2021). Pengaruh model pembelajaran argument-driven inquiry ( adi ) terhadap peningkatan keterampilan argumentasi dan hasil belajar ipa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sains, 4(April), 24–35.

Bubikova-Moan, J., & Sandvik, M. (2022). Argumentation in early childhood : A systematic review. Human Development, 66, 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1159/000527293

Drymiotou, I., Constantinou, C. P., & Avraamidou, L. (2021). Enhancing students’ interest in science and understandings of stem careers: The role of career-based scenarios. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 717–736.

Fatmawati, D. R., Harlita, & Ramli, M. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi siswa melalui action research dengan fokus tindakan think pair share. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 15(1), 253–259.

Firdaus, A. A., Budhi, S., & Suwandi, S. (2024). Implementasi pembelajaran menulis teks argumentasi dengan model problem based learning di sma negeri 1 ngrambe. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(3), 3223–3233.

Gnawali, Y. P. (2022). Ganeshman darpan use of mathematics in quantitative research. Ganeshman Darpan, 7(1), 1.

Guilfoyle, L., Erduran, S., & Park, W. (2021). An investigation into secondary teachers’ views of argumentation in science and religious education. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 42(2), 190–204.

Hardini, S. D., & Alberida, H. (2022). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi peserta didik. Biodidaktika: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 17(1), 93–99.

Haruna, A., & Nahadi. (2021). Menjelajahi hubungan level argumentasi dengan kemampuan berfikir kritis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal ikatan kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(1), 2686–2694.

Hasanah, F., Putra, P. D. A., & Rusdianto. (2022). Identifikasi kemampuan siswa smp dalam berargumentasi melalui pendekatan pembelajaran science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem). Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 3(1), 1–9.

https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v3i1.974

Hidayatullah, Z., Wilujeng, I., Nurhasanah, N., Gusemanto, T. G., & Makhrus, M. (2021). Synthesis of the 21st century skills (4c) based physics education research in indonesia. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i1.1889

Jemalu, M. M. R. (2021). Perbandingan model problem based learning (pbl) dan model pembelajaran konvesional terhadap hasil belajar ips terpadu siswa smp negeri 6 welak. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Ekonomi, 6(2), 71–85.

Lobczowski, N. G., Allen, E. M., Firetto, C. M., Greene, J. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2020). An exploration of social regulation of learning during scientific argumentation discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101925.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101925

Mardhiyah, R. H., Aldriani, S. N. F., Chitta, F., & Zulfikar, M. R. (2021). Pentingnya keterampilan belajar di abd 21 sebagai tuntutan dalam pengembangan sumber daya manusia. Lectura:Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 29–40.

Miaturrohmah, M., & Fadly, W. (2020). Looking at a portrait of student argumentation skills on the concept of inheritance (21st century skills study). INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 1(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v1i1.2056

Miralda-Banda, A., Garcia-Mila, M., & Felton, M. (2021). Concept of evidence and the quality of evidence-based reasoning in elementary students. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy, 40(2), 359–372.

Mongkau, J. G., Daniel, R., & Pangkey, H. (2024). Kurikulum Merdeka : Memperkuat keterampilan abad 21 untuk generasi emas. Journal on Education, 6(4), 22018–22030.

Mulyani, A., Hartono, H., Subali, B., & Semarang, U. N. (2024). Literature review : A snapshot of research on the argumentation of bibliometric analysis in the period 2015-2023. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 12(2), 451–465.

Noroozi, O. (2022). The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Reults (Volume I) : The State of Learning and Equility in Education, PISA. Paris : OECD Publishing.

Putri, M., Fadilah, M., Fuadiyah, S., & Anggriyani, R. (2024). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik pada materi perubahan lingkungan kelas x di man 2 tanah datar. Biogenerasi : Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(1), 102–108.

Putri, S. A., Sulaeman, N. F., & Putra, P. D. A. (2022). Trend of technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) untuk guru ipa pra-jabatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(2), 165–175.

Riwayani, R., Perdana, R., Sari, R., Jumadi, J., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi optik: Problem-based learning berbantuan edu-media simulation. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 45–53.

https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22548

Rustamana, A., Wahyuningsih, P., Azka, M. F., & Wahyu, P. (2024). Penelitian metode kuantitatif. Sindoro Cendikia Pendidikan, 5(6).

Sinambela, C., Rumondor, S. B., Sura, Y., & Bahri, A. (2023). Melatih keterampilan argumentasi menggunakan model pembelajaran rtps pelajaran biologi sma advent supiori. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi FMIPA UNM, 420–426.

Tanfiziyah, R., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2021). Profil kemampuan argumentasi siswa mengenai isu sosiosaintifik dalam pembelajaran online. BIOSFER : Jurnal Biologi Dan Pendidikan Biologi, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.23969/biosfer.v6i1.4081

Triani, E., Darmaji, & Astalini. (2023). Identifikasi keterampilan proses sains dan kemampuan berargumentasi siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppii.v13i1.57131

Waruwu, M., Natijatul, S., Utami, P. R., Yanti, E., & Rusydiana, M. (2025). Metode penelitian kuantitatif : Konsep, jenis , tahapan dan kelebihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profe Pendidikan, 10(1), 917–932.

Wisutama, R. A., Sulaeman, N. F., Dwi, P., & Putra, A. (2024). Fostering argumentation skills through STEM-EDP project : An exploration of students ’ argumentation pattern. 8(1), 54–66.

Yahya, F. A., Taman, B., Hadi, W. P., Sidik, R. F., & Rakhmawan, A. (2022). Analisis keterampilan argumentasi siswa pada materi tata surya smp al-baisuny kokop. Natural Science Education Research, 5(2), 112–118.

Yudistira, A. B., & Fauziah, H. N. (2023). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan masalah berbasis isu sosiosaintifik. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 1–8.

Zaroh, I., Muntholib, M., & Joharmawan, R. (2022). Implementasi instrumen asesmen argumentasi ilmiah materi laju reaksi. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 6(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v6i1.12191

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jmscedu.v5i1.14871