Fraud Prevention Legal Certainty Principle In Health Sector and Implementation of Health Insurance Program in Indonesia

Endah Labati Silapurna

doi:10.20527/jbk.v8i1.12855

Fraud Prevention Legal Certainty Principle In Health Sector and Implementation of Health Insurance Program in Indonesia

Endah Labati Silapurna

Abstract

The Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) says that high number of potential irregularities occurs most often in the health sector and in the implementation of the National health insurance program as obtained through efforts to prevent, coordinate, and synergize with relevant government agencies, such as the BPK, the BPKP, etc. It is important for early detection of fraud along with repressive actions and sanctions that need to be followed up if there is such a potential. The issues to be discussed here are How do the laws and regulations regulate fraud prevention in the health sector in Indonesia, What is the relationship between the statutory norms regarding Fraud Prevention and the Principle of Legal Certainty? This research method uses a normative juridical approach, and the specifications of the data used in this study are qualitative secondary data. The data collection method used is literature study. The conclusion, in the form of a provisional answer: if regulations are formed relating to fraud prevention in Indonesia referring to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, where everyone is entitled and guaranteed by the constitution to maintain life and receive services maximally, then the principle of legal certainty is fulfilled.

Keywords

Fraud prevention, principle of legal certainty, statutory norms

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Koeswadji, Hermien Hadiati. Beberapa Permasalahan Hukum dan Medik. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti; 1992.

Nasution BJ. Hukum Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2019.

Fraudulent financial reporting: pengujian teori fraud pentagon pada sektor keuangan dan perbankan di Indonesia. Gunawan, C. T. and Harto, P. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX; 2016.

Tugas FC. Exploring a New Element of Fraud: A Study on Chosen Financial Accounting Fraud Cases in the World. American International Journal of Contemporary Research; 2012.

Marzuki PM. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana; 2008.

Syahrani HR. Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti; 1999.

Ali A. Menguak tabir hukum: suatu kajian filosofis dan sosiologis. Jakarta: Toko Gunung Agung; 2002.

Atmadja IDG Asas-asas Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum. Kertha Wicaksana. 2018; 12(2): 145-55.

Brotodiharjo, R. S. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Pajak. Bandung: Refika Aditama; 2011.

Cahyono SB. Membangun Budaya Keselamatan Pasien Dalam Praktek Kedokteran. Yogyakarta: Kanisius; 2008.

Crumbley DL, Friedman JP, Anders SB. Dictionary of Tax Terms. s.l.: Barron's Educational Series; 1994.

Karni S. Audit Khusus dan Audit Forensik: Tantangan dan Peluang Bagi Auditor Independen. Ekuitas . 2016; 2(1): 36-50.

Lou YI, Wang ML Fraud Risk Factor of the Fraud Triangle Assessing the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER). 2011.

Marzuki, PM. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. s.l. : Kencana, 2008. 2009; 7(2): 61-78.

Parogo Tony. Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/PMK/2005 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia. 2016; 13(2): 191-201.

Singleton TW, Singleton AJ. Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2010.

Ta'adi, Hadiningsih T, Angelina, B. Hukum Kesehatan: Sanksi dan Motivasi Bagi Perawat. Jakarta: ECG; 2013.

Abdullahi R, Mansor N. Fraud triangle theory and fraud diamond theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent for Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 2015; 5(4): 38-45.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jbk.v8i1.12855