Medical Use of Intelligent Systems

Rita Komalasari

doi:10.20527/jbk.v9i2.14593

Medical Use of Intelligent Systems

Rita Komalasari

Abstract

This essay delves into the ethical implications of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into medical practice, addressing a critical gap in the existing research. As AI-driven medical systems have gained prominence over the past decade, there is an urgent need to explore the moral dimensions of their utilization. This study holds significant relevance for academics, healthcare professionals, and policymakers, especially those involved in intelligent medical systems. The exploration begins by dissecting the moral dilemmas surrounding AI applications in healthcare, exploring both technological justifications and concerns. The paper evaluates existing taxonomies developed by researchers in the field, shedding light on the issues that emerge during the development of intelligent medical systems. By scrutinizing the ethical reasons behind healthcare practitioners' adoption of intelligent systems, this research contributes valuable insights for a comprehensive understanding of the subject. This analysis not only informs scholars but also provides crucial guidance to government officials and medical professionals navigating the intricate landscape of AI in medicine.

Keywords

Intelligent systems, drug delivery, better treatment

Full Text:

PDF

References

Khan I, Dewangan B, Meena A, Birthare M. Study of Various Cloud Service Providers: A Comparative Analysis. In5th International Conference on Next Generation Computing Technologies (NGCT-2019); 2020 Mar 1.

Maedche A, Legner C, Benlian A, Berger B, Gimpel H, Hess T, Hinz O, Morana S, Söllner M. AI-based digital assistants. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2019 Aug;61(4):535-44.

Kaur PD, Chana I. Cloud based intelligent system for delivering health care as a service. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2014;1:113(1):346-59.

Sparrow R Killer robots. Journal of applied philosophy. 2007;24(1):62-77.

Brown KC. A Consideration of Mason's Ethical Framework: The Importance of PAPA Factors in the 21st Century: A Seven-Year Study.

Young JA, Smith TJ, Zheng SH. Call me BIG PAPA: An extension of Mason's information ethics framework to big data. Journal of the Midwest Association for Information Systems. 2020; 2:17-41.

Keshta I, Odeh A. Security and privacy of electronic health records: Concerns and challenges. Egyptian Informatics Journal. 2021;1:22(2):177-83.

Askitopoulou H, Vgontzas AN. The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times. European spine journal. 2018;27(7):1481-90.

Veatch RM. Hippocratic, religious, and secular ethics: The points of conflict. Theoretical medicine and bioethics. 2012; 33(1):33-43.

Nissenbaum H. Protecting privacy in an information age: The problem of privacy in public. InThe Ethics of Information Technologies. 2020(13): 141-178..

Kaelber DC, Jha AK, Johnston D, Middleton B, Bates DW. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2008;15(6):729-36.

Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. Pharmacy and therapeutics. 2014;39(7):491.

Ekblaw A, Azaria A, Halamka JD, Lippman A. A Case Study for Blockchain in Healthcare: MedRec prototype for electronic health records and medical research data. InProceedings of IEEE open & big data conference. 2016;13:13.

Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation of science: current and future directions. American Journal of Public Health. 2012;102(7):1274-81.

Yaacoub JP, Noura M, Noura HN, Salman O, Yaacoub E, Couturier R, Chehab A. Securing internet of medical things systems: Limitations, issues and recommendations. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2020;105:581-606.

Morley J, Floridi L, Kinsey L, Elhalal A. From what to how: an initial review of publicly available AI ethics tools, methods and research to translate principles into practices. Science and engineering ethics. 2020;26(4):2141-68.

Krittanawong C, Johnson KW, Choi E, Kaplin S, Venner E, Murugan M, Wang Z, Glicksberg BS, Amos CI, Schatz MC, Tang WW. Artificial Intelligence and Cardiovascular Genetics. Life. 2022;12(2):279.

Toreini E, Aitken M, Coopamootoo K, Elliott K, Zelaya CG, Van Moorsel A. The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologies. InProceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency 2020:272-283.

Mason RO. Four ethical issues of the information age. InComputer ethics. Routledge: 2017:pp. 41-8.

Dilsizian SE, Siegel EL. Artificial intelligence in medicine and cardiac imaging: harnessing big data and advanced computing to provide personalized medical diagnosis and treatment. Current cardiology reports. 2014;16(1):1-8.

Coventry L, Branley D. Cybersecurity in healthcare: A narrative review of trends, threats and ways forward. Maturity. 2018; 113:48-52.

Coventry L, Branley D. Cybersecurity in healthcare: A narrative review of trends, threats and ways forward. Maturity. 2018;113:48-52.

Longoni C, Bonezzi A, Morewedge CK. Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research. 2019;46(4):629-50.

Osoba OA, Welser IV W. An intelligence in our image: The risks of bias and errors in artificial intelligence. Rand Corporation; 2017.

Alazzam MB, Tayyib N, Alshawwa SZ, Ahmed M. Nursing care systematization with case-based reasoning and artificial intelligence. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2022.

Cai CJ, Winter S, Steiner D, Wilcox L, Terry M. Hello AI: uncovering the onboarding needs of medical practitioners for human-AI collaborative decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction. 2019.3(CSCW):1-24.

Musen MA, Middleton B, Greenes RA. Clinical decision-support systems. InBiomedical informatics. Springer, Cham: 2021:795-840.

Cockburn IM, Henderson R, Stern S. The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation: An exploratory analysis. InThe economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda 2018 Jan 10. University of Chicago Press.115-146

Luengo-Oroz M, Hoffmann PK, Bullock J, Kirkpatrick R, Luccioni A, Rubel S, Wachholz C, Chakchouk M, Biggs P, Nguyen T, Purnat T. Artificial intelligence cooperation to support the global response to COVID-19. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2020;2(6):295-7.

Brewer E, Demmer M, Du B, Ho M, Kam M, Nedevschi S, Pal J, Patra R, Surana S, Fall K. The case for technology in developing regions. Computers. 2005;38(6):25-38.

Floridi L. Information ethics. The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics. 2010:77-99.

Gorla N, Somers TM, Wong B. Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2010;19(3):207-28.

Wu JH, Wang YM. Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean's model. Information & management. 2006;43(6):728-39.

Shim M, Jo HS. What quality factors matter in enhancing the perceived benefits of online health information sites? Application of the updated DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2020; 137:104093.

Jeyaraj A. DeLone & McLean models of information system success: Critical meta-review and research directions. International Journal of Information Management. 2020; 54:102139.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jbk.v9i2.14593