Five-Tier Diagnostic Test to Reveal Conceptual Understanding of Electrical Engineering Students

Doni Setiawan, Jaelani Jaelani

Abstract


The purpose of this research was to produce a valid five-tiered misconception diagnostic assessment product and reveal the understanding of electrical engineering students' concepts on the subject of simple electrical circuits. Assessment development consisted of defining, designing, developing, and disseminating stages. Data collection techniques were online questionnaire methods, online tests, and online interviews. Construct validity was obtained that the assessment was valid and reliable. A total of 19 questions were categorized as medium and one easy question. The analysis of the conceptual understanding test obtained results 29.98% of students who understood the concept, 31.4% did not understand the concept, 2.82% of false positive, 3.38% of false negative, and 31.12% with misconception. There were 26 kinds of student misconceptions identified. The dominant misconception identified in the concept of circuit resistance arrangement was 40.2%. Students assumed that electrons flow from high to low potential in a closed circuit with a DC voltage source. The research results in a five-tier diagnostic assessment can be used in vocational colleges in general. The results of data analysis show that the five-tier format of the assessment can reveal students' misconceptions in detail and, more specifically, distinguish students who have misconceptions from students who are false positive and false negative to reveal students who have misconceptions better. The researcher's development procedure can be used as an example for other researchers to develop a five-tier format diagnostic assessment on other basic concepts.  


Keywords


Conceptual Understanding; Electrical Engineering; Five-Tier Diagnostic Test

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Bayuni, T. C., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2018). Identification misconception of primary school teacher education students in changes of matters using a five-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012086

Berg, E. V. D. (1991). Miskonsepsi fisika dan remediasi. Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students' misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science ,& Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students' misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Linuwih, S. (2013). Konsepsi alternatif mahasiswa fisika pada materi termodinamika. UPEJ (Unnes Physics Education Journal), 2(3), https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v2i3.2929.

Mavhunga, E., Ibrahim, B., Qhobela, M., & Rollnick, M. (2016). Student teachers' competence to transfer strategies for developing PCK for electric circuits to another physical sciences topic. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3), 299–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2016.1237000

Muna, I. A. (2016). Identifikasi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pgmi pada konsep hukum newton menggunakan certainty of response index (CRI). Cendekia: Journal of Education and Society, 13(2), 309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v13i2.25

Setiawan, D. (2019). Mengungkap pemahaman konsep listrik dinamis di sekolah berbasis kemaritiman. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 3(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v3i2.361

Setiawan, D., & Faoziyah, N. (2020). Development of a five-tier diagnostic test to reveal the student concept in fluids. Physics Communication, 4(27), 6–13.

Sudijono, A. (2009). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Sujarweni, V. (2014). Metodologi penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi &Perubahan Konsep Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasrana Indonesia.

Syuhendri, S. (2014). Konsepsi alternatif mahasiswa pada ranah mekanika: analisis untuk konsep impetus dan kecepatan benda jatuh. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1), 56–67.

Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v9i3.11190

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 565 times
PDF - 295 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

     

The journal has been listed in:

 

Statistics Counter

1. From August 10, 2016 to present (broken code but the stats is still working)

 joomla
visitor View My Stats

2. From December 28, 2018 to present (updated stats)

View My Stats

Flag Counter

Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan fisika is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License