Analysis of Students' Attitudes and Difficulties in Studying Computational Physics

Revi Indriani, Akmam Akmam, Fatni Mufit, Rahmat Hidayat, Silvi Yulia Sari

Abstract


Ideally, students who study Computational Physics are required to think computationally. However, student learning outcomes tend to be low. Low learning outcomes are suspected by students having difficulties. One of the causes of learning difficulties is students' attitude in responding to learning. This study aims to determine student attitudes in studying Computational Physics and the factors influencing student learning difficulties. This research is descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The population in this study were students of Physics FMIPA UNP. The sample in this research is students who take Computational Physics courses in January-June 2021. The data analysis technique used is the multivariate analysis based on factor loading testing with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using Lisrel 8.80. The results showed that students' attitudes toward Computational Physics were good, with a percentage of student responses of 67.16%. Factors that influence learning difficulties are internal factors in the form of psychological factors in the aspect of interest (65%), motivational aspects (58%), and aspects of study habits (49%). Meanwhile, external factors do not affect students' difficulties in studying Computational Physics. Further research, it is necessary to carry out a similar analysis by taking into account other factors that are thought to influence the attitudes and difficulties of students in studying Computational Physics, both internal and external factors, so that they are better in determining the next steps to overcome student difficulties in studying Computational Physics.


Keywords


attitude; computational physics; learning difficulties

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akmam, A., Anshari, R., Amir, H., Jalinus, N., & Amran, A. (2018). Influence of learning strategy of cognitive conflict on student misconception in computational physics course. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012074

Angraini, L. M., Sudiarta, I. W., Qomariyah, N., Alaa, S., & Handayana, I. G. N. Y. (2019). Peningkatan kompetensi komputasi fisika dan kimia untuk mahasiswa program studi fisika fmipa universitas mataram. SELAPARANG Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan, 2(2), 37–41.

Arikunto, S. (2005). Prosedur penelitian. Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2014). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan saintifik. Rineka Cipta.

Aswar, C. (2017). Pencapaian hasil belajar melalui penumbuhan sikap Mahasiswa. Lantanida Journal, 2(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.22373/lj.v2i2.1408

Caballero, M. D., Kohlmyer, M. A., & Schatz, M. F. (2012). Implementing and assessing computational modeling in introductory mechanics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020106

Cahill, M. J., McDaniel, M. A., Frey, R. F., Hynes, K. M., Repice, M., Zhao, J., & Trousil, R. (2018). Understanding the relationship between student attitudes and student learning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010107

Dimyanti, M. (2012). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. PT Rineka Cipta.

Dini, M. R., Maison, & Darmaji. (2021). Sikap siswa terhadap fisika dan hubungannya dengan hasil belajar fisika di sman 6 kota jambi. Pedagonal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 05(01), 51–55. http://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/pedagonal

Fanglin, P. (2014). Courses on computational physics in chinese universities and colleges. In Proceedings of the 12th Asia Pacific Physics Conference (APPC12), 017004, 1–6.

https://doi.org/10.7566/jpscp.1.017004

Hakim, T. (2005). Belajar secara efektif. Niaga Swadaya.

Hardiyanti, K., Astalini, A., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2018). Sikap siswa terhadap mata pelajaran fisika di sma negeri 5 muaro jambi. EduFisika, 3(02), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22437/edufisika.v3i02.4522

Indratno, T. K. (2019). Pengembangan modul komputasi fisika untuk mahasiswa jurusan kependidikan. Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v6i1.13395

Jati, B. M. . (2013). Pengantar fisika 1. Gajah Mada University Press.

Mahrus, A. (2013). Mengatasi kesulitan belajar melalui klinik pembelajaran (studi analisis pada mata pelajaran fisika). Konseling Religi: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam, 4(2), 263-294.

Nugraheni, D. (2017). Analisis kesulitan belajar mahasiswa pada mata kuliah mekanika. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematika, 5(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.51667/pjpk.v1i2.341

Pujimahanani, C. (2013). Pengaruh atraksi dosen atas dimensi daya tarik fisik terhadap sikap belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Sastra Dan Bahasa, 1(1), 37–51.

Setiawati, S. M. (2018). 'HELPER” Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling FKIP UNIPA. Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling FKIP UNIPA, 35(1), 31–46.

Siyoto, S., & Sodik, M. A. (2015). Dasar metodologi penelitian. Literasi Media Publishing.

Wahyudi, W. (2016). Analisis kontribusi sikap ilmiah, motivasi belajar dan kemandirian belajar terhadap prestasi belajar mahasiswa prodi pendidikan fisika stkip pgri pontianak. JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 1(2), 20–31.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i1.12408

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 352 times
PDF - 250 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

     

The journal has been listed in:

 

Statistics Counter

1. From August 10, 2016 to present (broken code but the stats is still working)

 joomla
visitor View My Stats

2. From December 28, 2018 to present (updated stats)

View My Stats

Flag Counter

Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan fisika is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License