Creativity in Deriving The Fermi-Dirac Equation  Through STEAM Approaches

Fauzan Sulman; Lia Yuliati; Boby Yasman Purnama; Muhammad Reyza Arief Taqwa; Rizki Ananda

doi:10.20527/bipf.v10i3.13182

Creativity in Deriving The Fermi-Dirac Equation Through STEAM Approaches

Fauzan Sulman, Lia Yuliati, Boby Yasman Purnama, Muhammad Reyza Arief Taqwa, Rizki Ananda

Abstract

This research is motivated by statistical physics learning in deriving the Fermi-Dirac equation conceptually from lecturers to students or by rote and low creativity of students. This study aims to explore student learning creativity in deriving the Fermi-Dirac equation through the STEAM approach. This study uses a didactic design that includes the stages of prospective analysis, didactic metapedia analysis, and prospective re-analysis, which is applied to the sixth-semester physics tadris student of UIN Sulthan Thahah Saifuddin Jambi. The research instrument used is a description test and a non-test through observation sheets and interviews. The results showed that the implementation of STEAM could increase the creativity of statistical physics with an achievement level of 87% asking questions, 78% learning outcomes, 75% reflection, and 75% analysis on the material of the Fermi-Dirac equation by adhering to student activities starting with phenomena that are easy to digest with the realistic situation during online lectures, which shows that the STEAM approach is quite well used in deriving the Fermi-Dirac equation in the online statistical physics course.

Keywords

Creativity; Fermi-Dirac Equation; STEAM Approach

Full Text:

PDF

References

Audunson, R. A., & Shuva, N. Z. (2016). Digital library education in europe: A survey. SAGE Open, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015622538

Baki, A., Çatlioǧlu, H., Coştu, S., & Birgin, O. (2009). Conceptions of high school students about mathematical connections to the real-life. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1402–1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.247

Creswell, John W ; Poth, C. N. (2017). A book review: Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. In Russian Journal of Sociology (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.13187/rjs.2017.1.30

Cropley, D. H., & Patston, T. J. (2019). Pre-publication version:

Cropley, D. H. and Patston, T. (2019). Supporting Creative teaching and learning in the classroom: Myths, models, and measures, In C. Mullen (Ed.), Creativity Under Duress in Education? Resistive Theories, Practices, and Actions ,. 15, 267–288.

Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. In Computers and Education (Vol. 142). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103635

Groenewald, T. (2004). A Phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300104

Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35(September 2019), 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education. In STEM Integration in K-12 Education. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612

Kuzmickaja, I., Wang, X., Graziotin, D., Dodero, G., & Abrahamsson, P. (2015). In need of creative mobile service ideas? Forget adults and ask young children. SAGE Open, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015601719

Legesse, M., Luneta, K., & Ejigu, T. (2020). Analyzing the effects of mathematical discourse-based instruction on eleventh-grade students’ procedural and conceptual understanding of probability and statistics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100918

Lehavi, Y., & Eylon, B.-S. (2018). Integrating science education research and history and philosophy of science in developing an energy curriculum. In History, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 235-260). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62616-1_9

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2

Meiliani, M., Tanti, T., & Sulman, F. (2021). Student resources on newton’s lawa concepts reviewing from gender: Identification using open-ended question. Indonesia Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 04(November), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i3.10177

Mullet, D. R., Kettler, T., & Sabatini, A. M. (2018). Gifted students’ conceptions of their high school stem education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217745156

Muwonge, C. M., Ssenyonga, J., Kibedi, H., & Schiefele, U. (2020). Use of self-regulated learning strategies Among Teacher Education students: A latent profile analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100037

Putra, M. I. J., Junaid, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). The ability of the question and answer (q&a) method with the help of learning videos against student learning outcomes amid the covid-19 pandemic. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 2160–2169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.768

Robinson, L. (2020). The STEM selfing process: Nondigital and digital determinants of aspirational stem futures. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(7), 950–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220919150

Rozal, E., Ananda, R., Zb, A., Fauziddin, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). The effect of project-based learning through youtube presentations on english learning outcomes in physics. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1924–1933. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.1241

Ryckman, T. (2015). Why history matters to philosophy of physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 50(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.09.010

Sarsengeldin, M., Satabaldiyev, A., Meirambek, Z., & Guvercin, S. (2013). Interdisciplinary connections and their influence on mathematical education of students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 866–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.946

Scott, T. F., & Schumayer, D. (2017). Conceptual coherence of non-Newtonian worldviews in Force Concept Inventory data. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010126

Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of flipped classroom on students’ learning experiences: A self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78(August), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.011

Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2021). Stealth assessment of creativity in a physics video game. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106647

Sulman, F. (2019). Application of cooperative problem posing and prior motivation towards students learning outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research (IJER), 4(2), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.30631/ijer.v4i2.126

Sulman, F., Sutopo, S., & Kusairi, S. (2021). FMCE-PHQ-9 assessment with rasch model in detecting concept understanding , cheating , and depression amid the covid-19 pandemic. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 6(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v6i2.9273

Sulman, F., Tanti, T., Habibi, M., & Zb, A. (2021). Pengaruh media animasi berkarakter islami terhadap hasil belajar pengetahuan bumi dan antariksa. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v5i1.1044

Sulman, F., Taqwa, M. R. A., Aminah Zb, A. Z., Rafzan, R., & Fikri, A. (2020). The effect of mathematical connections on the mastery of probability material. Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v3i2.645

Sulman, F., Yuliati, L., Kusairi, S., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Hybrid learning model : its impact on mastery of concepts and self- regulation in newton ’ s second law material. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v5i1.273

Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001

Sutopo, S. (2016). Students’ understanding of fundamental concepts of mechanical wave. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 12(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v12i1.3804

Weaver, J. P., Chastain, R. J., DeCaro, D. A., & DeCaro, M. S. (2018). Reverse the routine: Problem solving before instruction improves conceptual knowledge in undergraduate physics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.12.003

Weinberg, A. E., & Sample McMeeking, L. B. (2017). Toward meaningful interdisciplinary education: High school teachers’ views of mathematics and science integration. School Science and Mathematics, 117(5), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12224

Wells, J., Henderson, R., Traxler, A., Miller, P., & Stewart, J. (2020). Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the force and motion conceptual evaluation with modified module analysis. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVPHYSEDUCRES.16.010121

Yazan, B., & De Vasconcelos, I. C. O. (2016). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. Meta: Avaliacao, 8(22), 149–182. https://doi.org/10.22347/2175-2753v8i22.1038

Zb, A., Novalian, D., Ananda, R., Habibi, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). Distance learning with steam approacheS: Is Effect On The Cognitive Domain? Jurnal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies, 6(2), 129–140.

Zb, A., Novalian, D., Rozal, E., Sulman, F., & Habibi, M. (2021). STEM approach in online lectures: how does it contribute to cognitive aspects? Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 5(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v5i2.4365

Zb, A., Setiawan, M. E., Rozal, E., & Sulman, F. (2021). Investigating hybrid learning strategies: does it affect creativity? Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(4), 868–875. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i4.4063

Zb, A., Setiawan, M. E., & Sulman, F. (2020). Pengaruh e-learning berbasis schoology berbantuan whatsapp group terhadap hasil belajar ditengah pandemi covid-19. Al-Khidmah, 3(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.29406/al-khidmah.v3i2.2282

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i3.13182