Characteristics of Students’ Cognitive Ability on the Hyperopia Concept: Rasch Analysis

Isnaini Agus Setiono; Anggraining Widiningtyas

doi:10.20527/bipf.v11i2.15492

Characteristics of Students’ Cognitive Ability on the Hyperopia Concept: Rasch Analysis

Isnaini Agus Setiono, Anggraining Widiningtyas

Abstract

Knowing the characteristics of students' cognitive abilities is very useful for designing appropriate learning so that students can achieve holistic cognitive abilities. This study aimed to analyze the characteristics of students' cognitive abilities on the hyperopia concept. Rasch analysis includes person and item analysis, which is used to analyze the characteristics of students' cognitive abilities. The research subjects were 64 K-10 students consisting of 38 female students and 26 male students at a public high school in West Bandung Regency. The instrument used to identify students' cognitive abilities on the hyperopia concept is an essay test consisting of 6 items from levels C1-C6 according to the revised Bloom's taxonomy. The results show that the student's cognitive abilities at the level of remembering (100%), understanding (94%), and applying (91%) are in the very good category. Meanwhile, the cognitive abilities at the analyzing, evaluating, and creating levels were below the average cognitive abilities of the students (logit value 0.79). The cognitive ability of female students at the analyzing level is significantly higher than that of male students. The results of this study can be used as an assessment to develop learning activities.

Keywords

Cognitive Ability; Hyperopia; Rasch Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ainiyah, Q., Yuliati, L., & Parno, P. (2020). Analisis penguasaan konsep dan kesulitan belajar materi alat-alat optik pada siswa kelas xi man tuban. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 24–29.

Anantanukulwong, R., Chiangga, S., Pongsophon, P., & Tan, A.-L. (2022). Enhancing students’ learning of the concept of equilibrium through a culturally responsive inquiry of the bulan kite. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00398-0

Basori, H., Suhandi, A., Kaniawati, I., & Rusdiana, D. (2020). Concept progression of high school students related to the concept of parallel electric circuits as the effect of applying CCROI integrated with T-ZPD strategy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2), 022009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022009

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4

Bradley, K. D., Peabody, M. R., Akers, K. S., & Knutson, N. M. (2015). Rating scales in survey research: Using the rasch model to illustrate the middle category measurement flaw. Survey Practice, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2015-0001

Brendefur, J. L., Johnson, E. S., Thiede, K. W., Strother, S., & Severson, H. H. (2018). Developing a multi-dimensional early elementary mathematics screener and diagnostic tool: the primary mathematics assessment. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(2), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0854-x

Chan, S.-W., Looi, C.-K., & Sumintono, B. (2021). Assessing computational thinking abilities among Singapore secondary students: A Rasch model measurement analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00177-2

Chin, H., Chew, C. M., Yew, W., & Musa, M. (2022). Validating the cognitive diagnostic assessment and assessing students’ mastery of ‘parallel and perpendicular lines’ using the rasch model. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 436–452.

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.147.9.6

Dalila, A. A., Rahmah, S., Liliawati, W., & Kaniawati, I. (2022). Effect of differentiated learning in problem based learning on cognitive learning outcomes of high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2116–2122. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1839

Ene, E., & Ackerson, B. J. (2018). Assessing learning in small sized physics courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010102

Engelhard, G. (2013). Invariant measurement, using rasch models in the social, behavioral, and health sciences (1st ed.). Routledge.

Fajrina, R. N. A. A., Handayanto, S. K., & Hidayat, A. (2016). Deskripsi penguasaan konsep siswa terhadap materi fluida statis di tana paser kalimantan timur. Pros. Semnas Pend IPA Pascasarjana UM, 1, 416–422. https://pasca.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Rani-Nur-416-422.pdf

Fatmawati, S. (2013). Perumusan Tujuan pembelajaran dan soal kognitif berorientasi pada revisi taksonomi bloom dalam pembelajaran fisika. EduSains, 1(2). https://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/edusains/article/view/13

Furqani, D., Feranie, S., & Winarno, N. (2018). The effect of predict-observe-explain (poe) strategy on students’ conceptual mastery and critical thinking in learning vibration and wave. Journal of Science Learning, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i1.12879

Gómez-Varela, A. I., Salvado-Vara, F., & Bao-Varela, C. (2014). A teaching resource using the GUIDE environment: Simplified model of the eye for secondary school students (M. F. P. C. Martins Costa & M. Zghal, Eds.; p. 928920). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2070766

Hançer, A. H., & Durkan, N. (2008). Turkish pupils understanding of physical concept: Force and movement. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(1), 45–50.

Hardianti, T. (2018). Analisis kemampuan peserta didik pada ranah kognitif dalam pembelajaran fisika sma. Seminar Nasional Quantum. Seminar Nasional Quantum #25, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. seminar.uad.ac.id/index.php/quantum

Hermita, N., Suhandi, A., Syaodih, E., Samsudin, A., Marhadi, H., Sapriadil, S., Zaenudin, Z., Rochman, C., Mansur, M., & Wibowo, F. C. (2018). Level conceptual change pre-service elementary teachers on electric current conceptions through visual multimedia supported conceptual change. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 012060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012060

Isa, N. M., & Naim, H. A. (2016). Science process skill assessment: teachers practice and competency. In Q. Zhang (Ed.), Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2015 Conference Proceedings (pp. 251–266). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1687-5_16

Jatmiko, B., Widodo, W., Martini, M., Budiyanto, M., Wicaksono, I., & Pandiangan, P. (2016). Effectiveness of the inqf-based learning on a general physics for improving student’s learning outcomes. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.441

Johan, H., Suhandi, A., Wulan, A. R., Sapriyadi, & Herawati, A. (2018). Enhancing mastery of earth science concept of prospective physics teachers through interactive conceptual instruction supported by visualization and grads. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.9799

Jones, D. L., & Zollman, D. (2014). Understanding vision: Students’ use of light and optics resources. European Journal of Physics, 35(5), 055023. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/35/5/055023

Kaniawati, I. (2017). Pengaruh simulasi komputer terhadap peningkatan penguasaan konsep impuls-momentum siswa sma. Jurnal Pembelajaran Sains, 1(1), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.17977/um033v1i1p24-26

Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest: Physics Teachers’ Knowledge and Motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586–614. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21378

Khine, M. S. (Ed.). (2020). Rasch measurement: Applications in quantitative educational research. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1800-3

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Lamanepa, G. H. (2021). Metode pengukuran rasch dalam pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Eduscience, 8(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v8i1.1975

Lavrijsen, J., Preckel, F., Verachtert, P., Vansteenkiste, M., & Verschueren, K. (2021). Are motivational benefits of adequately challenging schoolwork related to students’ need for cognition, cognitive ability, or both? Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110558

Ling, T. W. (2017). Fostering understanding and reducing misconceptions about image formation by a plane mirror using constructivist-based hands-on activities. In M. Karpudewan, A. N. Md

Zain, & A. L. Chandrasegaran (Eds.), Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions in Science (pp. 203–222). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3437-4_11

Liu, X. (2010). Using and developing measurement instruments in science education: A rasch modeling approach. Science & Engineering Education Sources. IAP - Information Age Publishing, Inc.

Mahtari, S., Misbah, M., & Suryati, S. (2019). Analysis of the ability of High school students in solving science literacy questions based on the rasch model. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 2(1), 11-16.

https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v2i1.61

Millán, M. S., Pérez-Cabré, E., Romero, L. A., & Ramírez, N. (2014). Programmable diffractive lens for ophthalmic application. Optical Engineering, 53(6), 061709. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.53.6.061709

Nurhayati, N., & Angraeni, L. (2017). Analisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi mahasiswa (higher order thinking) dalam menyelesaikan soal konsep optika melalui model problem based learning. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03201

Paraboni, A. L., & da Costa, N. (2021). Improving the level of financial literacy and the influence of the cognitive ability in this process. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90, 101656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101656

Prasetyani, E., Hartono, Y., & Susanti, E. (2016). Kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa kelas xi dalam pembelajaran trigonometri berbasis masalah di sma negeri 18 palembang. Jurnal Gantang, 1(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v1i1.4

Rijke, W. J., Bollen, L., Eysink, T. H. S., & Tolboom, J. L. J. (2018). Computational thinking in primary school: An examination of abstraction and decomposition in different age groups. Informatics in Education, 17(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2018.05

Risdianto, E., Darmawan, A., Kristiawan, M., Wachidi, & Riyanto. (2020). Rasch model analysis on the feasibility test of basic physics ii practical guide using augmented reality. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 15(4), 482–490.

Rukmini, E. (2008). Deskripsi singkat revisi taksonomi bloom. Majalah Ilmiah Pembelajaran, 2. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/mip/article/view/7132

Saidfudin, M., Azrilah, A. A., Rodzo’an, N. A., Omar, M. Z., Zaharim, A., & Basri, H. (2010). Easier learning outcomes analysis using rasch model in engineering education research. Latest Trends on Engineering Education, 442–447. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Easier-learning-outcomes-

analysis-using-Rasch-model-Saidfudin-

Azrilah/b36f39a8b1bba3a6f59d9a1115b70b1a91623c57

Setiono, I. A., Suhandi, A., & Liliawati, W. (2021). Conceptual progression of K-10 student on the free-falling objects acceleration concept as an effect of E-CDCCText. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012026

Setyorini, A., Yamtinah, S., Mahardiani, L., & Saputro, S. (2021). A rasch analysis of item quality of the chemical literacy assessment for investigating student’s chemical literacy on chemical rate concepts. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1769–1779. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1769

Sianturi, S., & Gultom, T. (2016). Analisis kesulitan belajar dan hubungannya dengan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran biologi siswa kelas x di sma negeri 1 sidikalang tahun pembelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 4(1), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v4i1.3694

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan [Application of rasch modelling in educational measurement]. Trimkom Publishing House.

Suranti, N. M. Y., Gunawan, G., & Sahidu, H. (2017). Pengaruh model project based learning berbantuan media virtual terhadap penguasaan konsep peserta didik pada materi alat-alat optik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 2(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v2i2.292

Ubaidillah, M., Marwoto, P., Wiyanto, W., Rusilowati, A., Subali, B., Mindyarto, B., & Isnarni, W. (2022). Development of habits of mind instruments in the context of basic physics practicum: EFA and Rasch Model. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 26, 1. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2022-026-ubai

Wandari, G. A., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Agustin, R. R. (2018). The Effect of STEAM-based learning on students’ concept mastery and creativity in learning light and optics. Journal of Science Learning, 2(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i1.12878

Wati, M., Mahtari, S., Hartini, S., & Amelia, H. (2019). A rasch model analysis on junior high school students’ scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 13(07), 141. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i07.10760

Wicaksono, A. G. C. (2016). Perbandingan kemampuan kognitif dan metakognitif mahasiswa dengan gaya belajar yang berbeda. Media Peneitian Pendidikan, 10(2), 142–153.

Wicaksono, I., Wasis, W., & Madlazim, M. (2017). The effectiveness of virtual science teaching model (vs-tm) to improve student’s scientific creativity and concept mastery on senior high school physics subject. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(4), 549–561. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.549

Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). The development of two-tier multiple choice test to assess students’ conceptual understanding about light and optical instruments. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.16591

Winarti, W. (2015). Profil kemampuan berpikir analisis dan evaluasi mahasiswa dalam mengerjakan soal Konsep Kalor. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(1), 19–24.

Xie, Q., Zhong, X., Wang, W.-C., & Lim, C. P. (2014). Development of an item bank for assessing generic competences in a higher-education institute: A Rasch modelling approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863847

Yusuf, I., & Widyaningsih, S. W. (2020). Implementing e-learning-based virtual laboratory media to students’ metacognitive skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(05), 63. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i05.12029

Yusuf, I., Widyaningsih, S. W., & Sebayang, S. R. B. (2018). Implementation of e-learning based-stem on quantum physics subject to student hots ability. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10258a)

Zoechling, S., Hopf, M., Woithe, J., & Schmeling, S. (2022). Students’ interest in particle physics: Conceptualisation, instrument development, and evaluation using Rasch theory and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 44(15), 2353–2380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2122897

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v11i2.15492