Developing a Multi-Representation-Based Physics Mobile Learning to Enhance Critical Thinking and Creative Problem-Solving Skills: A Storyboard
Abstract
This investigation aims to develop an M-Learning-based learning design for high school pupils in the context of a soundwave lesson specifically to increase critical thinking (CT) skills and creative problem-solving (CPS) ability. This learning media design is created through the ADDIE process, comprising five stages: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. In this paper, we will elaborate on the analysis and design phases. The analysis phase involves a preliminary examination of the teaching materials necessary for mobile learning. The design stage also involves selecting the proposed prototype's overarching design and creating storyboards. Three of the five subchapters that have been developed have the potential to employ CPS features, while CT features are feasible to integrate into all chapters. These findings suggest that physics mobile learning can be designed to incorporate CT and CPS specifically in the lesson on soundwave.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315(99)00029-9
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Ainsworth, S. (2008). The Educational Value of Multiple-representations when Learning Complex Scientific Concepts. In Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_9
Alenezi, A. (2020). The role of e-learning materials in enhancing teaching and learning behaviors. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.1.1338
Amin, I., Sukestiyarno, Y., Waluya, S. B., & Mariani, S. (2020). Kualitas rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran (rpp) dan implementasinya dalam pembelajaran matematika sma. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v4i1.2914
Aprilia, T. (2021). Efektivitas penggunaan media sains flipbook berbasis kontekstual untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.32059
Bae, J. H., & Lee, H. (2017). Design and implementation of the mobile learning app for creative problem solving activities. In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (Vol. 421). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3023-9_121
Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2018). Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers and Education, 121, 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.006
Bologna, V., Leban, S. P., Longo, F., Peressi, M., & Sorzio, P. (2023). Implementing the use of energy bar charts in the framework of an early physics approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2490(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2490/1/012009
Bronkhorst, H., Roorda, G., Suhre, C., & Goedhart, M. (2020). Logical reasoning in formal and everyday reasoning tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10039-8
Camarata, S., Liu, X. L., Lee, W., Li, T., Jiang, F., & Simms, M. (2023). Adapting the UNICEF/WHO Nurturing Care Framework for speech-language pathologists to support Sustainable Development Goal 4. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(1), 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2022.2141327
Čančula, M. P., Planinšič, G., & Etkina, E. (2015). Analyzing patterns in experts’ approaches to solving experimental problems. American Journal of Physics, 83(4). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4913528
Chmielarz, W. (2020). The usage of smartphone and mobile applications from the point of view of customers in Poland. Information (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/INFO11040220
Closs, L., Mahat, M., & Imms, W. (2022). Learning environments’ influence on students’ learning experience in an Australian Faculty of Business and Economics. Learning Environments Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09361-2
Curum, B., & Khedo, K. K. (2021). Cognitive load management in mobile learning systems: principles and theories. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00173-6
Darimi, I. (2017). Teknologi informasi dan komunikasi sebagai media pembelajaran pendidikan agama islam efektif. Jurnal pendidikan teknologi informasi, 1(2), 111-121.
Dasilva, B. E., Ardiyati, T. K., Suparno, S., Sukardiyono, S., Eveline, E., Utami, T., & Ferty, Z. N. (2019). Development of android-based interactive physics mobile learning media (ipmlm) with scaffolding learning approach to improve hots of high school students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.610377
El-Sofany, H. F., & El-Haggar, N. (2020). The effectiveness of using mobile learning techniques to improve learning outcomes in higher education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V14I08.13125
Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018003004
Evans, J. R. (1997). Creativity in OR/MS: The creative problem-solving process, part 1. Interfaces, 27(5). https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.27.5.78
Facione, P. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
Fitriawan, D. (2022). The effect of online learning using online media on learning achievement. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v5i1.1546
Fuad, A. J. (2020). Method of discussion and learning styles towards student’s critical thinking ability. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 13(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v13i1.23592
Gawlik-Kobylińska, M., Kabashkin, I., Misnevs, B., & Maciejewski, P. (2023). Education mobility as a service: A study of the features of a novel mobility platform. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095245
Grant, M. M. (2019). Difficulties in defining mobile learning: analysis, design characteristics, and implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09641-4
Hadi, W., Yuksafa, R., Yarmi, G., Safitri, D., Lestari, I., Suntari, Y., Umasih, Marini, A., Sudrajat, A., & Iskandar, R. (2022). Enhancement of students’ learning outcomes through interactive multimedia. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i07.25825
Husna, M., & Kuswanto, H. (2018). Development of physics mobile learning based on local wisdom to improve vector and diagram representation abilities. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i6.8746
Isaksen, S. G. (2023). Developing creative potential: The power of process, people, and place. Journal of Advanced Academics, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X231156389
Jamil, M., Mehmood, W., & Noorani, Z. (2024). An analysis of physics textbook grade x for critical thinking skills development. Pakistan Journal Of Law, Analysis And Wisdom, 3(4), 39–47.
Kasidin, S. (2019). Berpikir kritis: Kecakapan hidup di era digital. Google Books.
Kemdikbud. (2022). Profil Pelajar Pancasila [Broadcast].
Kemendiknas. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 konsep dan penerapan. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Khotimah, K., Nyeneng, I. D. P., & Sesunan, F. (2017). Pengaruh kemampuan berpikir kritis dan respons bahan ajar multirepresentasi terhadap hasil belajar. Urnal Pembelajaran Fisika Universitas Lampung, 5(3).
Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, m-learning and d-learning: conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180
Lacka, E., Wong, T. C., & Haddoud, M. Y. (2021). Can digital technologies improve students’ efficiency? Exploring the role of virtual learning environment and social media use in higher education. Computers and Education, 163.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104099
Leisen, W., Opfermann, M., & Härtig, H. (2023). Perceiving the usage of external representations in physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13432
Lusiyana, A., Festiyed, F., & Yulkifli, Y. (2019). The problems of integrating multiple representation skills in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012035
MacQueeney, P., Lewis, E., Fulton, G., Surber, C., Newland, K., Hochstetler, E., & Tilak, S. (2022). Applying Piaget to classroom teaching: Stage development and social learning theory. The 2022 Whole University Catalogue.
Mar, G. R. (2021). Thinking matters: Critical thinking as creative problem solving. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/11712
Marunevich, O., Kolmakova, V., Odaruyk, I., & Shalkov, D. (2021). E-learning and m-learning as tools for enhancing teaching and learning in higher education: a case study of Russia. SHS Web of Conferences, 110. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111003007
McKendree, J., Small, C., Stenning, K., & Conlon, T. (2002). The role of representation in teaching and learning critical thinking. Educational Review, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910120110884
Mohd Abeden, N. A., & Siew, N. M. (2022). Assessing students’ critical thinking and physics problem-solving skills in secondary schools. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(6). https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i6.1584
Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. (2021). The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: what do we know and where do we go from here? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577
Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: an overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3).
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329
Nurhayati, N., Yuliati, L., & Mufti, N. (2016). Pola penalaran ilmiah dan kemampuan penyelesaian masalah sintesis fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(8).
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative problem solving (volume v). Programme for International Student Assessment.
OECD. (2018). PISA 2015 Results in Focus. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1596/28293
OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. conceptual learning framework. Comparative Education, 15 (2).
O’Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., & Lefrere, P. (2003). Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment. Mobilearn project deliverable, 2.
Ozdamli, F. (2012). Pedagogical framework of m-learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.171
Paivio, A. (2014). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Psychology press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315785233
Parnes, S. J. (1988). Visionizing. DOK Publishers.
Partono, P., Wardhani, H. N., Setyowati, N. I., Tsalitsa, A., & Putri, S. N. (2021). Strategi meningkatkan kompetensi 4c (critical thinking, creativity, communication, & collaborative). Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.35810
Permata, A. R., Muslim, M., & Suyana, I. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi momentum dan impuls. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal), 8, SNF2019-PE. https://doi.org/10.21009/03.snf2019.01.pe.02
Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 (2016).
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
Prahani, B. K., Jatmiko, B., Amelia, T., Arzak, K. A., Qotrunnada, N. A., & Neswary, S. B. A. (2023). Research profile of inquiry on physics learning during the covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.1889
Puspitaningrum, H. Z., Wasis, & Tjipto Prastowo. (2021). Development of multi-representation test as a solution to train high-order thinking skills high school students in newton’s law. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(1).
https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i1.76
Rachmawati, O. Q., Prahani, K. B., & Husni, M. (2022). Profile of Students’ Physics Problem-solving skills and implementation of quizizz-based team games tournament (qtgt) method in physics learning. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 7(1).
Rusticus, S. A., Pashootan, T., & Mah, A. (2023). What are the key elements of a positive learning environment? Perspectives from students and faculty. Learning Environments Research, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4
Saekawati, R., & Nasrudin, H. (2021). Effectiveness of guided inquiry-based on blended learning in improving critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.36947
Saputra, M. R. D., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). The effectiveness of physics mobile learning (pml) with hombobatu theme to improve the ability of diagram representation and critical thinking of senior high school students. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12230a
Sarsar, F., Kişla, T., Karasu, M., Arıkan, Y. D., & Kılıç, M. (2019). The usability of mobile devices in distance learning. In Managing and designing online courses in ubiquitous learning environments (pp. 262-278). IGI Global.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9779-7.ch014
Shete, D., & Khobragade, P. (2023). An empirical analysis of different data visualization techniques from statistical perspective. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2839(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0167670
Simanjuntak, M., Martgrita, M. M., Damanik, J. Y., & Pasaribu, M. (2022). The Relevance of learning methods in realising student-centred transformative learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(3).
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.3.19
Suhendi, A., Purwarno, P., & Chairani, S. (2021). Constructivism-based teaching and learning in indonesian education. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i4.8668
Sukmafani, A., Munzil, M., & Fitriyah, I. J. (2021). Development of teaching material with the creative problem solving model using mobile learning application. Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.17977/um072v2i22021p124-135
Susac, A., Planinic, M., Bubic, A., Jelicic, K., & Palmovic, M. (2023). Effect of representation format on conceptual question performance and eye-tracking measures. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020114
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., &
Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Tomkelski, M. L., Baptista, M., & Richit, A. (2023). Physics teachers’ learning on the use of multiple representations in lesson study about Ohm’s law. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12906
Tumanggor, A. M. R., Jumadi, J., Wilujeng, I., & Ringo, E. S. (2019). The profile of students’ physics problem solving ability in optical instruments. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05104
van Hooijdonk, M., Mainhard, T., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Tartwijk, J. (2020). Creative problem solving in primary education: Exploring the role of fact finding, problem finding, and solution finding across tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100665
Wongwatkit, C., Panjaburee, P., & Srisawasdi, N. (2017). A proposal to develop a guided-inquiry mobile learning with a mastery learning mechanism for improving students’ learning performance and attitudes in Physics. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(1), 63 – 86. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2017.080898
Yakar, U., Sülü, A., Porgali, M., & Çaliş, N. (2020). From constructivist educational technology to mobile constructivism: how mobile learning serves constructivism? International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.818487
Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. Globalisation and education reforms: Creating effective learning environments, 35-50.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
Zamil, M. R. R., Hariyono, E., & Prahani, B. K. (2021). Profile of implementation direct instruction and physics problem solving skills of senior high school students. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v5i3.3895
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v13i1.19689
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 114 timesPDF - 217 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed by:
The journal has been listed in:
Statistics Counter
1. From August 10, 2016 to present (broken code but the stats is still working)
2. From December 28, 2018 to present (updated stats)
Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License














