Developing a Multi-Representation-Based Physics Mobile Learning to Enhance Critical Thinking and Creative Problem-Solving Skills: A Storyboard

Sri Zakiyah, Irma Rahma Suwarma, Dadi Rusdiana

Abstract


This investigation aims to develop an M-Learning-based learning design for high school pupils in the context of a soundwave lesson specifically to increase critical thinking (CT) skills and creative problem-solving (CPS) ability. This learning media design is created through the ADDIE process, comprising five stages: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. In this paper, we will elaborate on the analysis and design phases. The analysis phase involves a preliminary examination of the teaching materials necessary for mobile learning. The design stage also involves selecting the proposed prototype's overarching design and creating storyboards. Three of the five subchapters that have been developed have the potential to employ CPS features, while CT features are feasible to integrate into all chapters. These findings suggest that physics mobile learning can be designed to incorporate CT and CPS specifically in the lesson on soundwave.


Keywords


Creative problem-solving; Critical thinking; Physics mobile learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315(99)00029-9

Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001

Ainsworth, S. (2008). The Educational Value of Multiple-representations when Learning Complex Scientific Concepts. In Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_9

Alenezi, A. (2020). The role of e-learning materials in enhancing teaching and learning behaviors. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.1.1338

Amin, I., Sukestiyarno, Y., Waluya, S. B., & Mariani, S. (2020). Kualitas rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran (rpp) dan implementasinya dalam pembelajaran matematika sma. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v4i1.2914

Aprilia, T. (2021). Efektivitas penggunaan media sains flipbook berbasis kontekstual untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.32059

Bae, J. H., & Lee, H. (2017). Design and implementation of the mobile learning app for creative problem solving activities. In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (Vol. 421). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3023-9_121

Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2018). Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers and Education, 121, 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.006

Bologna, V., Leban, S. P., Longo, F., Peressi, M., & Sorzio, P. (2023). Implementing the use of energy bar charts in the framework of an early physics approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2490(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2490/1/012009

Bronkhorst, H., Roorda, G., Suhre, C., & Goedhart, M. (2020). Logical reasoning in formal and everyday reasoning tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10039-8

Camarata, S., Liu, X. L., Lee, W., Li, T., Jiang, F., & Simms, M. (2023). Adapting the UNICEF/WHO Nurturing Care Framework for speech-language pathologists to support Sustainable Development Goal 4. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(1), 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2022.2141327

Čančula, M. P., Planinšič, G., & Etkina, E. (2015). Analyzing patterns in experts’ approaches to solving experimental problems. American Journal of Physics, 83(4). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4913528

Chmielarz, W. (2020). The usage of smartphone and mobile applications from the point of view of customers in Poland. Information (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/INFO11040220

Closs, L., Mahat, M., & Imms, W. (2022). Learning environments’ influence on students’ learning experience in an Australian Faculty of Business and Economics. Learning Environments Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09361-2

Curum, B., & Khedo, K. K. (2021). Cognitive load management in mobile learning systems: principles and theories. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00173-6

Darimi, I. (2017). Teknologi informasi dan komunikasi sebagai media pembelajaran pendidikan agama islam efektif. Jurnal pendidikan teknologi informasi, 1(2), 111-121.

Dasilva, B. E., Ardiyati, T. K., Suparno, S., Sukardiyono, S., Eveline, E., Utami, T., & Ferty, Z. N. (2019). Development of android-based interactive physics mobile learning media (ipmlm) with scaffolding learning approach to improve hots of high school students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.610377

El-Sofany, H. F., & El-Haggar, N. (2020). The effectiveness of using mobile learning techniques to improve learning outcomes in higher education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V14I08.13125

Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018003004

Evans, J. R. (1997). Creativity in OR/MS: The creative problem-solving process, part 1. Interfaces, 27(5). https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.27.5.78

Facione, P. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.

Fitriawan, D. (2022). The effect of online learning using online media on learning achievement. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v5i1.1546

Fuad, A. J. (2020). Method of discussion and learning styles towards student’s critical thinking ability. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 13(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v13i1.23592

Gawlik-Kobylińska, M., Kabashkin, I., Misnevs, B., & Maciejewski, P. (2023). Education mobility as a service: A study of the features of a novel mobility platform. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095245

Grant, M. M. (2019). Difficulties in defining mobile learning: analysis, design characteristics, and implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09641-4

Hadi, W., Yuksafa, R., Yarmi, G., Safitri, D., Lestari, I., Suntari, Y., Umasih, Marini, A., Sudrajat, A., & Iskandar, R. (2022). Enhancement of students’ learning outcomes through interactive multimedia. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i07.25825

Husna, M., & Kuswanto, H. (2018). Development of physics mobile learning based on local wisdom to improve vector and diagram representation abilities. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i6.8746

Isaksen, S. G. (2023). Developing creative potential: The power of process, people, and place. Journal of Advanced Academics, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X231156389

Jamil, M., Mehmood, W., & Noorani, Z. (2024). An analysis of physics textbook grade x for critical thinking skills development. Pakistan Journal Of Law, Analysis And Wisdom, 3(4), 39–47.

Kasidin, S. (2019). Berpikir kritis: Kecakapan hidup di era digital. Google Books.

Kemdikbud. (2022). Profil Pelajar Pancasila [Broadcast].

Kemendiknas. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 konsep dan penerapan. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Khotimah, K., Nyeneng, I. D. P., & Sesunan, F. (2017). Pengaruh kemampuan berpikir kritis dan respons bahan ajar multirepresentasi terhadap hasil belajar. Urnal Pembelajaran Fisika Universitas Lampung, 5(3).

Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, m-learning and d-learning: conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180

Lacka, E., Wong, T. C., & Haddoud, M. Y. (2021). Can digital technologies improve students’ efficiency? Exploring the role of virtual learning environment and social media use in higher education. Computers and Education, 163.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104099

Leisen, W., Opfermann, M., & Härtig, H. (2023). Perceiving the usage of external representations in physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13432

Lusiyana, A., Festiyed, F., & Yulkifli, Y. (2019). The problems of integrating multiple representation skills in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012035

MacQueeney, P., Lewis, E., Fulton, G., Surber, C., Newland, K., Hochstetler, E., & Tilak, S. (2022). Applying Piaget to classroom teaching: Stage development and social learning theory. The 2022 Whole University Catalogue.

Mar, G. R. (2021). Thinking matters: Critical thinking as creative problem solving. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/11712

Marunevich, O., Kolmakova, V., Odaruyk, I., & Shalkov, D. (2021). E-learning and m-learning as tools for enhancing teaching and learning in higher education: a case study of Russia. SHS Web of Conferences, 110. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111003007

McKendree, J., Small, C., Stenning, K., & Conlon, T. (2002). The role of representation in teaching and learning critical thinking. Educational Review, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910120110884

Mohd Abeden, N. A., & Siew, N. M. (2022). Assessing students’ critical thinking and physics problem-solving skills in secondary schools. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(6). https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i6.1584

Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. (2021). The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: what do we know and where do we go from here? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577

Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: an overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3).

https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329

Nurhayati, N., Yuliati, L., & Mufti, N. (2016). Pola penalaran ilmiah dan kemampuan penyelesaian masalah sintesis fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(8).

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative problem solving (volume v). Programme for International Student Assessment.

OECD. (2018). PISA 2015 Results in Focus. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1596/28293

OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. conceptual learning framework. Comparative Education, 15 (2).

O’Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., & Lefrere, P. (2003). Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment. Mobilearn project deliverable, 2.

Ozdamli, F. (2012). Pedagogical framework of m-learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.171

Paivio, A. (2014). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Psychology press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315785233

Parnes, S. J. (1988). Visionizing. DOK Publishers.

Partono, P., Wardhani, H. N., Setyowati, N. I., Tsalitsa, A., & Putri, S. N. (2021). Strategi meningkatkan kompetensi 4c (critical thinking, creativity, communication, & collaborative). Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.35810

Permata, A. R., Muslim, M., & Suyana, I. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi momentum dan impuls. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal), 8, SNF2019-PE. https://doi.org/10.21009/03.snf2019.01.pe.02

Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 (2016).

Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306

Prahani, B. K., Jatmiko, B., Amelia, T., Arzak, K. A., Qotrunnada, N. A., & Neswary, S. B. A. (2023). Research profile of inquiry on physics learning during the covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.1889

Puspitaningrum, H. Z., Wasis, & Tjipto Prastowo. (2021). Development of multi-representation test as a solution to train high-order thinking skills high school students in newton’s law. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(1).

https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i1.76

Rachmawati, O. Q., Prahani, K. B., & Husni, M. (2022). Profile of Students’ Physics Problem-solving skills and implementation of quizizz-based team games tournament (qtgt) method in physics learning. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 7(1).

Rusticus, S. A., Pashootan, T., & Mah, A. (2023). What are the key elements of a positive learning environment? Perspectives from students and faculty. Learning Environments Research, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4

Saekawati, R., & Nasrudin, H. (2021). Effectiveness of guided inquiry-based on blended learning in improving critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.36947

Saputra, M. R. D., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). The effectiveness of physics mobile learning (pml) with hombobatu theme to improve the ability of diagram representation and critical thinking of senior high school students. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12230a

Sarsar, F., Kişla, T., Karasu, M., Arıkan, Y. D., & Kılıç, M. (2019). The usability of mobile devices in distance learning. In Managing and designing online courses in ubiquitous learning environments (pp. 262-278). IGI Global.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9779-7.ch014

Shete, D., & Khobragade, P. (2023). An empirical analysis of different data visualization techniques from statistical perspective. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2839(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0167670

Simanjuntak, M., Martgrita, M. M., Damanik, J. Y., & Pasaribu, M. (2022). The Relevance of learning methods in realising student-centred transformative learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(3).

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.3.19

Suhendi, A., Purwarno, P., & Chairani, S. (2021). Constructivism-based teaching and learning in indonesian education. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i4.8668

Sukmafani, A., Munzil, M., & Fitriyah, I. J. (2021). Development of teaching material with the creative problem solving model using mobile learning application. Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.17977/um072v2i22021p124-135

Susac, A., Planinic, M., Bubic, A., Jelicic, K., & Palmovic, M. (2023). Effect of representation format on conceptual question performance and eye-tracking measures. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020114

Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., &

Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054

Tomkelski, M. L., Baptista, M., & Richit, A. (2023). Physics teachers’ learning on the use of multiple representations in lesson study about Ohm’s law. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12906

Tumanggor, A. M. R., Jumadi, J., Wilujeng, I., & Ringo, E. S. (2019). The profile of students’ physics problem solving ability in optical instruments. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05104

van Hooijdonk, M., Mainhard, T., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Tartwijk, J. (2020). Creative problem solving in primary education: Exploring the role of fact finding, problem finding, and solution finding across tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100665

Wongwatkit, C., Panjaburee, P., & Srisawasdi, N. (2017). A proposal to develop a guided-inquiry mobile learning with a mastery learning mechanism for improving students’ learning performance and attitudes in Physics. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(1), 63 – 86. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2017.080898

Yakar, U., Sülü, A., Porgali, M., & Çaliş, N. (2020). From constructivist educational technology to mobile constructivism: how mobile learning serves constructivism? International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.818487

Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. Globalisation and education reforms: Creating effective learning environments, 35-50.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3

Zamil, M. R. R., Hariyono, E., & Prahani, B. K. (2021). Profile of implementation direct instruction and physics problem solving skills of senior high school students. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v5i3.3895




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v13i1.19689

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 114 times
PDF - 217 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

     

The journal has been listed in:

 

Statistics Counter

1. From August 10, 2016 to present (broken code but the stats is still working)

 joomla
visitor View My Stats

2. From December 28, 2018 to present (updated stats)

View My Stats

Flag Counter

Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan fisika is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License