The Development of A Physics Teaching Module Using Multimodel to Improve Students' Understanding of Concepts

Nor Anisa; Sarah Miriam; Abdul Salam

doi:10.20527/bipf.v13i3.23146

The Development of A Physics Teaching Module Using Multimodel to Improve Students' Understanding of Concepts

Nor Anisa, Sarah Miriam, Abdul Salam

Abstract

Conceptual understanding is a fundamental component that students must possess in science learning. However, various studies have shown that students' conceptual understanding is still not taught optimally. The availability of teaching modules, supported by appropriate instructional models, can contribute significantly to improving students’ conceptual understanding. This study aims to develop a physics teaching module on the topic of momentum and impulse using a multimodel approach that is valid, practical, and effective in enhancing students’ conceptual understanding. This research employed a Research and Development (R&D) design using the ADDIE model. The research subjects consisted of 21 students from Class XI at an SMA in Amuntai City. The instruments used included a module validation sheet, an observation sheet for learning implementation, and a learning outcome test. The results showed that the developed teaching module demonstrated a very high level of validity with an average score of 3.37. The module, which includes learning materials, student worksheets, and a learning outcome test, was also categorized as highly valid. Observations of the module implementation over three meetings indicated a very good level of practicality. Moreover, the module was considered effective based on an n-gain score of 0.60. Therefore, the multimodel-based physics teaching module developed in this study is feasible for use in improving students' conceptual understanding in physics learning. This finding implies that the development of teaching modules using multimodal approaches can be a potential alternative strategy for educators to enhance students' understanding of concepts and make learning more meaningful.

Keywords

Concept understanding; Momentum impulse; Multimodel; Teaching module

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anggraena Y., Ginanto, D., Felicia, N., Andiarti, A., Herutami, I., Alhapip, L., Iswoyo, S., Hartini, Y., & Mahardika, R.L. (2022). Pembelajaran dan asesmen kurikulum. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Arends, R. (2008). Learning to teach: Belajar untuk mengajar edisi ketujuh. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Aulia, D. (2019). Refleksi dalam berfikir kritis: Proses dan pentingnya latihan terus-menerus. Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(3), 45-50.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.

Churchill, D. (2017). Digital resources for learning (1st ed.). Singapore: Springer.

Dewi, S. Z., & Ibrahim, H. T. (2019). Pentingnya pemahaman konsep untuk mengatasi miskonsepsi dalam materi belajar ipa di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Garut, 13, 130–136.

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119

Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate student’s understanding of electromagnetism concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(2), 243–279.

Fautin, S., Dewantara, D., & M., A. S. (2021). Pengembangan bahan ajar fisika berbasis multimodel pada topik teori kinetik gas. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 4(3), 111. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v4i3.2057

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology succes story: social interdepence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.

Loliyana, N., Sukamto, G. M., & Andayani, E. S. (2019). Pengaruh model outdoor learning terhadap pemahaman sejarah mahasiswa pendidikan sejarah. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(6):803. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i6.12536

Maria, H. T. (2012). Implementasi pembelajaran multimodel berbasis pendekatan kontekstual untuk meningkatkan pencapaian kompetensi dasar fisika di SLTP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 1(2), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.26418 /jpmipa.v1i2.198

Maulidina, S., & Bhakti, Y. B. (2020). Pengaruh media pembelajaran online dalam pemahaman dan minat belajar siswa pada konsep pelajaran fisika. ORBITA: Jurnal Hasil Kajian, Inovasi, dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2),248. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v6i2.2592

McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 755–767. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19122

Nasution, D. F., & Rasyidah, R. (2022). Development of problem based learning student worksheets on human digestive system materials to increase students learning outcome. BIO-INOVED : Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 4(2), 207.

https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v4i2.13489

Nieveen, N. (1999). Designing developmental research. Retrieved from https://www.slo.nl/en/sector/education/research

Nisa, R., Zainuddin, & Suriasa. (2014). Penerapan tipe learning cycle melalui model pengajaran langsung untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v2i2.843

Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. SLO.

Radiusman, R. (2020). Studi Literasi: Pemahaman konsep anak pada pembelajaran matematika. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.6.1.1-8

Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching physics with the physics suite. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527617294

Reigeluth, C. M. (2013). Instructional-design theories and models: An

overview of their current status. Routledge.

Riwanto, D., Azis, A., & Arafah, K. (2019). Analisis pemahaman konsep peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal fisika kelas X MIA SMA Negeri 3 Soppeng. Jurnal Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika (JSPF), 3(1), 23–31.

Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–39.

Rusiati, R., Zainuddin, Z., & Salam, A. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif pada materi suhu dan kalor di smk farmasi isfi banjarmasin. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 3(3).

Safputri, E. I., Zainuddin, & Mastuang. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika pada materi ajar usaha dan energi dengan metode problem posing dalam setting model pengajaran langsung pada siswa kelas XI SMAN 4 Banjarmasin. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 4.

Sanjaya, W. (2009). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Jakarta: Kencana.

Selvizia, N., Zainuddin, Z., & Salam, A. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berorientasi kecerdasan logis-matematis pada pokok bahasan impuls dan momentum dengan menggunakan model direct instruction di SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Banjarmasin. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika.

Shidik, M. A. (2020). Pemahaman konsep fisika peserta didik MAN Baraka. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 3(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.2.91.98

Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021

Suendarti, M., & Liberna, H. (2021). Analisis pemahaman konsep perbandingan trigonometri pada siswa SMA. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i2.7581

Sulisworo, D., Nursulistiyo, E., & Artha K, D. (2018). Panduan Pelatihan Mobile Cooperative Learning. Deepublish.

Syaemar, L. (2021). Upaya peningkatan minat dan hasil belajar fisika siswa kelas XII melalui media pembelajaran animasi 3 dimensi tahun pelajaran 2018/2019. SCIENCE: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 1(2), 76-170. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v1i2.522

Widoyoko, E. P. (2012). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wieman, C., & Perkins, K. (2005). Transforming physics education. Physics Today, 58(11), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2155756

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v13i3.23146