Integrated Temperature and Heat Teaching Module for Pancasila Student Profiles to Improve Learning Outcomes
Abstract
Physics learning in the Merdeka Curriculum still faces challenges in achieving 21st-century competencies. In many classrooms, the learning process remains dominated by lectures and formula memorization, limiting students’ opportunities to explore concepts, conduct experiments, and develop problem-solving skills. Moreover, the integration of Pancasila Student Profile values—particularly critical thinking, faithfulness and devotion to God Almighty, and collaboration—has not been clearly reflected in the available teaching materials. This gap indicates the need to develop a module that not only presents content but also encourages students to actively construct understanding through a guided inquiry approach. This study developed a heat and temperature learning module designed to address this gap. The development followed the ADDIE model and was tested on 30 high school students in Banjarmasin through expert validation, implementation observations, and learning achievement tests. The findings show that the module meets the criteria of validity, practicality, and effectiveness, with a cognitive N-Gain score of 0.47 (medium category). Thus, this module is feasible to be used as an alternative teaching material that supports more active and contextual physics learning in line with the direction of the Merdeka Curriculum. The implications of this study indicate that the integration of Pancasila Student Profile values into physics teaching modules not only contributes to improving students’ conceptual understanding but also provides a foundation for strengthening character development, such as critical reasoning, mutual cooperation, and faith-based attitudes within the learning process. Furthermore, the findings of this study can serve as a reference for teachers and instructional material developers in designing similar learning modules for other physics topics, as well as encouraging schools to implement instructional tools that align with Merdeka Curriculum policies and the reinforcement of 21st-century competencies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbar, R. A. (2023). Critical thinking as a twenty first century skill. Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences Review (JERSSR), 3(1), 8-15.
Aldilla, R., & Usmeldi. (2024). Development of physics e-modules based on guided inquiry. JPPIPA, 10(2), 112–120.
Atika, N., Sari, I. P., & Rahmawati, N. (2022). Efektivitas model inkuiri terbimbing dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 10(1), 115–123.
Bao, L. (2020). Learning outcomes in physics education research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020101.
Batubara, H. H. (2021). Efektivitas pembelajaran inkuiri dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 45–53.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York, NY: Springer.
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2016). Twenty-first century skills and global education roadmaps. In 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice (pp. 17-32). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Darllis, M., Yuliana, & Hartono, R. (2020). Analisis kepraktisan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 144–152.
Elvanisi, A., Rahman, R., & Hidayat, A. (2025). Guided inquiry model to improve scientific process skills. International Journal of Science Education, 47(3), 221–234.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Handayani, D., Puspitasari, L., & Nugraha, S. (2020). Pendidikan abad 21: Keterampilan berpikir kritis dan karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 10(1), 12–22.
Hasanah, U., Gunawan, & Muntari. (2025). Validity and practicality of physics learning tools. European Research Journal, 5(1), 20–30.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Pedoman implementasi. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Khairunnisa, F., et al. (2020). Effectiveness of inquiry learning in physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 90–98.
Lina, N., & Desnita. (2022). Valid and reliable physics test instruments. JPPPF, 8(2), 89–98.
Meliana, S., Hartati, & Suryadi. (2022). Pengembangan modul ajar fisika berbasis kontekstual. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 18(3), 211–222.
Nurhasanah, A., Yuliani, R., & Firmansyah, A. (2022). Lembar kerja peserta didik berbasis inkuiri untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 89–97.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do (Volume I). OECD Publishing.
Pramesti, D., Sari, R., & Lestari, H. (2020). Students’ difficulties in drawing conclusions. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 9(2), 155–162.
Prastowo, A. (2015). Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif. Diva Press.
Puspitasari, R., & Sari, D. (2022). Assessment of critical thinking in physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 18(2), 101–110.
Rahmat, A., Firdaus, & Lestari, D. (2023). Modul ajar berbasis kontekstual untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 11(2), 130–141.
Riduwan. (2015). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rizalia, R., Rukayah, & Handayani, T. (2021). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen tes hasil belajar fisika. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 12(2), 67–75.
Rizqiyani, F., Lestari, S., & Pratiwi, H. (2022). Analisis kepraktisan modul ajar berbasis inkuiri pada pembelajaran sains. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 421–430.
Sanaky, H. A. (2021). Media pembelajaran interaktif-inovatif. Yogyakarta: Kaukaba Dipantara.
Sefrina, A., Rahmawati, N., & Hidayat, A. (2023). Inquiry learning challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 45(6), 789–802.
Shaliha, N., Mastuang, & Haryandi, S. (2024). Validity of inquiry-based physics modules. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 45–55.
Sugiyono, S. (2016). Metode penelitian dan pengembangan (Research and Development/R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, S. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukma, A., Desnita, & Kurniawan, W. (2025). Physics module development with inquiry approach. Journal of Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–10.
Tan, J. P. L., Choo, S. S., Kang, T., & Liem, G. A. D. (2017). Educating for twenty-first century competencies and future-ready learners: research perspectives from Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 425-436.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of a knowledge based examination using Rasch analysis: An illustrative guide: AMEE Guide No. 72. Medical teacher, 35(1), e838-e848.
Wati, R., Kurniawan, D., & Putri, N. (2021). Efektivitas penggunaan model inkuiri terbimbing dalam pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains, 8(1), 33–42.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2016). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Yuliani, R., Nurhasanah, A., & Firmansyah, A. (2023). Inquiry-based learning and character development. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(3), 233–241.
Zaini, H. (2015). Model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains, 4(2), 98–106.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v14i2.24990
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 62 timesPDF - 41 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed by:
The journal has been listed in:
Statistics Counter
1. From August 10, 2016 to present (broken code but the stats is still working)
2. From December 28, 2018 to present (updated stats)
Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License














