Perubahan Pola Berpikir Mahasiswa  Pada Fenomena Perpindahan Panas Secara Konveksi

M. Dewi Manikta Puspitasari; Hisbulloh Ahlis Munawi

doi:10.20527/bipf.v6i2.4909

Perubahan Pola Berpikir Mahasiswa Pada Fenomena Perpindahan Panas Secara Konveksi

M. Dewi Manikta Puspitasari, Hisbulloh Ahlis Munawi

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilaksanakan untuk mengetahui perubahan pola berpikir mahasiswa setelah mengikuti kegiatan diskusi. Pola berpikir dalam penelitian digunakan siswa untuk menerapkan pengetahuan yang dimiliki untuk menyelesaikan fenomena kalor secara konveksi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan studi fenomenologi pola berpikir mahasiswa pada fenomena perpindahan panas secara konveksi. Konteks atau subjek penelitian merupakan mahasiswa yang mengikuti matakuliah Perpindahan Panas II. Data yang dikumpulkan bersifat deskriptif kualitatif, yaitu penjelasan secara aktual pola berpikir mahasiswa pada fenomena perpindahan panas secara konveksi. Instrumen penelitian berupa tes tertulis fenomena perpindahan panas secara konveksi. Teknik pengumpulan data diperoleh melalui tes sebelum kegiatan diskusi, observasi, wawancara, dan tes setelah kegiatan diskusi. Analisis data dilakukan mengikuti teknik analisis data kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat perubahan pola berpikir mahasiswa sebelum dan setelah diskusi dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan. Pola berpikir yang mengalami penurunan perkembangan adalah pola berpikir logis dan pola berpikir kritis.

The research aimed to determine the change in student ’s thinking pattern after following discussion activity. The thinking pattern was used by students to apply their ability for finishing the phenomenon of convection heat transfers. This research used qualitative approach be the phenomenological research method of student’s thinking pattern of convection heat transfer phenomenon. The qualitatively descriptive data were collected be the actual explanation of student’s thinking pattern of convection heat transfer phenomenon. The technic of collecting data was obtained by test before discussion activity, observation, interview and test after discussion. The data analysis followed the technic of the qualitative data analysis. The results showed that the change of student’s thinking pattern before and after discussion activity of problem-solving. The thinking pattern experienced the developed reduction of logical thinking and critical thinking patterns.

Keywords

pola berpikir; kegiatan diskusi; perpindahan panas.

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Alrfooh, A. (2014). Prevailing Patterns Thinking among Students of Tafila Technical University, Jordan. Journal of Education and Practise, 5(9).

Alwan, A. A. (2011). Misconception of Heat and Temperature among Physics Students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 600–614.

Azizmalayeri, K., Jafari, E. M., Sharif, M., Asgari, M., & Omidi, M. (2012). The Impact of Guided Inquiry Methods of Theaching on The Critical Thinking of High School Students. Journal of Education and Practise, 3(10), 42–48.

Bergner, Y., Kerr, D., & Pritchard, D. (2015). Methodological Challenges in the Analysis of MOOC Data for Exploring the Relationship between Discussion Forum Views and Learning Outcomes. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Educational Dat.

Bloom, J. W. (2010). Systems Thinking, Pattern Thinking, and Abductive Thinking as the Key Elements of Complex Learning. In Makalah disajikan pada the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Denver, Mey 2010.

Cengel, Y. (2008). Introduction to Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer Second Edition. USA: McGraw-Hill.

Choy, S. & Cheah, P. (2009). Teacher Perceptions of Critical Thinking among Students and its Influence on Higher Education. International Journal of Theaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 198–206.

Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Fourth Edition. Boston: PEARSON.

Ennis, R. H. (1985). A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thingking Skills. In Education Leadership (pp. 44–48). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from http://www.qcc.cuny.edu

Fah, L. (2009). Logical Thinking Abilities among Form 4 Students in the Interior Division of Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 32(2), 161–187.

Giancoli, D. (2001). Fisika Edisi Kelima Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hackathorn, J., Solomon, E. ., Blankmeyer, K. ., Tennial, R. ., & Garczynski, A. . (2011). Learning by Doing: An Empirical Study of Active Teaching Techniques. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(2), 40–54.

Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A Comparison of Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits in Simulation Only and Simulation-Laboratory Contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 71–93.

Jayanti, I. B., Suyidno, S., & Hartini, S. (2014). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) dan Media Pembelajaran Inkuiri berbasis Ketrampilan Berpikir Kritis. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 2(1), 1–10.

Kreith, F., Manglik, R. ., & Bohn, M. . (2011). Principles of Heat Transfer Seventh Edition. USA: Cengage Learning.

Leron, U. (2004). Mathematical Thinking & Human Nature: Consonance & Conflict. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3(15).

Mustaqim, M. (2015). Pengaruh Diskusi Terhadap Model Mental Mahasiswa tentang Fenomena Perambatan Panas. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: PPs UM.

Nottis, K. E., Prince, M., & Vigeant, M. (2010). Building an Understanding of Heat Transfer Concepts in Undergraduate Chemical Engineering Courses. US-China Education Review, 7(2).

Ornek, F., Robinson, W., & Haugan, M. (2008). What makes physics difficult? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(1), 30–34.

Romano, A. (2007). Elements of A Context-Specific Model of Critical Thinking in Management: A Delphi Study.

Sarwi, S., & Liliasari, L. (2009). Penerapan Strategi Kooperatif dan Pemecahan Masalah pada Konsep Gelombang untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 5(2).

Setyorini, U., Sukiswo, S., & Subali, B. (2011). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 7(1).

Subagyo, Y., Wiyanto, W., & Marwoto, P. (2009). Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Ketrampilan Proses Sains untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Suhu dan Pemuaian. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 5(1).

Sumarmo, U., & Nishitani, I. (2009). High Level Mathematical Thinking: Experiments with High School and Under Graduate Students using Various Approaches and Strategies. In Makalah disajikan pada Seminar di UPI, September 2009.

Suryana, A. (2012). Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis Tingkat Lanjut (Advanced Mathematical Thinking) dalam Matakuliah Statistika Matematika 1. In Makalah disajikan pada Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika di Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY, November 2012.

Tuna, A., Biber, A., & Incikapi, L. (2013). An Analysis of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Logical Thinking Levels: Case of Turkey. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in The World, 3(1), 83–91.

Widayanto, W. (2009). Pengembangan Keterampilan Proses dan Pemahaman Siswa Kelas X melalui Kit Optik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 5(1).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v6i2.4909