Kepraktisan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Model Generative Learning  dengan Pendekatan Open-ended Problem

Chichi Rahayu; Eliyarti Eliyarti; Festiyed Festiyed

doi:10.20527/bipf.v7i3.6139

Kepraktisan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Model Generative Learning dengan Pendekatan Open-ended Problem

Chichi Rahayu, Eliyarti Eliyarti, Festiyed Festiyed

Abstract

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini mendeskripsikan tingkat kepraktisan perangkat pembelajaran Fisika berbasis generative learning dengan pendekatan open-ended problem untuk menstimulus keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Penelitian dan pengembangan menggunakan model 4D terdiri dari tahap pendefinisian (define), perancangan (design), pengembangan (development), dan penyebaran (disseminate). Uji kepraktisan dilakukan setelah tahap pendefenisian dan tahap perancangan selesai. Instrumen penelitian ini lembar observasi keterlaksanaan RPP, angket respon guru, angket respon peserta didik, dan yang menjadi responden ialah guru dan peserta didik kelas X MIA disalah satu SMAN di Kota Padang. Metode yang digunakan adalah statistik deskriptif untuk mendapatkan nilai rata-rata dan persentase. Perangkat pembelajaran dikatakan praktis jika penilaian para praktisi menyatakan perangkat pembelajaran dapat diterapkan. Berdasarkan respon guru diperoleh persentase rata-rata 87,86% memenuhi kategori sangat praktis dan respon peserta didik 76, 91% memenuhi kategori praktis. Secara keseluruhan rata-rata persentase kepraktisan perangkat pembelajaran ini adalah 83,46% dengan kategori sangat praktis. Hal ini menunjukan perangkat pembelajaran ini mudah digunakan serta bermanfaat bagi guru dan peserta didik.

Abstract: Learning material in this study is based on generative learning models with open-ended problem approaches to stimulate students' critical thinking skills. The purpose of this study is to know and measure the practical level of generative learning-based physics learning material with an open-ended problem approach to stimulate students' critical thinking skills. Practicality is the level of use of the use of learning material produced as development products. This type of research is 4D consisting of the stages of defining, designing, developing, and disseminating. Practical tests are carried out after the defining stage, and the design stage is complete. The instrument of this study was the observation plan of RPP implementation, the teacher response questionnaire and response questionnaire of students, and the respondents were teachers and students of class X MIA in one of the SMAN in the city of Padang. The method used is descriptive statistics to get the average value and percentage. Learning material is said to be practical if practitioners' assessments state that learning tools can be applied. Based on the teacher's response, the average percentage of 87.86% meets the very practical category, and the percentage of the average response of students is 76.91% fulfilling the practical category. Overall the average percentage of the practicalities of this learning device is 83.46% with a very practical category. This shows that this learning device is easy to use and useful for teachers and students.

Keywords

praktikalitas , generative learning, open-ended problem

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abbasi, A., & Izadpanah, S. (2018). Research article the relationship between critical thinking , its subscales and academic achievement of english language course : The predictability of ingilizce dersinde eleştirel düşünme ve alt faktörlerinin başari ile ilişkisi : Eleştirel. Academy Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 91–105.

Abidin, Y. (2014). Desain sistem pembelajaran dalam konteks kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Radika Aditama.

Agustyaningrum, N., & Gusmania, Y. (2017). Praktikalitas dan keefektifan modul geometri analitik ruang berbasis konstruktivisme. Jurnal Dimensi, 6(3), 412–420.

Alghafri, A. S. R., & Ismail, H. N. Bin. (2014). The effects of integrating creative and critical thinking on schools students ’ thinking. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4(6), 518–525.

Ariani, M. D., Candiasa, M., & Marhaeni, A. (2014). Pengaruh implementasi open-ended problem dalam pembelajaran matematika terhadap kemampuan. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 4(1).

Cahyaningrum, V. D., Syaifuddin, M., & Effendi, M. M. (2018). The effects of the application of generative learning model with brainstorming technique on st udents ’ mathematical reasoning and communication abilities. Advances in Socisl Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 160(Incomed 2017), 298–302.

Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development : Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37–48.

Djamas, D., Kamus, Z., & Murtiani. (2013). Analisis situasi aktivitas pembelajaran fisika kelas x sman kota padang dalam rangka pengembangan keterampilan dan karakter berpikir kritis siswa. EKSAKTA, 2(XIV), 24–38.

Eliyarti, & Rahayu, C. (2019a). Deskripsi efektivitas kegiatan praktikum dalam perkuliahan kimia dasar mahasiswa teknik. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 3(2), 70–76.

Eliyarti, & Rahayu, C. (2019b). Tinjauan Motivasi berprestasi mahasiswa teknik dalam perkuliahan kimia dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Glasser, 3(2), 196–204.

Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving junior high schools’ critical thinking skills based on test three different models of learning. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 101–116.

Husain, H., Bais, B., Hussain, A., & Samad, S. A. (2012). How to construct open ended questions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 456–462.

Karakoc, M. (2016). The significance of critical thinking ability in terms of education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(7), 81–84.

Karpov, A. O. (2016). Generative learning in research education for the knowledge society. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1621–1633.

Kartika, E. (2015). Pengajuan masalah matematika berdasarkan open-ended problem picture ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika. Jurnal Apotema, 1(2), 36–46.

Kurniati, D. (2013). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran matematika sekolah menengah pertama dengan sistem character based integrated learning. Kurnal Kreano, 4(November), 159–173.

Mihajlovic, A., & Dejic, M. (2015). Using open-ended problems and problem posing activities in using open-ended problems and problem posing. The 9th International MCG Conference, (June), 34–40.

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum 2013: perubahan dan pengembangan kurikulum 2013 merupakan persoalan penting dan genting. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Murni, M. (2013). Open-Ended Approach in Learning to Improve Students Thinking Skills in Banda Aceh. International Journal of Independent Research and Studies (IJIRS), 2(2), 95–101.

Popil, I. (2010). Nurse education today promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse Education Today; Elsevier, 31(2), 204–207.

Prastowo, A. (2011). Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif. Yogyakarta: DIVA Press.

Rahayu, C., & Eliyarti, E. (2019). Implementation of physics learning materials based generative learning with open-ended problem approach to stimulate critical thinking skills. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 4(2), 99.

Rahayu, C., & Festiyed. (2018). Validitas perangkat pembelajaran fisika sma berbasis model pembelajaran generatif dengan pendekatan open- ended problem untuk menstimulus keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 1–6.

Rahmawati, Y., & Harta, I. (2014). Keefektifan pendekatan open-ended dan ctl ditinjau dari haisl belajar kognitif dan afektif. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 113–126.

Riduwan, R. (2009). Belajar mudah penelitian untuk guru, karyawan dan peneliti pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sastrini, M., Garminah, N. N., & Wibawa, C. M. (2014). Pengaruh model pembelajaran generatif terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis ipa siswa sd kelas v gugus iii kecamatan tejakula. E-Journal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 2(1).

Sehe, Tolla, A., Kamaruddin, & Hamsa, A. (2016). The development of indonesian language learning materials based on local wisdom of the First Grade Students in Sma Negeri 3 Palopo. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(5), 913–922.

Srianty, Samad, A., & Patandean, A. . (2011). Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis fisika siswa kelas XI ipa3 SMA negeri 1 bungoro melalui model pembelajaran generatif. JSPF, 7(1), 1–12.

Trianto, T. (2012). Model pembelajaran terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Wena, M. (2009). Strategi pembelajaran inovatif kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Widana, M., Suhandana, A., & Atmadja, B. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berorientasi pemecahan masalah open- ended terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar biologi siswa kelas vii smp negeri 1 kintamani. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 4(1), 1–12.

Wulandari, I. G. A. A., Nyoman, D., & Nyoman, T. (2014). Pengaruh model pembelajaran generatif terhadap minat dan hasil belajar ipa pada siswa kelas v sd ( studi kasus di gugus letkol wisnu denpasar utara). E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 4(3), 1–10.

Zakirman, Z. (2017a). Kelompok gaya belajar reflektor menurut teori Honey Mumford dalam paradigma perpustakaan. Shaut Al-Muktabah Jurnal Perpustakaan, Arsip Dan Dokumentasi, 8(2), 133–142.

Zakirman, Z. (2017b). Pengelompokkan gaya belajar mahasiswa menurut teori honey mumford berdasarkan intensitas kunjungan pustaka. Ristekdik, 4(1), 1–6.

Zakirman, & Hidayati. (2017). Praktikalitas media video dan animasi dalam pembelajajaran di smp. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 06(April), 85–93.

Zakirman, Lufri, & Khairani. (2018). Factors influencing the use of lecture methods in learning activities : Teacher perspective. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 178(ICoIE 2018), 4–6.

Zakirman, & Rahayu, C. (2018). Popularitas whatsapp sebagai media komunikasi dan berbagi informasi akademik mahasiswa. Shaut Al-Maktabah: Jurnal Perpustakaan, Arsip Dan Dokumentasi, 10(1), 27–38.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v7i3.6139