COMPARISON OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OFTHE SINGLE CANTILEVER SPRING BY USING ONE AND TWO ROUNDS COIL
Abstract
Background: Removable orthodontic appliances have been widely used for correcting malocclusion. It has active components to move a tooth, including a single cantilever spring. Single cantilever spring is indicated for correcting a tooth with a mild degree rotation, moving the individual tooth to labial or buccal direction. In orthodontics, in order to shift the tooth is required aintermitten strength, which one of them is by lengthen the wire with coil addition. An activated spring means performing deflection that produces compressive pressure to shift the tooth. Purpose: To compare the compressive strength of the single cantilever spring by using one and two rounds of coil. Methods: This research was a pure experimentation using post test-only with control design, consisted of two treatment groups, those groups are a single cantilever spring using one round coil and two rounds coil and a control group without using coil. The samples of this study use stainless steel wire with diameter of 0.6 mm, each group is deflected by 2 mm based on millimeter paper block. The compressive strength of each group was measured using a Gauge force meter. Results: Average scoring of the compressive strength was 307.17 gr/mm2 for the control group, the treatment group with single cantilever spring using one round coil was 197.83 gr/mm2 and single cantilever spring group using two rounds coil was 117.33 gr/mm2. The results of LSD test showed that there was significant difference between treatment group and control group. Conclusion: It concludes that the addition of the round coils can decrease compressive strength single cantilever spring.
Keywords: compressive strength, coil, deflection, single cantilever spring
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ABSTRACT
Background: Removable orthodontic appliances have been widely used for correcting malocclusion. It has active components to move a tooth, including a single cantilever spring. Single cantilever spring is indicated for correcting a tooth with a mild degree rotation, moving the individual tooth to labial or buccal direction. In orthodontics, in order to shift the tooth is required aintermitten strength, which one of them is by lengthen the wire with coil addition. An activated spring means performing deflection that produces compressive pressure to shift the tooth. Purpose: To compare the compressive strength of the single cantilever spring by using one and two rounds of coil. Methods: This research was a pure experimentation using post test-only with control design, consisted of two treatment groups, those groups are a single cantilever spring using one round coil and two rounds coil and a control group without using coil. The samples of this study use stainless steel wire with diameter of 0.6 mm, each group is deflected by 2 mm based on millimeter paper block. The compressive strength of each group was measured using a Gauge force meter. Results: Average scoring of the compressive strength was 307.17 gr/mm2 for the control group, the treatment group with single cantilever spring using one round coil was 197.83 gr/mm2 and single cantilever spring group using two rounds coil was 117.33 gr/mm2. The results of LSD test showed that there was significant difference between treatment group and control group. Conclusion: It concludes that the addition of the round coils can decrease compressive strength single cantilever spring.
Keywords: compressive strength, coil, deflection, single cantilever spring
Raharjo P. Orthodontic basic edition 2. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2012. p. 27-28
Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. New Delhi: Jaypee, 2007. p.422-424.
Adams CP.Design, construction and use of aircraft orthodontic off. Jakarta: WidyaMedika, 1991. p.1-17.
Raharjo P.Removable orthodontic appliance. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2009. p.2-46.
Gill DS. Ortodonsiaat a glance. Jakarta: EGC, 2014. p.107-115.
McCabe J F, Wall A W G. Materials Dentistry Edition9. Jakarta, 2014. p.122.
Muraview SE, Ospanova GB, Shylyakhova MY. Estimation of force produced by nikel-titanium superlasticarchwires at large deflactions. Am J OrthodDentofacOrthop 2011; 119: 604-604.
Solanki G, Lohra N, Lohra J. A review on defferent orthodontic wires. Asian Pasific Journal of Nurshing 2014; 1(1): 24-26.
Phillips.Textbook material science of dentistry. Jakarta: EGC, 2003. p.201-208.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/dentino.v2i1.2594
DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/dentino.v2i1.2594.g2252
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 964 timesPDF - 1750 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Contact Us:
Faculty of Dentistry
Lambung Mangkurat University
Jalan Veteran No. 128 B Banjarmasin, Indonesia
E-mail. [email protected]
Website. fkg.ulm.ac.id
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.