THE DIFFERENCES OF HEAD SHAPE CHARACTERISTICS IN KALIMANTAN TRIBES USING FRONTOPARIETAL INDEX

Khanifatu Zahroh, Irnamanda DH, Iwan Aflanie

Abstract


Backgrounds: Kalimantan is the largest island in Indonesia that consists of 5 provinces, including South Kalimantan and Central Kalimantan. South Kalimantan and Central Kalimantan are inhabited by several tribes such as Dayak Bukit tribe, Banjar Hulu tribe and DayakNgajutribe. The geographic condition of inter-ethnic residence affects the phenotype pattern that will characterize each population. Those characteristics can be measured using the frontoparietal index that are classified into 3 characteristic forms, which are <68.9% (Sthenomethopia/narrow forehead), 69.0-70.9% (Metriometopia/moderate forehead) and >71,0 (eurymetopia/wide forehead). Objective: To know the difference in head shape characteristicsusing frontoparietal index betweenDayak Bukit tribe, Banjar Hulu tribe and DayakNgaju tribe. Methods: This research was an analytic observational study with cross sectional design,using 180 people that consisted of 60 people from Dayak Bukit tribe, 60 people from DayakNgaju tribe, and 60 people from Banjar Hulu tribe which were measured by using digital caliper. Results: Measurements showed that the mean of frontoparietal index were 89,20% (Eurymetopia) in Dayak Bukit tribe, 88,77% (Eurymetopia) in BanjarHulu tribe, and 89,63% (Eurymetopia) in DayakNgaju tribe. The results of the research analyzed by Chi Square test with p=0,36 (p>0,05). It  showed thatthere was no difference in head shape characteristics using frontoparietal index between Dayak Bukit tribe, Banjar Hulu tribe and DayakNgaju tribe. Conclusion: Frontoparietal index can not be used to differentiate the head shape characteristics of Dayak Bukit tribe, Banjar Hulu tribe and DayakNgaju tribe.

Keywords


Banjar Hulu’s Tribe; Dayak Bukit’s Tribe; Dayak Ngaju’s Tribes; Frontoparietal Index

Full Text:

PDF

References


Suryo. Genetika Manusia. Yogyakarta : Gajah Mada University Press : 2011. Hlm. 3-20. 2. Irsa R, Syaifullah, Tjong D. Variasi Kefalometri pada Beberapa Suku di Sumatera Barat. J Bio UA. 2013; 2(2):130–37. 3. Umar. Comparism of Cephalometric Indices Between The Hausa and Yoruba Ethnic Groups of Nigeria. Res J Med Sci. 2011; 5(2):83–89. 4. Romdhon AR. Identifikasi Forensik Rekonstruktif Menggunakan Indeks Kefalometris. Majority. 2015;4(1):24. 5. Wahyudin. Merajud Dunia Islam Dunia Melayu. Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman. 2015; 14(2): 171-72. 6. Indriati E. Antropometri Untuk Kedokteran, Keperawatan, Gizi, dan Olahraga. Yogyakarta: PT Intan Sejati ; 2010. Hlm.1-5. 7. Lubis F. Perbedaan Rerata Indeks Cephalic Dan Indeks Frontoparietal Antara Suku Bali Dan Suku Batak Di Kecamatan Tanjung Senang Bandar Lampung. Skripsi. Bandar Lampung :Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Lampung ; 2017. Hlm.62-63. 8. Institute of Medicine. Assesment of the NIOSH Head-and-Face Anthropometric Survey of U.S. repirator users. Washington : The National Academies Press ; 2007.p.32. 9. Karaca, Gülcen B, Kus M, ElmaliF,Kus I. Morphometric Facial Analysis Of Turkish Adults. Balikesir Saglik Bil Derg. 2012; 1(1):710. 10. Jadav HR. A study to correlate cephalicindex of various caste/races of Gujerat stateAhmedabad: NJIRM ; 2011.p.18-22. 11. Riwut T. Maneser Panatau Tatu Hiang Menyelami Kekayaan Leluhur. Yogyakarta :Pusakalima ; 2003. Hlm.192-231. 12. Mujiburrahman, Alfisyah, Syadzali A. Badingsanak Banjar-Dayak Identitas Agama Dan Ekonomi Etnisitas Di Kalimantan Selatan. Yogyakarta :Riset Kolaborasi Program Knowledge Based Pluralism CRCS Universitas Gadjah Mada ; 2011. Hlm.6-7. 13. Koentjaraningrat. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta : PT. RinekaCipta ; 2002. Hlm.264. 14. Ibnu S. Analisis Rivalitas Laten Antara Multikulturalis medan Radikalisme Berbasis Etnikdan Agama di Indonesia :Sebuah Studi Sosiologi Konflik. Osiologi Reflektif. 2011; 6(1) : 29-39.

Rostina T. Analisa profil jaringan lunak menurut metode Holdaway padamahasiswa FKG USU Suku Deutromelayu. Tesis. Medan :USU. 2009. Hlm.2. 16. Cray J, James J. The interaction of androgenic hormone and craniofacial variation: relationship between epignetics and the environment on the genome with an eye toward non syndromiccraniostosis. University Pittsburgh : 2009. Hlm.1-12. 17. Aflanie, I ,Haifa M. Perbandingan Karakteristik Pola Rugae Palatina Antara Suku Dayak Bukit, Suku Banjar Hulu Dan Suku Dayak Ngaju. The Indonesian Association of Forensic Medicine. Prosiding Pertemuan Ilmiah Tahunan;15-16 Juli2017. Pekanbaru: Riau; 2017. Hlm.145-52.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/dentino.v3i1.4610

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/dentino.v3i1.4610.g4015

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 333 times
PDF - 292 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Contact Us:
Faculty of Dentistry
Lambung Mangkurat University
Jalan Veteran No. 128 B Banjarmasin, Indonesia

E-mail. [email protected]
Website. fkg.ulm.ac.id

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.