Public Value Creation Through QRIS Use In Bojonegoro: A Public Service Dominant Logic Approach

Keyka Wahyu Putri Octavia, Muhammad Miftahul Huda, Sri Kasiami

Abstract


Digital transformation has expanded digital public services, including retail payment systems through the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS). Despite its rapid adoption and benefits in improving transaction efficiency and convenience, digital security risks and potential fraud may affect public trust and service sustainability. This study aims to examine perceptions of security and the process of public value creation in the use of QRIS in Bojonegoro Regency, as well as the role of institutions in ensuring the security and sustainability of QRIS as a digital public service. This study employs a qualitative approach using in-depth interviews with users, culinary merchants, regulators (Bank Indonesia), and payment service providers (PSPs). Data were thematically analyzed using the public value concept and the Public Service-Dominant Logic (PSDL) framework. The findings indicate that QRIS is positively perceived in terms of convenience and efficiency; however, perceptions of security and transaction certainty remain varied. Fraud risks and transaction failures encourage users and merchants to adopt precautionary practices, highlighting the importance of institutional responsiveness in maintaining public trust. The study demonstrates that public value in QRIS is co-created through interactions among actors, technology, and service experiences, positioning transaction security as a key factor for the sustainability of digital payment services at the local level. 

Keywords


QRIS; Public Value; Transaction Security; PSDL; Digital Public Service

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ardianto, H. (2025). Peluang dan Tantangan Implementasi Sistem Pembayaran Digital bagi Produktivitas UMKM di Era Ekonomi Digital. Lokawati: Jurnal Penelitian Manajemen Dan Inovasi Riset, 3, 290–302. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396098748_Peluang_dan_Tantangan_Implementasi_Sistem_Pembayaran_Digital_bagi_Produktivitas_UMKM_di_Era_Ekonomi_Digital

Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D., & Barberis, J. (2017). FinTech, RegTech, and the Reconceptualization of Financial Regulation. In Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (Vol. 37, Issue 3). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/vol37/iss3/2

Azmi, M., Fadillah, A., Ramadhan, M. G., & Ariefiandi, M. E. (2024). Jakarta Raya;Jl. Raya Perjuangan No. 81 Marga Mulya. Journal of Information and Information Security (JIFORTY), 5(2), 88955882. http://ejurnal.ubharajaya.ac.id/index.php/jiforty

Bank Indonesia. (2025). Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS). Bank Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/id/fungsi-utama/sistem-pembayaran/ritel/kanal-layanan/qris/default.aspx

Blaschke, M., Riss, U., Haki, K., & Aier, S. (2019). Design Principles for Digital Value Co-creation Networks: a Service-dominant Logic Perspective. Electronic Markets, 29(3), 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00356-9

Claessens, S., Frost, J., Turner, G., & Zhu, F. (2018). Fintech Credit Markets Around the World: Size, Drivers and Policy Issues. BIS Quarterly Review.

Creswell, J. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative,and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth). SAGE.

Databoks. (2025). Tren Transaksi QRIS Meningkat pada Kuartal I 2025. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/keuangan/statistik/68931f19ba160/tren-transaksi-qris-meningkat-pada-kuartal-i-2025

Fikri, M., Herlina, L., & Winar, I. (2025). Pengaruh Kepercayaan dan Persepsi Risiko terhadap Penggunaan QRIS sebagai Instrumen Transaksi Keuangan Digital pada Generasi Z di Kota Bandung. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i5.2864

Gomber, P., Koch, J. A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0852-x

Grönroos, C. (2011). A Service Perspective on Business Relationships: The Value Creation, Interaction and Marketing Interface. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.036

Hajar, S., & Arma, N. A. (2024). Co-creating Public Value Into Digital-Based Public Service Innovation in the Village Governance. Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 14(3), 516–538. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v14i3.15891

InterActive QRIS. (2025). Pertumbuhan Transaksi QRIS yang Melonjak Memahami Revolusi Pembayaran Digital di Indonesia. https://qris.interactive.co.id/homepage/blog-detail.php?lang=id&page=MjEz-pertumbuhan-transaksi-qris-yang-melonjak-memahami-revolusi-pembayaran-digital-di-indonesia

Jundy Kumoro, C., Ryandini, E. Y., & Samin, N. (2024). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Adopsi Pembayaran QR Code (QRIS) di Toko Fisik. Journal of Innovation in Management, Accounting and Business, 3(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.56916/jimab.v3i2.865

Kartika, L. N. I., & Machmuddah, Z. (2026). Gen Z’s Understanding Of Internal Controls Dominates Qris Phishing Prevention. Keuangan Dan Auditing, 6(2), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.56696/jaka.v6i2.15318

Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tõnurist, P. (2019). The potential Impacts of Digital Technologies on Co-production and Co-creation. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1665–1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619807

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic-Inquiry. SAGE Publications. Rafaeli, A., Altman, D., Gremler, D. D., Huang, M. H., Grewal, D., Iyer, B., Parasuraman, A., & de Ruyter, K. (2017). The Future of Frontline Research: Invited essays. Journal of Service Research, 20(1),

Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257496373_Creating_public_value_Strategic_management_in_government_Cambridge_MA_Harvard_University_Press_by_Mark_Moore

Nabila, A. P., Raharso, S., & Tiorida, E. (2025). The Influence of Trust and Transaction Security on Interest in Using The QRIS Payment System. Airlangga Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.20473/ajim.v6i2.72597

Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012466935

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Pulungan, L. H., Pratama, A., & Faroqi, A. (2025). Evaluasi Faktor Penerimaan Pengguna Terhadap Layanan QRIS Pada Generasi Z Menggunakan Modifikasi TAM. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Indonesia, 5(4), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.781

Puspitasari, A. A., & Salehudin, I. (2022). Quick Response Indonesian Standard (QRIS): Does Government Support Contribute to Cashless Payment System Long-term Adoption? Journal of Marketing Innovation (JMI), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.35313/jmi.v2i1.29

Rafaeli, A., Altman, D., Gremler, D. D., Huang, M. H., Grewal, D., Iyer, B., Parasuraman, A., & de Ruyter, K. (2017). The Future of Frontline Research: Invited Commentaries. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670516679275

Rahayu, R., & Day, J. (2017). E-commerce adoption by SMEs in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia. Eurasian Business Review, 7(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-016-0044-6

Rodriguez Müller, A. P., Flores, C. C., Albrecht, V., Steen, T., & Crompvoets, J. (2021). A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence on (Digital) Public Services Co-creation. In Administrative Sciences (Vol. 11, Issue 4). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040130

Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2020). Challenges and Trends of Financial Technology (Fintech): A systematic literature review. In Information (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 12, pp. 1–20). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120590

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, November, 3–28.

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and Axioms: an Extension and Update of Service-Dominant Logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3

Zetzsche, D. A., Arner, D. W., & Buckley, R. P. (2020). Decentralized Finance. Journal of Financial Regulation, 6(2), 172–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjaa010

Yuliyanti, N., Abbas, E. W., Rahmia, S. H., Jumriani, J., & Nur’aini, F. (2025). The Socioeconomic Conditions of Porters at Sudimampir Market Amidst Modernization. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 7(1), 129-138.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/issj.v7i2.17890

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

The Innovation of Social Studies Journal (ISSJ) has been indexed and abstracted by:

     



Managed by:

SOCIAL SCIENCE EDUCATION, LAMBUNG MANGKURAT UNIVERSITY

Jl. Brigadier General H. Hasan Basry, ULM Banjarmasin Campus, Banjarmasin City, North Banjarmasin District, Postal Code 70123, South Kalimantan Province, Indonesia


Journal License:


Journal of The Innovation of Social Studies Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License