Development of Five-Tier Diagnostic Test to Identify Misconception  in Rigid Body Equilibrium

Uci Fatonah; Maison Maison; M Hidayat

doi:10.20527/bipf.v10i2.13077

Development of Five-Tier Diagnostic Test to Identify Misconception in Rigid Body Equilibrium

Uci Fatonah, Maison Maison, M Hidayat

Abstract

The misconception is the interpretation of a concept that is not following the conception agreed upon by scientists. The purpose of the research was to determine the product development process of the five-tier diagnostic test and the product quality of the five-tier diagnostic test. The type of research used is Research and Development (R&D). The development model used is the 4D model. The research sample was 98 students of class XI MIPA 1, XI MIPA 2, XI MIPA 3 and XI MIPA 4 at Senior High School 1 Jambi City. The results showed that the quality of the instrument was feasible to use because the test showed valid qualitative and quantitative results.

Keywords

Five-tier Diagnostic Test; Misconception; Rigid Body Equilibrium

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anggereni, S., Rismawati, & Ashar, H. (2019). Perbandingan pengetahuan prosedural menggunakan model discovery terbimbing dengan model inquiry terbimbing. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 156–161.

Hanafi, H. (2017). Konsep penelitian R & D dalam bidang pendidikan. Saintifika Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 4(2), 129–150.

Ibrahim, M. (2019). Model pembelajaran P2OC2R untuk mengubah konsepsi ipa siswa. sidoarjo.pdf. Surabaya: Zifatma Jawara.

Inggit, S. M., Liliawati, W., & Suryana, I. (2021). Identifikasi miskonsepsi dan penyebabnya menggunakan instrumen five-tier fluid static test ( 5tfst ) pada peserta didik kelas xi sekolah menengah atas. JoTaLP: Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 6(1), 49–68.

Jubaedah, S. (2017). Pengembangan tes diagnostik berformat four-tier untuk mengidentifikasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) SNF 2017, VI(October), 35–40.

Lestari, D., Handayani, D., Darussyamsu, R., & Armen. (2019). Identifikasi miskonsepsi peserta didik kelas viii smpn 21 padang pada materi sistem gerak makhluk hidup menggunakan teknik CRI. ATRIUM PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI Identifikasi, 4(1), 135–142.

Maison, Kurniawan, W., Kurniawan, D. A., & Hanum, A. (2021). Application of a web-based four-tier misconception instrument on the topic of work and energy. Proceedings of the 3rd Green Development International Conference (GDIC 2020), 205(Gdic 2020), 206–208. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210825.037

Maison, M., Asma, R., Doyan, A., & Saputri, L. (2022). How do additional instructions change the answer ? Study of pre-service physics teachers ’ misconception about buoyancy. The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012048

Maison, M., Lestari, N., & Widaningtyas, A. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.314

Nurdin, I., & Hartati, S. (2019). Metodologi penelitian sosial. Surabaya: Media Sahabat Cendekia.

Rusilowati, A. (2015). Pengembangan tes diagnostik sebagai alat

evaluasi kesulitan belajar fisika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 1–10.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thiagarajan, S., Sammel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children:A sourcebook. Leadership Training Institute/Special Education, University of Minnesota. (Vol. 14). Minneapolis, Minnesota: Leadership Training Institute/Special Education, University of Minnesota. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(76)90066-2

Trisnawati, A., Erniwati, Eso, R., & Mustari. (2020). Analisis miskonsepsi terhadap materi rangkaian listrik searah ( dc ) pada siswa smk negeri kota kendari menggunakan four-tier diagnostic test. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika, 5(4), 287–294.

Yolanda, Y. (2017). Remediasi miskonsepsi kinematika gerak lurus dengan pendekatan STAD. Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), 1(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.31539/spej.v1i1.76

Yusri. (2016). Ilmu Pragmatik dalam perspektif kesopanan berbahasa. Deepublish. Deepublish.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i2.13077