Implementation of NPIVL to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of Pre-Service Physics Teacher
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the critical thinking skills of pre-service physics teacher through the implementation of the Nuclear Physics Inquiry Virtual Laboratory (NPIVL) program. This study used a quantitative pre-experimental study with one group pretest-posttest design involving 14 pre-service physics teachers at one of universities in Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan. The research sample was taken using purposive sampling. The instrument used in this study was a test of critical thinking skills with 25 essay type questions. The questions were compiled based on five indicators of critical thinking skills, namely elementary clarification, basic support, inference, advanced clarification, and strategy and tactics. Data were analyzed using quantitative descriptive. Based on the results of the study, it was found that pre-service physics teachers’ critical thinking skills had a normalized N-gain of 0.33 in the medium category. The percentage of the increase in critical thinking skills indicators was varied, from the largest were basic support, elementary clarification, inference, advanced clarification, and the smallest was strategy and tactics. Based on these findings it can be concluded that the implementation of the NPIVL program can improve the thinking skills of pre-servive physics teacher.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arsal, Z. (2017). The impact of inquiry-based learning on the critical thinking dispositions of pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1326–1338.
Beckera, S; Klein, P; Gößling, A; Kuhn, J. (2020). Using mobile devices to enhance inquiry-based learning processes. Learning and Instruction, 69(101350), 1–14.
Bhanthumnavin, D; Bhanthumnavin, V. (2014). The empirical development of cognitive, affective, and behavioral tendency measures of attitudes toward nuclear power plants in Thai university students. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 73, 86–95.
Bird, D. K., Haynes, K., Honer, R. v d, Aneney, J. M., & Poortinga, W. (2014). Nuclear power in Australia: A comparative analysis of public opinion regarding climate change and the Fukushima disaster. Energi Policy, 65, 644–653.
Brown, K. (2018). The effects of a university research reactor’s outreach program on students’ attitudes and knowledge about nuclear radiation. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), 1–14.
Chang, CJ; Liu, CC; Wen, CT, Tseng,LW; Chang, HY; Chang, HH; Chiang, SHF; Hwang, FK; Yang, C. (2020). The impact of light-weight inquiry with computer simulations on science learning in classrooms. Computers & Education, 146(103770).
Ennis, R. . (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18, 4–10.
Hake. R. R. (1998). Interactive -engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survei of mechanics test data for introductionary physics cource. American Journal Physics, 66(1), 64–67.
Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.
Hartini, S;, & Liliasari, S. (2020). Investigation in the introductionary nuclear physics course for pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521, 022055.
Hartini, S., Liliasari, S., Sinaga, P., & Abdullah, A. G. (2021). An investigation of critical thinking skill of pre-service physics teacher in the case of fission and fusion reactions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-
/1806/1/012031
Hartini, Sri, Abdullah, A. G., Liliasari, Sinaga, P., Setiadipura, T., & Biddinika, M. K. (2021). Pre-Service Physics Teacher’S Knowledge and Attitude: an Investigation on Nuclear Science and Technology Topics. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16, 26–33.
Karpudewan, M., & Chong, T. Y. (2018). Evaluating Radioactivity Remote Laboratory’s Effectiveness in Learning Radioactivity Concepts. Research in Science Education.
Krisnaningsih, E., & Hariyono, E. (2022). Implementation of Multi-representation Learning on Climate Change Integrated Dynamic Fluid to Improve Student’s Problem-Solving Skills. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 44.
Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. . (2015). Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students’ critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 68–79.
Malkawi, S., & Al-Araidah, O. (2013). Students’ assessment of interactive distance experimentation in nuclear reactor physics laboratory. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(5), 512–518.
Roh, S., & Kim, D. (2017). Effect of Fukushima accident on public acceptance of nuclear energy (Fukushima accident and nuclear public acceptance). Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy.
Sinaga, P., Setiawan, W., & Liana, M. (2022). The impact of electronic interactive teaching materials (EITMs) in e-learning on junior high school students’ critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46(101066).
Srisawasdi, N., & Kroothkeaw, S. (2014). Supporting Students’ Conceptual Development of Light Refraction by Simulation-Based Open Inquiry with Dual-Situated Learning Model. J. Comput, Educ, 1(1), 49–79.
Stefanelli, Seidl, R., & Siegrist, M. (2017). The discursive politics of nuclear waste: Rethinking participatory approaches and public perceptions over nuclear waste storage repositories in Switzerland. Energy Research&Social Science. 34, 72–81.
Syarip, S; Abimanyu, A; Hidayat, U S; Taxwim; Wahyono, P. I. (2018). Development of Internet Reactor Laboratory Using Kartini Reactor for Training and Education. Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS), 411–414.
Thaiposri, P., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through teaching and learning by inquiry-based learning activities using social network and cloud computing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2137 – 2144.
Tiruneh, D. T., Cock, M. De, & Elen, J. (2018). Designing Learning Environments for Critical Thinking: Examining Effective Instructional Approaches. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Volume, 16, 1065–1089.
Tiruneh, D. T., Cock, M. De, Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring Critical Thinking in Physics: Development and Validation of a Critical Thinking Test in Electricity and Magnetism. Int J of Sci and Math Educ, 15, 663–682.
Yacoubian, H. A. (2015). A Framework for Guiding Future Citizens to Think Critically About Nature of Science and Socioscientific Issues. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 248–260.
Yakovlev, D., Pryakhin, A., Korolev, S., Shaltaeva, Y., Samotaev, N., Yushkov, E., & Avanesyan, A. (2015). Engineering competitive education using modern network technologies in the NRNU MEPhI. IEEE Workshop on Environmental, Energy, and Structural Monitoring Systems.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i3.15042
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 233 timesPDF - 273 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed by:
The journal has been listed in:
Statistics Counter
1. From August 10, 2016 to present (broken code but the stats is still working)
2. From December 28, 2018 to present (updated stats)
Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License














