The Effectiveness of Introduction, Connection, Application, Reflection, and Extension Learning Model Based on PhET Simulation in Improving Students' Cognitive Ability on Dynamic Fluid Material

Mega Amalia Putri; Parlindungan Sinaga; Harun Imansyah

doi:10.20527/bipf.v12i3.19118

The Effectiveness of Introduction, Connection, Application, Reflection, and Extension Learning Model Based on PhET Simulation in Improving Students' Cognitive Ability on Dynamic Fluid Material

Mega Amalia Putri, Parlindungan Sinaga, Harun Imansyah

Abstract

This research aimed to assess the enhancement and effectiveness of the ICARE instructional approach, utilising PhET simulations, in augmenting students' cognitive abilities. The study employed a quantitative quasi-experimental design utilising a non-equivalent control group design. The sampling technique in this study was Convenience sampling involving 68 grade XI students (32 experimental class students and 36 control class students) in one of the public high schools in Bandung City. Student cognitive data was collected using a multiple-choice test instrument consisting of 23 questions designed by the researchers. Data analysis was employed to assess the improvement of cognitive ability through N-Gain calculation. In addition, statistical tests and effect size were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the ICARE learning model based on PhET simulation. The findings indicated that the group implementing the ICARE learning model based on PhET simulation demonstrated a greater cognitive ability enhancement than the group solely utilising the ICARE learning model. Statistical analyses revealed a significant disparity in cognitive ability improvement between students utilising the PhET-based ICARE learning model and those solely employing the ICARE learning model. Furthermore, effect size calculations indicated a notable discrepancy in cognitive ability enhancement between the experimental and control groups, characterised by a high category distinction. Therefore, it can be concluded that research using the ICARE learning model based on PhET simulation effectively improves students' cognitive abilities on dynamic fluid material.

Keywords

cognitive ability; dynamic fluids; ICARE learning model; PhET simulation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdan, K. (2019). Pengaruh model ICARE (Introduction, Connect, Apply, Reflect, Extend) terhadap keterampilan berfikir kritis siswa pada materu suhu dan kalor. In Skripsi.

Adams, W. K. (2010). Student engagement and learning with PhET interactive simulations. Il nuovo cimento C, 33(3), 21-32.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assesing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educatioanl objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Anggereni, S., Suhardiman, S., & Amaliah, R. (2021). Analisis ketersediaan peralatan, bahan ajar, administrasi laboratorium, keterlaksanaan kegiatan praktikum di laboratorium fisika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 5(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v5i3.3925

Asri, Y. N., Rusdiana, D., & Feranie, S. (2017, January). ICARE Model Integrated with Science Magic to Improvement of Students' Cognitive Competence In Heat and Temperature Subject. In International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 137-139). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icmsed-16.2017.30

Auliyah, P. S., Aksan, I. S., Raja, A. F., Putra, R. A., & Wiratomo, Y. (2023). Perkembangan Kognitif Dan Kaitannya Dengan Prestasi Siswa Kelas XII SMAS Pusaka 1. Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 9.

Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students’ conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature. Physical review physics education research, 17(2), 023108.

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.023108

Becker, L. A. (2000). Effect Size (ES). [Online]. https://lbecker.uccs.edu

Byrum, D. (2013). Instructional module development using the ICARE model with novice designers. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 5016-5022).

Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Cressa, J., & Mukhlis, M. (2023). Level kognitif taksonomi bloom pada soal mata pelajaran bahasa indonesia. J-LELC: Journal of Language Education, Linguistics, and Culture, 3(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.25299/j-lelc.2023.12094

Creswell, J.W. & Guetterman, T.C. (2019). Education research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitave ang qualitative research sixth edition. New York, NY: SAGE Publication, Inc.

Darwis, R., & Hardiansyah, M. R. (2023). Effect of PhET virtual laboratory implementation on students’ higher order thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1922-1928. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.1979

Destari, R., Siahaan, P., & Efendi, R. (2021). Efektivitas model ICARE untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kreatif alat optik. ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi Dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 193. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v7i1.4656

Efendi, I., Rokhman, F., Rustono, R., & Pristiwati, R. (2023). Implementing ICARE training model to enhance Indonesian students’ emceeing skills: Its process and impact. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 654-664. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i3.48660

Filgona, J., Sakiyo, J., Gwany, D. M., & Okoronka, A. U. (2020). Motivation in learning. Asian Journal of Education and social studies, 10(4), 16-37. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v10i430273

Finkelstein, N., Adams, W., Keller, C., Perkins, K., & Wieman, C. (2006). High-tech tools for teaching physics: The physics education technology project. Physics Education, 2(3), 110–121.

Fisher, W. P. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 21(1), 1095.

Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., & Borg, W.R. (2003). Educational research; An intoduction (7thed). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218-243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20 903302

Hardre, P. L., Crowson, H. M., Debacker, T. K., & White, D. (2007). Predicting the academic motivation of rural high school students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(4), 247-269. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.75.4.247-269

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. AERA-D-American educational research association’s division, measurment and research Methodology: Dept. Of Physics Indiana University.

Haliza, N. (2022). Pentingnya Berinovasi Dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/c8vq7

Hamundu, N. H., Eso, R., & Takda, A. (2023). Identification of student misconception using four tier diagnostic test on static and dynamic fluid materials. Indonesian Journal of Physics and its Applications, 3(1), 8-17.

Hardianti, T. (2018). Analisis kemampuan peserta didik pada ranah kognitif dalampembelajaran fisika SMA. Seminar Nasional Quantum, 25, 557.

Hoffman, B., & Ritchie, D. (1998). Teaching and learning online: Tools, templates, and training. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 119-123). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Inayah, C. F., Siagian, T. A., & Irsal, N. A. (2022). Analisis tingkat kognitif soal pada buku pendamping matematika materi spldv kelas viii berdasarkan taksonomi bloom revisi. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 6(2), 226-238.

https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.6.2.226-238

Keane, T., Keane, W. F., & Blicblau, A. S. (2014). Beyond traditional literacy: Learning and transformative practices using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 21(4), 769–781.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9353-5

Latukau, M. (2022). Pembelajaran ipa dengan model inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan proses sains siswa sd. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(23), 351-362. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7397601

Mahardika, I. K., Handono, S., Rofida, H. A., Zahro, F., & Seftiyani, M. A. (2023). Hakikat fisika sebagai pilar kehidupan. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmiah Transformatif, 7(12).

Mahdian, M., Almubarak, A., & Hikmah, N. (2019). Implementasi model pembelajaran Icare (Introduction-Connect-Apply-Reflect-Extend) terhadap keterampilan proses sains pada materi larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1).

https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.184

Mardhiyah, R. H., Aldriani, S. N. F., Chitta, F., & Zulfikar, M. R. (2021). Pentingnya keterampilan belajar di abad 21 sebagai tuntutan dalam pengembangan sumber daya manusia. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v12i1.5813

Martanti, N., Malika, E. R., & Setyaningsih, A. (2021). Pengaruh metode pembelajaran eksperimen virtual menggunakan PhET terhadap hasil belajar kognitif siswa. KONSTELASI: Konvergensi Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi, 5(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.24002/konstelasi.v1i1.4315

Muharti, M. (2016). Pengaruh penerapan model ICARE (Introduction, Connect, Apply, Reflect, and Extend) terhadap kemampuan kognitif dan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SMK (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Musri, M. (2020). Penggunaan model pembelajaran ICARE di materi termodinamika dalam upaya mendukung pengenalan teknologi hijau: studi kasus di SMA Negeri 2 pulau punjung kota dharmasraya. The Indonesian Green Technology Journal, 9(2).

21776/ub.igtj.2020.009.02.02

Muzana, S. R., Lubis, S. P. W., & Wirda. (2021). Penggunaan simulasi phet terhadap efektifitas belajar ipa. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan, 5(1), 227–236. http://jurnal.abulyatama.ac.id/index.php/dedikasi

Nabilah, M., Sitompul, S. S., & Hamdani, H. (2020). Analisis

kemampuan kognitif peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal momentum dan impuls. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1), 1-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jippf.v1i1.41876

Novitasari, D., Wibowo, F. C., & Raihanati, R. (2023). Aplikasi android fluida (adroda) berbasis stem berbantuan articulate storyline. XI, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.21009/03.1102.pf05

Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA abad 21 dengan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmpf.v9i1.31612

Rahayu, R., Iskandar, S., & Abidin, Y. (2022). Inovasi pembelajaran abad 21 dan penerapannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2099-2104. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2082

Rahma, A. A. (2022). Penerapan model group investigation (gi) berbantuan simulasi virtual phet terhadap kemampuan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(3), 2547-2555.

Rahmadhani, E., & Wahyuni, S. (2020). Integrasi pembelajaran matematika berbasis icare dan islam pada materi pecahan. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 4(1), 110.

https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v4i1.2874

Rahman, S. (2021). Pentingnya motivasi belajar dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar. Merdeka Belajar, November, 289–302.

Salyers, V., Carter, L., Barrett, P., & Williams, L. (2010). Evaluating

student and faculty satisfaction with a pedagogical framework. The Journal of Distance Education / Revue de l’Éducation à Distance, 24(3).

Saputra, R., Susilawati, S., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2020). Pengaruh penggunaan media simulasi Phet (Physics education technology) terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i2.1459

Saputri, M., Elisa, E., & Nurlianti, S. (2022). Effectiveness of ICARE learning model in improving students’ critical thinking skills and collaboration skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1128–1134. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1360

Scher, L., Kisker, E., & Dynarski, M. (2015). Designing and conducting strong quasi-experiments in education. Version 2. Decision Information Resources, Inc.

Siahaan, P., Dewi, E., & Suhendi, E. (2020). Introduction, Connection, Application, Reflection, and Extension (ICARE) learning model: The impact on students’ collaboration and communication skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(1), 109–119.

https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v9i1.5547

Sinuraya, J., Panggabean, D. D., & Wahyuni, I. (2019). Quality effectiveness analysis assessment of physics teaching materials-oriented ICARE method on student cognitive mastery based experiment skill level. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 5(3), 1-9.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan RASCH pada assessment pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim komunikata.

Suryana, E., Aprina, M. P., & Harto, K. (2022). Teori konstruktivistik dan implikasinya dalam pembelajaran. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(7), 2070-2080.

Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology. Work-Learning Research, 1(9), 1-9.

Vidayanti, N., Sugiarti, T., & Kurniati, D. (2017). Analisis kemampuan kognitif siswa kelas viii smp negeri 11 jember ditinjau dari gaya belajar dalam menyelesaikan soal pokok bahasan lingkaran. Kadikma, 8(1), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.19184/kdma.v8i1.5274

Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., Loeblein, P., & Perkins, K. K. (2010). Teaching physics using PhET simulations. The Physics Teacher, 48(4), 225-227. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3361987

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v12i3.19118